• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自然统计数据支持对置信偏差进行理性解释。

Natural statistics support a rational account of confidence biases.

机构信息

University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.

出版信息

Nat Commun. 2023 Jul 6;14(1):3992. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-39737-2.

DOI:10.1038/s41467-023-39737-2
PMID:37414780
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10326055/
Abstract

Previous work has sought to understand decision confidence as a prediction of the probability that a decision will be correct, leading to debate over whether these predictions are optimal, and whether they rely on the same decision variable as decisions themselves. This work has generally relied on idealized, low-dimensional models, necessitating strong assumptions about the representations over which confidence is computed. To address this, we used deep neural networks to develop a model of decision confidence that operates directly over high-dimensional, naturalistic stimuli. The model accounts for a number of puzzling dissociations between decisions and confidence, reveals a rational explanation of these dissociations in terms of optimization for the statistics of sensory inputs, and makes the surprising prediction that, despite these dissociations, decisions and confidence depend on a common decision variable.

摘要

先前的研究旨在理解决策信心作为决策正确概率的预测指标,由此引发了关于这些预测是否最优以及它们是否依赖于与决策本身相同的决策变量的争论。这些研究通常依赖于理想化的低维模型,因此需要对用于计算置信度的表示形式做出严格的假设。为了解决这个问题,我们使用深度神经网络开发了一个直接作用于高维自然刺激的决策信心模型。该模型解释了决策和信心之间的许多令人费解的分离现象,根据对感官输入统计数据的优化,为这些分离现象提供了合理的解释,并做出了令人惊讶的预测,即尽管存在这些分离现象,决策和信心仍然依赖于共同的决策变量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3365/10326055/d453aaed506f/41467_2023_39737_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3365/10326055/fb1382bae019/41467_2023_39737_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3365/10326055/2ab609202711/41467_2023_39737_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3365/10326055/2176d1ea8bff/41467_2023_39737_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3365/10326055/1668caf1ee8f/41467_2023_39737_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3365/10326055/30f4835e52be/41467_2023_39737_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3365/10326055/c8fb61a89305/41467_2023_39737_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3365/10326055/a6d558cf6523/41467_2023_39737_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3365/10326055/cdaf54310a88/41467_2023_39737_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3365/10326055/525f74a0721e/41467_2023_39737_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3365/10326055/d453aaed506f/41467_2023_39737_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3365/10326055/fb1382bae019/41467_2023_39737_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3365/10326055/2ab609202711/41467_2023_39737_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3365/10326055/2176d1ea8bff/41467_2023_39737_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3365/10326055/1668caf1ee8f/41467_2023_39737_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3365/10326055/30f4835e52be/41467_2023_39737_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3365/10326055/c8fb61a89305/41467_2023_39737_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3365/10326055/a6d558cf6523/41467_2023_39737_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3365/10326055/cdaf54310a88/41467_2023_39737_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3365/10326055/525f74a0721e/41467_2023_39737_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3365/10326055/d453aaed506f/41467_2023_39737_Fig10_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Natural statistics support a rational account of confidence biases.自然统计数据支持对置信偏差进行理性解释。
Nat Commun. 2023 Jul 6;14(1):3992. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-39737-2.
2
Leveraging Math Cognition to Combat Health Innumeracy.利用数学认知来对抗健康数字盲。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2023 Jan;18(1):152-177. doi: 10.1177/17456916221083277. Epub 2022 Aug 9.
3
Serial Dependence in Perceptual Decisions Is Reflected in Activity Patterns in Primary Visual Cortex.感知决策中的序列依赖性反映在初级视觉皮层的活动模式中。
J Neurosci. 2016 Jun 8;36(23):6186-92. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4390-15.2016.
4
A Mathematical Framework for Statistical Decision Confidence.统计决策置信度的数学框架。
Neural Comput. 2016 Sep;28(9):1840-58. doi: 10.1162/NECO_a_00864. Epub 2016 Jul 8.
5
Adaptive History Biases Result from Confidence-Weighted Accumulation of past Choices.适应性历史偏差源于过去选择的置信度加权积累。
J Neurosci. 2018 Mar 7;38(10):2418-2429. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2189-17.2017. Epub 2018 Jan 25.
6
Evaluating the Presence of Cognitive Biases in Health Care Decision Making: A Survey of U.S. Formulary Decision Makers.评估医疗保健决策中的认知偏差:对美国处方决策制定者的调查。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2018 Nov;24(11):1173-1183. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2018.24.11.1173.
7
Decision making biases in the allied health professions: A systematic scoping review.辅助卫生专业人员的决策偏差:系统范围综述。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 20;15(10):e0240716. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240716. eCollection 2020.
8
Differentiating between Models of Perceptual Decision Making Using Pupil Size Inferred Confidence.使用瞳孔大小推断的置信度区分感知决策模型。
J Neurosci. 2018 Oct 10;38(41):8874-8888. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0735-18.2018. Epub 2018 Aug 31.
9
Resource-rational analysis: Understanding human cognition as the optimal use of limited computational resources.资源理性分析:将人类认知理解为对有限计算资源的最佳利用。
Behav Brain Sci. 2019 Feb 4;43:e1. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X1900061X.
10
The anchoring bias reflects rational use of cognitive resources.锚定偏差反映了认知资源的理性使用。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Feb;25(1):322-349. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1286-8.

