• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者自测的“延续”效应:对抗凝管理服务的常规护理管理的积极影响。

The 'carry-over' effects of patient self-testing: positive effects on usual care management by an anticoagulation management service.

机构信息

Pharmaceutical Care Research Group, School of Pharmacy, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.

出版信息

Thromb Res. 2010 Nov;126(5):e345-8. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2010.08.001. Epub 2010 Sep 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.thromres.2010.08.001
PMID:20828796
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Patient self-testing (PST) of the international normalised ratio (INR) has a positive effect on anticoagulation control. This study investigated whether the benefits of PST (other than increased frequency of testing, e.g. patient education, empowerment, compliance etc.) could be 'carried-over' into usual care management after a period of home-testing has ceased.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients that completed a six month period of PST (as part of a randomised controlled trial) but returned to clinic management when the trial ended were included in the study. The primary outcome variable was the difference in anticoagulation control (measured using the time in therapeutic range) between the two periods. A group of patients who were managed solely by the anticoagulation clinic served as the control.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in median time in therapeutic range (TTR) between the 52 patients during clinic management post-PST and the six month period of PST (75% vs 75.3%; p=0.061). Patients tested more frequently while home-testing compared with the subsequent six month period of clinic management (once every 5.6±0.7days compared with once every 23.2±7.4days; p=0.000). Patients with previous experience of PST performed significantly better than the control group of patients (n=107) that were managed solely by the anticoagulation clinic (75% vs 59.7%; p=0.009) despite less frequent monitoring of the INR (every 23.2±7.4days vs. 17.4±6.7days; p=0.000).

CONCLUSIONS

The improvements in anticoagulation control observed during a period of PST can be sustained when patients cease home-testing and revert back to usual care management.

摘要

简介

患者自我检测(PST)国际标准化比值(INR)对抗凝控制有积极影响。本研究调查了 PST 的益处(除了增加测试频率,例如患者教育、赋权、依从性等)在家庭测试结束后是否可以“延续”到常规护理管理中。

材料和方法

完成六个月 PST 期(作为随机对照试验的一部分)但试验结束后返回诊所管理的患者被纳入研究。主要观察变量是两个时期抗凝控制的差异(通过治疗范围内的时间测量)。一组仅由抗凝诊所管理的患者作为对照组。

结果

在 PST 后诊所管理期间的 52 名患者和 PST 的六个月期间,中位数治疗范围内时间(TTR)没有显著差异(75%对 75.3%;p=0.061)。与随后的六个月诊所管理期间相比,患者在家中测试时测试频率更高(每 5.6±0.7 天一次与每 23.2±7.4 天一次;p=0.000)。有 PST 既往经验的患者表现明显优于仅由抗凝诊所管理的对照组患者(n=107)(75%对 59.7%;p=0.009),尽管 INR 的监测频率较低(每 23.2±7.4 天与每 17.4±6.7 天;p=0.000)。

结论

当患者停止家庭测试并恢复常规护理管理时,PST 期间观察到的抗凝控制改善可以持续。

相似文献

1
The 'carry-over' effects of patient self-testing: positive effects on usual care management by an anticoagulation management service.患者自测的“延续”效应:对抗凝管理服务的常规护理管理的积极影响。
Thromb Res. 2010 Nov;126(5):e345-8. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2010.08.001. Epub 2010 Sep 15.
2
Home prothrombin time monitoring: a literature analysis.家庭凝血酶原时间监测:文献分析
Am J Hematol. 2004 Oct;77(2):177-86. doi: 10.1002/ajh.20161.
3
The impact of patient self-testing of prothrombin time for managing anticoagulation: rationale and design of VA Cooperative Study #481--the Home INR Study (THINRS).患者自我检测凝血酶原时间对抗凝治疗管理的影响:VA合作研究#481(家庭国际标准化比值研究,即THINRS)的原理与设计
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2005 Jun;19(3):163-72. doi: 10.1007/s11239-005-1452-0.
4
Meta-analysis: effect of patient self-testing and self-management of long-term anticoagulation on major clinical outcomes.荟萃分析:患者自行检测和自我管理长期抗凝对主要临床结局的影响。
Ann Intern Med. 2011 Apr 5;154(7):472-82. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-154-7-201104050-00005.
5
Assessment of patient capability to self-adjust oral anticoagulant dose: a multicenter study on home use of portable prothrombin time monitor (COAGUCHECK).患者自我调整口服抗凝剂剂量能力的评估:一项关于便携式凝血酶原时间监测仪(COAGUCHECK)家庭使用的多中心研究。
Haematologica. 2000 Aug;85(8):826-31.
6
A randomised control trial of patient self-management of oral anticoagulation compared with patient self-testing.口服抗凝治疗患者自我管理与患者自我检测的随机对照试验。
Br J Haematol. 2006 Mar;132(5):598-603. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2005.05899.x.
7
The value of education and self-monitoring in the management of warfarin therapy in older patients with unstable control of anticoagulation.教育与自我监测在老年华法林治疗抗凝控制不稳定患者管理中的价值
Br J Haematol. 2004 Aug;126(4):557-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2004.05074.x.
8
Quality assurance program for whole blood prothrombin time-international normalized ratio point-of-care monitors used for patient self-testing to control oral anticoagulation.用于患者自我检测以控制口服抗凝治疗的全血凝血酶原时间-国际标准化比值即时检测监测仪的质量保证计划。
Thromb Res. 2004;113(1):35-40. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2004.01.009.
9
International Normalized Ratio (INR): an improved way to monitor oral anticoagulant therapy.国际标准化比值(INR):监测口服抗凝治疗的一种改进方法。
Nurse Pract. 1995 Sep;20(9):15-6, 21-2.
10
Point-of-care monitoring of oral anticoagulation therapy in children. Comparison of the CoaguChek XS system with venous INR and venous INR using an International Reference Thromboplastin preparation (rTF/95).儿童口服抗凝治疗的床旁监测。使用国际参考凝血活酶制剂(rTF/95)对CoaguChek XS系统与静脉血国际标准化比值(INR)及静脉血INR进行比较。
Thromb Haemost. 2009 Jul;102(1):159-65. doi: 10.1160/TH09-01-0056.

引用本文的文献

1
Recent Developments in Magnetic Diagnostic Systems.磁诊断系统的最新进展。
Chem Rev. 2015 Oct 14;115(19):10690-724. doi: 10.1021/cr500698d. Epub 2015 Aug 10.
2
Effective and Safe Management of Oral Anticoagulation Therapy in Patients Who Use the Internet-Accessed Telecontrol Tool SintromacWeb.使用互联网接入的远程控制工具SintromacWeb的患者口服抗凝治疗的有效且安全管理
Interact J Med Res. 2015 Apr 21;4(2):e10. doi: 10.2196/ijmr.3610.