Suppr超能文献

解剖双层复合树脂比色指南的评估。

Evaluation of an anatomic dual-laminate composite resin shade guide.

机构信息

Don and Sybil Harrington Professor of Esthetic Dentistry, Restorative Sciences, Ostrow School of Dentistry, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

出版信息

J Dent. 2013 Aug;41 Suppl 3:e80-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.05.001.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Color assessment in aesthetic dentistry is one of the most challenging steps for direct restorative treatment. Shade selection tools should be able to mimic closely the materials and layering technique used in the final restoration, hence the development of prefabricated anatomic dual-laminate shade guides.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to compare different shade selection techniques and determine the suitability of a prefabricated anatomic dual-laminate shade guide and its best mode of use compared to a conventional guide and a layered custom guide.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

CIELab coordinates of different shade guides were assessed: Vitapan Classical (tab A2; Vita); Miris2 prefabricated anatomic dual-laminate shade guide, enamel WR tab on top of dentine S3 tab and nothing in-between (M2air) or glycerin gel (M2gly) or water (M2w); custom shade guide using prefabricated silicon moulds, Miris2 enamel WR composite resin moulded directly on dentine S3 pre-polymerised base (M2cus). The average values were obtained to calculate DE and compare the different shade selection techniques. Additional samples and measurements were made to compare Vitapan Classical shade tabs A1, A2 and A3 and all possible combinations of Miris2 and establish the closest matching shade (DE 3.3).

RESULTS

High DE values were found (6.51–9.11) when comparing M2air to Vita, M2gly M2w M2cus. Differences appeared acceptable (DE 2.09–2.99) between Vita, M2gly and M2w and M2cus. Seven combinations of M2 were found to match Vita tab A1 and A2 and three Miris2 combinations for Vita A3 (DE 3.3).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of Miris2 prefabricated anatomic dual-laminate shade guide with interposition of water or glycerin between the enamel–dentine tabs demonstrated acceptable DE values when compared to Vitapan Classical and custom guides. A chart for matching Vita shades with various combinations of Miris2 enamel/dentine shades was produced to assist the clinician in obtaining acceptable restorations.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

The prefabricated anatomic dual-laminate shade guide is as efficient as a custom shade guide, facilitating clinical steps and saving material when doing compositeresin restorations.

摘要

背景

在美学牙科中,颜色评估是直接修复治疗最具挑战性的步骤之一。比色选择工具应能够模拟最终修复体中使用的材料和分层技术,因此预制解剖双层比色指南应运而生。

目的

本研究旨在比较不同的比色选择技术,并确定预制解剖双层比色指南的适用性及其与传统指南和分层定制指南相比的最佳使用模式。

材料和方法

评估了不同比色指南的 CIELab 坐标:VitaPan Classical(标签 A2;Vita);Miris2 预制解剖双层比色指南,釉质 WR 标签置于牙本质 S3 标签之上,中间没有任何东西(M2air)或甘油凝胶(M2gly)或水(M2w);使用预制硅模具的定制比色指南,Miris2 釉质 WR 复合树脂直接成型于牙本质 S3 预聚物基底(M2cus)。获得平均值以计算 DE 并比较不同的比色选择技术。还进行了额外的样本和测量,以比较 VitaPan Classical 比色标签 A1、A2 和 A3 以及 Miris2 的所有可能组合,并确定最匹配的颜色(DE 3.3)。

结果

当将 M2air 与 Vita、M2gly、M2w、M2cus 进行比较时,发现 DE 值较高(6.51-9.11)。在 Vita、M2gly 和 M2w 以及 M2cus 之间,差异在可接受范围内(DE 2.09-2.99)。发现有七种 Miris2 组合可与 Vita tab A1 和 A2 匹配,三种 Miris2 组合可与 Vita tab A3 匹配(DE 3.3)。

结论

当与 VitaPan Classical 和定制指南相比时,在釉质-牙本质标签之间插入水或甘油的 Miris2 预制解剖双层比色指南的使用显示出可接受的 DE 值。制作了一张 Vita 各种比色组合与 Miris2 釉质/牙本质比色组合相匹配的图表,以帮助临床医生获得可接受的修复体。

临床意义

预制解剖双层比色指南与定制比色指南一样有效,可简化临床步骤并节省复合材料修复时的材料。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验