Suppr超能文献

使用温湿度指数评估热环境的可靠性。

Thermal environment assessment reliability using temperature--humidity indices.

机构信息

Dipartimento di Ingegneria Meccanica, Università di Salerno, Fisciano, Salerno, Italy.

出版信息

Ind Health. 2011;49(1):95-106. doi: 10.2486/indhealth.ms1097. Epub 2010 Sep 1.

Abstract

A reliable assessment of the thermal environment should take into account the whole of the six parameters affecting the thermal sensation (air temperature, air velocity, humidity, mean radiant temperature, metabolic rate and thermo-physical properties of clothing). Anyway, the need of a quick evaluation based on few measurements and calculations has leaded to like best temperature-humidity indices instead of rational methods based on the heat balance on the human body. Among these, Canadian Humidex, preliminarily used only for weather forecasts, is becoming more and more widespread for a generalized assessment of both outdoor and indoor thermal environments. This custom arouses great controversies since using an index validated in outdoor conditions does not assure its indoor reliability. Moreover is it really possible to carry out the thermal environment assessment ignoring some of variables involved in the physiological response of the human body? Aiming to give a clear answer to these questions, this paper deals with a comparison between the assessment carried out according to the rational methods suggested by International Standards in force and the Humidex index. This combined analysis under hot stress situations (indoor and outdoor) has been preliminarily carried out; in a second phase the study deals with the indoor comfort prediction. Obtained results show that Humidex index very often leads to the underestimation of the workplace dangerousness and a poor reliability of comfort prediction when it is used in indoor situations.

摘要

可靠的热环境评估应考虑到影响热感觉的六个参数的全部(空气温度、空气速度、湿度、平均辐射温度、代谢率和服装的热物理特性)。无论如何,基于少数测量和计算进行快速评估的需求导致了最佳温度-湿度指数的出现,而不是基于人体热平衡的合理方法。在这些指数中,加拿大湿热指数最初仅用于天气预报,现在越来越广泛地用于对室外和室内热环境进行综合评估。这种做法引起了很大的争议,因为在室内条件下使用经过验证的指数并不能保证其可靠性。此外,忽略人体生理反应中涉及的一些变量真的可以进行热环境评估吗?为了对这些问题给出明确的答案,本文对根据现行国际标准建议的合理方法和湿热指数进行的评估进行了比较。在热应激情况下(室内和室外)进行了初步的综合分析;在第二阶段,研究涉及室内舒适度预测。获得的结果表明,湿热指数在用于室内情况时,经常导致对工作场所危险程度的低估和舒适度预测的可靠性差。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验