Richard J L, Arveiler D, Cambou J P, Nuttens M C, Bingham A, Ruidavets J B, Schaffer P, Salomez J L, Douste-Blazy P
Projet MONICA Bas-Rhin, Faculté de Médecine, Strasbourg, France.
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 1990;38(5-6):403-10.
The 1985 and 1986 coronary event data from the three French MONICA Registers in Haute-Garonne (Toulouse), Bas-Rhin (Strasbourg) and the Urban Community of Lille (UCL) are used to compare the sources of information, the distribution of events in different diagnostic categories, and their possible effects on event rates. All three registers follow the MONICA protocol, and use the "cold pursuit" method, with data abstracted retrospectively from medical files or from the doctors establishing the causes of death. The health system and medical background are similar in the three centers. The distribution of the sources of information (in-hospital and out-of-hospital) and the distribution of events by diagnostic categories are different among centres. The possible effects of these differences on rates of definite myocardial infarction or possible coronary death are estimated between registers and within registers during a 2-year period. Cross-sectional comparisons are questionable, and possible false trends in event rates require special attention.
来自法国上加龙省(图卢兹)、下莱茵省(斯特拉斯堡)和里尔城市社区(UCL)的三个MONICA登记处1985年和1986年的冠心病事件数据,用于比较信息来源、不同诊断类别的事件分布及其对事件发生率的可能影响。所有三个登记处均遵循MONICA方案,并采用“冷追踪”方法,数据从医疗档案或确定死亡原因的医生处回顾性提取。这三个中心的卫生系统和医疗背景相似。各中心之间信息来源(院内和院外)的分布以及按诊断类别划分的事件分布有所不同。在2年期间,估计这些差异对确诊心肌梗死或可能的冠心病死亡发生率在登记处之间以及登记处内部的可能影响。横断面比较存在疑问,事件发生率中可能的错误趋势需要特别关注。