引用本文的文献

1
A Comprehensive Drift-Adaptive Framework for Sustaining Model Performance in COVID-19 Detection From Dynamic Cough Audio Data: Model Development and Validation.一种用于在动态咳嗽音频数据的COVID-19检测中维持模型性能的综合漂移自适应框架:模型开发与验证
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jun 3;27:e66919. doi: 10.2196/66919.
2
A novel behavioral paradigm reveals the nature of confidence computation in multi-alternative perceptual decision making.一种新颖的行为范式揭示了多选项感知决策中信心计算的本质。
Res Sq. 2024 Dec 11:rs.3.rs-5510856. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-5510856/v1.
3
Reflexivity gradient-Consciousness knowing itself.

本文引用的文献

1
The positive evidence bias in perceptual confidence is unlikely post-decisional.知觉信心方面的积极证据偏差不太可能是决策后产生的。
Neurosci Conscious. 2022 Jul 26;2022(1):niac010. doi: 10.1093/nc/niac010. eCollection 2022.
2
Bayesian inference with incomplete knowledge explains perceptual confidence and its deviations from accuracy.贝叶斯推断与不完全知识解释了感知信心及其与准确性的偏差。
Nat Commun. 2021 Sep 29;12(1):5704. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-25419-4.
3
Rats use memory confidence to guide decisions.老鼠利用记忆信心来指导决策。
反思性梯度——意识自知。
Front Psychol. 2024 Aug 23;15:1450553. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1450553. eCollection 2024.
4
Pharmacological Elevation of Catecholamine Levels Improves Perceptual Decisions, But Not Metacognitive Insight.提高儿茶酚胺水平的药理学作用可以改善知觉决策,但不能改善元认知洞察。
eNeuro. 2024 Jul 29;11(7). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0019-24.2024. Print 2024 Jul.
5
Toward 'Computational-Rationality' Approaches to Arbitrating Models of Cognition: A Case Study Using Perceptual Metacognition.迈向用于评判认知模型的“计算合理性”方法:以感知元认知为例的案例研究
Open Mind (Camb). 2023 Sep 20;7:652-674. doi: 10.1162/opmi_a_00100. eCollection 2023.
Curr Biol. 2021 Oct 25;31(20):4571-4583.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.08.013. Epub 2021 Sep 1.
4
Tuned inhibition in perceptual decision-making circuits can explain seemingly suboptimal confidence behavior.知觉决策回路中的调谐抑制可以解释看似次优的置信行为。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2021 Mar 29;17(3):e1008779. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008779. eCollection 2021 Mar.
5
Array programming with NumPy.使用 NumPy 进行数组编程。
Nature. 2020 Sep;585(7825):357-362. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
6
Behavior- and Modality-General Representation of Confidence in Orbitofrontal Cortex.眶额皮层中信心的行为和模态泛化表征。
Cell. 2020 Jul 9;182(1):112-126.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.05.022. Epub 2020 Jun 5.
7
Confidence controls perceptual evidence accumulation.置信度控制感知证据的积累。
Nat Commun. 2020 Apr 9;11(1):1753. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-15561-w.
8
A decision-congruent heuristic gives superior metacognitive sensitivity under realistic variance assumptions.在符合决策的启发式条件下,在现实方差假设下具有更高的元认知敏感性。
Psychol Rev. 2020 Oct;127(5):655-671. doi: 10.1037/rev0000184. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
9
SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python.SciPy 1.0:Python 中的科学计算基础算法。
Nat Methods. 2020 Mar;17(3):261-272. doi: 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
10
Comparing Bayesian and non-Bayesian accounts of human confidence reports.比较人类信心报告的贝叶斯和非贝叶斯解释。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2018 Nov 13;14(11):e1006572. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006572. eCollection 2018 Nov.