• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

认识你自己:元认知网络和意识的测量。

Know thyself: metacognitive networks and measures of consciousness.

机构信息

Consciousness, Cognition, and Computation Group, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 1050 Bruxelles, Belgium.

出版信息

Cognition. 2010 Nov;117(2):182-90. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.08.010. Epub 2010 Sep 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.cognition.2010.08.010
PMID:20825936
Abstract

Subjective measures of awareness rest on the assumption that conscious knowledge is knowledge that participants know they possess. Post-Decision Wagering (PDW), recently proposed as a new measure of awareness, requires participants to place a high or a low wager on their decisions. Whereas advantageous wagering indicates awareness of the knowledge on which the decisions are based, cases in which participants fail to optimize their wagers suggest performance without awareness. Here, we hypothesize that wagering and other subjective measures of awareness reflect metacognitive capacities subtended by self-developed metarepresentations that inform an agent about its own internal states. To support this idea, we present three simulations in which neural networks learn to wager on their own responses. The simulations illustrate essential properties that are required for such metarepresentations to influence PDW as a measure of awareness. Results demonstrate a good fit to human data. We discuss the implications of this modeling work for our understanding of consciousness and its measures.

摘要

主观意识测量基于这样的假设,即意识知识是参与者知道自己拥有的知识。最近提出的后决策押注(Post-Decision Wagering,简称 PDW)作为一种新的意识测量方法,要求参与者对他们的决策进行高或低的押注。有利的押注表明对决策所依据的知识有意识,而在参与者未能优化他们的押注的情况下,则表明存在无意识的表现。在这里,我们假设押注和其他主观意识测量方法反映了元认知能力,这些能力由自我开发的元表征所支撑,这些元表征可以向主体提供有关其自身内部状态的信息。为了支持这一观点,我们提出了三个模拟,其中神经网络学会对自己的反应进行押注。这些模拟说明了对于这种元表征作为意识测量方法的影响,所必需的基本性质。结果与人类数据拟合良好。我们讨论了这项建模工作对我们理解意识及其测量方法的影响。

相似文献

1
Know thyself: metacognitive networks and measures of consciousness.认识你自己:元认知网络和意识的测量。
Cognition. 2010 Nov;117(2):182-90. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.08.010. Epub 2010 Sep 9.
2
Measuring consciousness: is one measure better than the other?测量意识:一种测量方法是否优于另一种?
Conscious Cogn. 2010 Dec;19(4):1069-78. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2009.12.013. Epub 2010 Feb 4.
3
Gambling on the unconscious: a comparison of wagering and confidence ratings as measures of awareness in an artificial grammar task.赌博与无意识:在人工语法任务中对赌注和置信度评分作为意识测量指标的比较。
Conscious Cogn. 2010 Jun;19(2):674-81. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2009.09.009. Epub 2009 Oct 13.
4
Don't bet on it! Wagering as a measure of awareness in decision making under uncertainty.别打赌!在不确定条件下的决策中,作为一种意识衡量标准的打赌。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2014 Dec;143(6):2111-34. doi: 10.1037/a0037977. Epub 2014 Oct 13.
5
Post-decision wagering measures metacognitive content, not sensory consciousness.决策后押注衡量的是元认知内容,而非感官意识。
Conscious Cogn. 2008 Sep;17(3):981-3. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2007.05.008. Epub 2007 Jun 27.
6
Subjective measures of consciousness in artificial grammar learning task.人工语法学习任务中的意识主观测量。
Conscious Cogn. 2012 Sep;21(3):1141-53. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2012.05.012. Epub 2012 Jun 22.
7
Post-decision wagering objectively measures awareness.决策后投注客观地衡量意识。
Nat Neurosci. 2007 Feb;10(2):257-61. doi: 10.1038/nn1840. Epub 2007 Jan 21.
8
Consciousness meets neuroeconomics: what is the value of stimulus awareness in decision making?意识与神经经济学相遇:刺激意识在决策中的价值是什么?
Neuron. 2008 Aug 28;59(4):525-7. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.08.003.
9
The effect of subjective awareness measures on performance in artificial grammar learning task.主观意识测量对人工语法学习任务表现的影响。
Conscious Cogn. 2018 Jan;57:116-133. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2017.11.010. Epub 2017 Dec 6.
10
Absence of advantageous wagering does not mean that awareness is fully abolished.无优势赌局并不意味着意识完全被消除。
Conscious Cogn. 2010 Mar;19(1):426-31. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2009.12.011. Epub 2010 Feb 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Survey measures of metacognitive monitoring are often false.元认知监测的调查测量结果往往是不准确的。
Behav Res Methods. 2025 Feb 18;57(3):97. doi: 10.3758/s13428-025-02621-6.
2
Frontopolar Cortex Interacts With Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex to Causally Guide Metacognition.额极皮层与背外侧前额叶皮层相互作用,因果性地引导元认知。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2025 Feb 1;46(2):e70146. doi: 10.1002/hbm.70146.
3
Estimating self-performance when making complex decisions.在做出复杂决策时评估自我表现。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 25;15(1):3203. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-87601-8.
4
Metacognition biases information seeking in assessing ambiguous news.元认知会在评估模糊新闻时影响信息搜索。
Commun Psychol. 2024 Dec 19;2(1):122. doi: 10.1038/s44271-024-00170-w.
5
Metacognitive Feelings: A Predictive-Processing Perspective.元认知情感:一种预测加工视角
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2024 Jan 29:17456916231221976. doi: 10.1177/17456916231221976.
6
Natural statistics support a rational account of confidence biases.自然统计数据支持对置信偏差进行理性解释。
Nat Commun. 2023 Jul 6;14(1):3992. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-39737-2.
7
Mindfulness in the focus of the neurosciences - The contribution of neuroimaging to the understanding of mindfulness.神经科学聚焦下的正念——神经成像对理解正念的贡献。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2022 Oct 17;16:928522. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2022.928522. eCollection 2022.
8
Dynamic influences on static measures of metacognition.动态对元认知静态测量的影响。
Nat Commun. 2022 Jul 21;13(1):4208. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-31727-0.
9
Are you confident enough to act? Individual differences in action control are associated with post-decisional metacognitive bias.你有足够的信心采取行动吗?决策后元认知偏差与行动控制的个体差异有关。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 1;17(6):e0268501. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268501. eCollection 2022.
10
Cognitive mechanisms of statistical learning and segmentation of continuous sensory input.统计学习和连续感官输入分割的认知机制。
Mem Cognit. 2022 Jul;50(5):979-996. doi: 10.3758/s13421-021-01264-0. Epub 2021 Dec 29.