Turhan Tuncer, Ersahin Yusuf
Department of Neurosurgery, Ege University, Bornova, Izmir 35100, Turkey.
Childs Nerv Syst. 2011 Mar;27(3):439-44. doi: 10.1007/s00381-010-1273-0. Epub 2010 Sep 9.
Bleeding is the most important problem in neuroendoscopic procedures. The visibility of the bleeding point for a long period of time is very crucial for the surgeon to stop the bleeding. In this study, the performances of a near-infrared camera (NIRC) and a visible light camera (VLC), which is widely used today, were compared in terms of the visibility duration of the bleeding point.
A bleeding point was generated in vitro, and it was monitored with VLC and NIRC (sensitive to 850-nm infrared light), which were connected to two identical telescope systems. This trial was repeated for 40 times using different telescope systems (Clarus neurochannel endoscopy and Storz Hopkins). The images were merged and analyzed digitally.
Statistically, sharper brightness difference levels between bleeding point and background are achieved by NIRC than VLC. Analyses revealed that the bleeding point could be observed for a longer time with NIRC, when compared to VLC.
NIRCs may provide very significant advantages against bleedings encountered during intraventricular operations.
出血是神经内镜手术中最重要的问题。长时间清晰看到出血点对于外科医生止血至关重要。在本研究中,比较了近红外相机(NIRC)和如今广泛使用的可见光相机(VLC)在出血点可见持续时间方面的性能。
在体外制造一个出血点,并用连接到两个相同望远镜系统的VLC和NIRC(对850纳米红外光敏感)进行监测。使用不同的望远镜系统(Clarus神经通道内镜和Storz Hopkins)将该试验重复40次。对图像进行合并并进行数字分析。
从统计学角度来看,NIRC比VLC在出血点与背景之间实现了更明显的亮度差异水平。分析表明,与VLC相比,使用NIRC能更长时间观察到出血点。
近红外相机在应对脑室内手术中遇到的出血情况时可能具有非常显著的优势。