Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143-0131, USA.
J Am Coll Surg. 2010 Nov;211(5):601-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.07.006. Epub 2010 Sep 15.
How case volume and quality of care relate to each other and to results of complex cancer surgery is not well-understood.
Observational cohort of 14,170 patients 18 years or older who underwent pneumonectomy, esophagectomy, pancreatectomy, or pelvic surgery for cancer between October 1, 2003 and September 1, 2005 at a US hospital participating in a large benchmarking database. Case volumes were estimated within our dataset. Quality was measured by determining whether ideal patients did not receive appropriate perioperative medications (such as antibiotics to prevent surgical site infections), both as individual "missed"measures and as overall number missed. We used hierarchical models to estimate effects of volume and quality on 30-day readmission, in-hospital mortality, length of stay, and costs.
After adjustment, we noted no consistent associations between higher hospital or surgeon volume and mortality, readmission, length of stay, or costs. Adherence to individual measures was not consistently associated with improvement in readmission, mortality, or other outcomes. For example, continuing antimicrobials past 24 hours was associated with longer length of stay (21.5% higher, 95% CI, 19.5-23.6%) and higher costs (17% higher, 95% CI, 16-19%). In contrast, overall adherence, although not associated with differences in mortality or readmission, was consistently associated with longer length of stay (7.4% longer with 1 missed measure and 16.4% longer with ≥2) and higher costs (5% higher with 1 missed measure, and 11% higher with ≥2).
Although hospital and surgeon volume were not associated with outcomes, lower overall adherence to quality measures is associated with higher costs, but not improved outcomes. This finding might provide a rationale for improving care systems by maximizing care consistency, even if outcomes are not affected.
手术量和医疗质量如何相互关联,以及它们与复杂癌症手术的结果之间的关系,目前尚未得到充分理解。
这是一项观察性队列研究,纳入了 2003 年 10 月 1 日至 2005 年 9 月 1 日期间在美国一家参与大型基准数据库的医院接受肺切除术、食管切除术、胰腺切除术或骨盆手术治疗癌症的 14170 名 18 岁及以上患者。在我们的数据集内对手术量进行了估计。质量通过确定是否理想患者未接受适当的围手术期药物(如预防手术部位感染的抗生素)来衡量,包括作为个别“遗漏”措施和整体遗漏数量。我们使用分层模型来估计手术量和质量对 30 天再入院、住院死亡率、住院时间和成本的影响。
在调整后,我们没有发现医院或外科医生手术量较高与死亡率、再入院率、住院时间或成本之间存在一致的关联。个别措施的遵守情况与再入院率、死亡率或其他结果的改善也不一致。例如,继续使用抗生素超过 24 小时与住院时间延长(延长 21.5%,95%置信区间,19.5%-23.6%)和成本增加(增加 17%,95%置信区间,16%-19%)有关。相比之下,虽然整体遵守情况与死亡率或再入院率无关,但与住院时间延长(遗漏 1 项措施时延长 7.4%,遗漏 2 项或以上时延长 16.4%)和成本增加(遗漏 1 项措施时增加 5%,遗漏 2 项或以上时增加 11%)有关。
尽管医院和外科医生的手术量与结果无关,但整体上对质量措施的遵守程度较低与成本增加有关,但与改善结果无关。这一发现可能为通过最大限度地提高护理一致性来改善护理系统提供了一个理由,即使结果不受影响。