Rösner Susanne, Hackl-Herrwerth Andrea, Leucht Stefan, Lehert Philippe, Vecchi Simona, Soyka Michael
Psychiatric Hospital, University of Munich, Nussbaumstr. 7, Munich, Germany, 80336.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Sep 8(9):CD004332. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004332.pub2.
Alcohol dependence is among the main leading health risk factors in most developed and developing countries. Therapeutic success of psychosocial programs for relapse prevention is moderate, but could potentially be increased by an adjuvant treatment with the glutamate antagonist acamprosate.
To determine the effectiveness and tolerability of acamprosate in comparison to placebo and other pharmacological agents.
We searched the Cochrane Drugs and Alcohol Group (CDAG) Specialized Register, PubMed, EMBASE and CINAHL in January 2009 and inquired manufacturers and researchers for unpublished trials.
All double-blind randomised controlled trials (RCTs) which compare the effects of acamprosate with placebo or active control on drinking-related outcomes.
Two authors independently extracted data. Trial quality was assessed by one author and cross-checked by a second author. Individual patient data (IPD) meta-analyses were used to verify the primary effectiveness outcomes.
24 RCTs with 6915 participants fulfilled the criteria of inclusion and were included in the review. Compared to placebo, acamprosate was shown to significantly reduce the risk of any drinking RR 0.86 (95% CI 0.81 to 0.91); NNT 9.09 (95% CI 6.66 to 14.28) and to significantly increase the cumulative abstinence duration MD 10.94 (95% CI 5.08 to 16.81), while secondary outcomes (gamma-glutamyltransferase, heavy drinking) did not reach statistical significance. Diarrhea was the only side effect that was more frequently reported under acamprosate than placebo RD 0.11 (95% 0.09 to 0.13); NNTB 9.09 (95% CI 7.69 to 11.11). Effects of industry-sponsored trials RR 0.88 (95% 0.80 to 0.97) did not significantly differ from those of non-profit funded trials RR 0.88 (95% CI 0.81 to 0.96). In addition, the linear regression test did not indicate a significant risk of publication bias (p = 0.861).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Acamprosate appears to be an effective and safe treatment strategy for supporting continuous abstinence after detoxification in alcohol dependent patients. Even though the sizes of treatment effects appear to be rather moderate in their magnitude, they should be valued against the background of the relapsing nature of alcoholism and the limited therapeutic options currently available for its treatment.
在大多数发达国家和发展中国家,酒精依赖是主要的健康风险因素之一。心理社会干预项目预防复发的治疗效果一般,但通过添加谷氨酸拮抗剂阿坎酸辅助治疗,可能会提高疗效。
确定阿坎酸相对于安慰剂和其他药物的有效性和耐受性。
我们于2009年1月检索了Cochrane药物与酒精研究组(CDAG)专业注册库、PubMed、EMBASE和CINAHL,并向制造商和研究人员咨询未发表的试验。
所有比较阿坎酸与安慰剂或活性对照对饮酒相关结局影响的双盲随机对照试验(RCT)。
两位作者独立提取数据。由一位作者评估试验质量,并由另一位作者进行交叉核对。采用个体患者数据(IPD)荟萃分析来验证主要有效性结局。
24项RCT共6915名参与者符合纳入标准并纳入本综述。与安慰剂相比,阿坎酸可显著降低任何饮酒风险RR 0.86(95%CI 0.81至0.91);NNT 9.09(95%CI 6.66至14.28),并显著延长累积戒酒持续时间MD 10.94(95%CI 5.08至16.81),而次要结局(γ-谷氨酰转移酶、重度饮酒)未达到统计学显著性。腹泻是唯一比安慰剂更常报道的阿坎酸副作用RD 0.11(95% 0.09至0.13);NNTB 9.09(95%CI 7.69至11.11)。行业资助试验的效果RR 0.88(95% 0.80至0.97)与非营利性资助试验的效果RR 0.88(95%CI 0.81至0.96)无显著差异。此外,线性回归检验未显示明显的发表偏倚风险(p = 0.861)。
阿坎酸似乎是一种有效且安全的治疗策略,可支持酒精依赖患者解毒后持续戒酒。尽管治疗效果的规模似乎相当适中,但鉴于酒精中毒的复发性以及目前可用的治疗选择有限,这些效果仍应得到重视。