Suppr超能文献

奥美沙坦酯与雷米普利治疗老年轻中度原发性高血压的降压疗效和安全性:ESPONT 研究。

Antihypertensive efficacy and safety of olmesartan medoxomil and ramipril in elderly patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension: the ESPORT study.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Ospedale L. Sacco, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

J Hypertens. 2010 Nov;28(11):2342-50. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e32833e116b.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and safety of the angiotensin II antagonist olmesartan medoxomil (O) and the ACE inhibitor ramipril (R) in elderly patients with essential arterial hypertension.

METHODS

After a 2-week placebo wash-out 1102 treated or untreated elderly hypertensive patients aged 65-89 years (office sitting diastolic blood pressure, DBP, 90-109 mmHg and/or office sitting systolic blood pressure, SBP, 140-179 mmHg) were randomized double-blind to 12-week treatment with O 10 mg or R 2.5 mg once-daily. After the first 2 and 6 weeks doses could be doubled in non-normalized [blood pressure (BP) < 140/90 mmHg for nondiabetic and < 130/80 mmHg for diabetic) individuals, up to 40 mg for O and 10 mg for R. Office BPs were assessed at randomization, after 2, 6 and 12 weeks of treatment, whereas 24-h ambulatory BP was recorded at randomization and after 12 weeks.

RESULTS

In the intention-to-treat population (542 patients O and 539 R) after 12 weeks of treatment baseline-adjusted office SBP and DBP reductions were greater (P < 0.01) with O [17.8 (95% confidence interval: 16.8/18.9) and 9.2 (8.6/9.8) mmHg] than with R [15.7 (14.7/16.8) and 7.7 (7.1/8.3) mmHg]. BP normalization rate was also greater under O (52.6 vs. 46.0% R, P < 0.05). In the subgroup of patients with valid ambulatory BP recording (318 O and 312 R) the reduction in 24-h average BP was larger (P < 0.05) with O [SBP: 11.0 (12.2/9.9) and DBP: 6.5 (7.2/5.8) mmHg] than with R [9.0 (10.2/7.9) and 5.4 (6.1/4.7) mmHg]. The larger blood pressure reduction obtained with O was particularly evident in the last 6 h from the dosing interval; a better homogeneity of the 24-h BP control with O was confirmed by higher smoothness indices. The proportion of patients with drug-related adverse events was comparable in the two groups (3.6 O vs. 3.6% R), as well as the number of patients discontinuing study drug because of a side effect (14 O vs. 19 R).

CONCLUSION

In elderly patients with essential arterial hypertension O provides an effective, prolonged and well tolerated BP control, representing a useful option among first-line drug treatments of hypertension in this age group.

摘要

目的

比较血管紧张素Ⅱ拮抗剂奥美沙坦酯(O)和血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂雷米普利(R)在老年原发性高血压患者中的疗效和安全性。

方法

在 2 周安慰剂洗脱期后,1102 名未经治疗或接受治疗的 65-89 岁老年高血压患者(诊室坐位舒张压,DBP,90-109mmHg 和/或诊室坐位收缩压,SBP,140-179mmHg)被随机双盲分为 12 周奥美沙坦酯 10mg 或雷米普利 2.5mg 每日一次治疗。在最初 2 周和 6 周后,非正常血压[非糖尿病患者血压(BP)<140/90mmHg,糖尿病患者血压<130/80mmHg]的患者可将剂量加倍,奥美沙坦酯最高剂量为 40mg,雷米普利为 10mg。在随机分组时、治疗 2 周和 6 周后评估诊室血压,治疗 12 周后记录 24 小时动态血压。

结果

在意向治疗人群(542 例奥美沙坦酯患者和 539 例雷米普利患者)中,治疗 12 周后,经基线校正的诊室 SBP 和 DBP 降低幅度更大(P<0.01),奥美沙坦酯组分别为 17.8mmHg(95%可信区间:16.8/18.9)和 9.2mmHg(8.6/9.8),而雷米普利组分别为 15.7mmHg(14.7/16.8)和 7.7mmHg(7.1/8.3)。奥美沙坦酯组的血压正常化率也更高(52.6% vs. 46.0%雷米普利,P<0.05)。在有有效 24 小时动态血压记录的亚组患者(318 例奥美沙坦酯患者和 312 例雷米普利患者)中,24 小时平均 BP 的降低幅度更大(P<0.05),奥美沙坦酯组为 SBP:11.0mmHg(12.2/9.9)和 DBP:6.5mmHg(7.2/5.8),而雷米普利组为 SBP:9.0mmHg(10.2/7.9)和 DBP:5.4mmHg(6.1/4.7)。奥美沙坦酯组的血压降低幅度明显大于雷米普利组,尤其是在最后 6 小时的给药间隔内;奥美沙坦酯组的平滑指数更高,表明 24 小时 BP 控制更均匀。两组患者因药物相关不良事件停药的比例相当(奥美沙坦酯组 3.6% vs. 雷米普利组 3.6%),因不良反应停药的患者数量也相当(奥美沙坦酯组 14 例 vs. 雷米普利组 19 例)。

结论

在老年原发性高血压患者中,奥美沙坦酯可提供有效的、持久的和耐受良好的血压控制,是该年龄组高血压一线治疗药物的一个有用选择。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验