Barcellos Daphne Camara, Torres Carlos Rocha Gomes, Pucci Cesar Rogerio, Borges Alessandra Buhler, Goncalves Sergio Eduardo de Paiva, Limeira Renata, Souza Dayane
Clinical Research Academic Group, Sao Jose dos Campos School of Dentistry, Sao Paulo State Unviersity, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Gen Dent. 2010 Sep-Oct;58(5):e206-9.
This study compared the color fidelity of different composite resins with their registration in the Vita Classical Shade Guide. Using a prefabricated Teflon mold, 120 specimens were divided into four groups (n = 30), according to the resin tested. Three subgroups (n = 10) were prepared for each resin group; these subgroups tested enamel shade, dentin shade, and enamel and dentin shade. Three measurements were performed to verify whether the tooth shade matched that of the Vita Classical Shade Guide. The color was evaluated and the shade variations were calculated. The data were submitted to a three-way ANOVA test (time, color match, and composite type), followed by Tukey's test. It was concluded that all composite resins showed color differences in relation to the Vita Classical Shade Guide.
本研究比较了不同复合树脂与Vita经典比色板中颜色匹配度的色彩逼真度。使用预制的聚四氟乙烯模具,根据所测试的树脂将120个样本分为四组(n = 30)。为每个树脂组准备三个亚组(n = 10);这些亚组分别测试釉质色、牙本质色以及釉质和牙本质色。进行三次测量以验证牙齿颜色是否与Vita经典比色板匹配。评估颜色并计算色差值。数据进行三因素方差分析(时间、颜色匹配度和复合材料类型),随后进行Tukey检验。得出的结论是,所有复合树脂与Vita经典比色板相比均存在颜色差异。