• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

巴西大学生的浪漫偏好:从短期到长期。

Romantic preferences in Brazilian undergraduate students: from the short term to the long term.

机构信息

Department of Physiology, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, Brazil.

出版信息

J Sex Res. 2011 Sep;48(5):479-85. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2010.506680. Epub 2011 May 24.

DOI:10.1080/00224499.2010.506680
PMID:20830643
Abstract

A number of studies have described different preference patterns typically found for men and women when choosing romantic mates. These vary according to the involvement level expected in the relationship. Despite the number of investigations on the topic, one must be careful not to generalize because most studies use samples composed of North American university undergraduates. This study sought to determine if the preference patterns typically found in other countries also occur among Brazilian undergraduates. The importance of characteristics and modifications in preference patterns under gradually restrictive conditions was also investigated. In general, the results obtained suggest that the preferences found in a number of countries also occur in Brazil. In short-term relationships, men prioritize physical attributes, whereas personal traits gain importance when involvement increases. Women in short-term relationships value physical and personal traits, whereas in the long term, they emphasize personal characteristics and their mate's desire to acquire resources. Resource-related traits were less important than the other traits, and were more important for women than for men.

摘要

许多研究描述了男性和女性在选择浪漫伴侣时通常存在的不同偏好模式。这些偏好模式根据关系中预期的参与程度而有所不同。尽管针对这一主题进行了大量研究,但必须注意不要一概而论,因为大多数研究使用的样本都是由北美大学生组成的。本研究旨在确定在其他国家通常发现的偏好模式是否也存在于巴西大学生中。还研究了在逐渐限制的条件下偏好模式的特征和变化的重要性。总的来说,研究结果表明,在许多国家发现的偏好模式也存在于巴西。在短期关系中,男性更注重身体特征,而当参与度增加时,个人特征变得更加重要。在短期关系中,女性重视身体和个人特征,而在长期关系中,她们则强调个人特征和伴侣获取资源的愿望。与资源相关的特征比其他特征重要性低,对女性比男性更重要。

相似文献

1
Romantic preferences in Brazilian undergraduate students: from the short term to the long term.巴西大学生的浪漫偏好:从短期到长期。
J Sex Res. 2011 Sep;48(5):479-85. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2010.506680. Epub 2011 May 24.
2
Intra-sex Variation in Human Mating Strategies: Different People, Different Tactics.人类交配策略中的性别内差异:不同的人,不同的策略。
Arch Sex Behav. 2015 Aug;44(6):1729-36. doi: 10.1007/s10508-015-0533-1. Epub 2015 Apr 21.
3
Homosexual mating preferences from an evolutionary perspective: sexual selection theory revisited.从进化角度看同性恋的交配偏好:重探性选择理论
Arch Sex Behav. 2007 Oct;36(5):717-23. doi: 10.1007/s10508-007-9216-x. Epub 2007 Aug 3.
4
Sex similarities and differences in preferences for short-term mates: what, whether, and why.短期伴侣偏好中的性别异同:是什么、是否存在以及为何如此。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006 Mar;90(3):468-89. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.90.3.468.
5
Early psychosocial stress affects men's relationship length.早期的社会心理压力会影响男性的恋爱关系时长。
J Sex Res. 2009 Jul-Aug;46(4):366-74. doi: 10.1080/00224490902773996.
6
Sex differences in short-term mate preferences and behavioral mimicry: a semi-naturalistic experiment.短期配偶偏好与行为模仿中的性别差异:一项半自然主义实验。
Arch Sex Behav. 2008 Dec;37(6):902-11. doi: 10.1007/s10508-007-9179-y. Epub 2007 Aug 8.
7
Romantic partners in a market perspective: expectations about what ensures a highly desirable partner.从市场角度看浪漫伴侣:对确保拥有极具吸引力伴侣的因素的期望。
Psychol Rep. 2013 Oct;113(2):605-18. doi: 10.2466/21.19.PR0.113x23z6.
8
Suppression sours sacrifice: emotional and relational costs of suppressing emotions in romantic relationships.压抑使牺牲变苦:情感在浪漫关系中被压抑的情绪和关系代价。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2012 Jun;38(6):707-20. doi: 10.1177/0146167212437249. Epub 2012 Mar 2.
9
Emotional and physical satisfaction in noncohabiting, cohabiting, and marital relationships: the importance of jealous conflict.非同居、同居和婚姻关系中的情感和身体满足:嫉妒冲突的重要性。
J Sex Res. 2011 Jan;48(1):29-42. doi: 10.1080/00224490903370602.
10
Media depictions of physical and relational aggression: connections with aggression in young adults' romantic relationships.媒体对身体和关系攻击的描述:与年轻人浪漫关系中攻击行为的关联。
Aggress Behav. 2011 Jan-Feb;37(1):56-62. doi: 10.1002/ab.20372.

引用本文的文献

1
Iranian postmenopausal women's perspectives on sexual satisfaction: A qualitative study.伊朗绝经后女性对性满意度的看法:一项定性研究。
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 23;20(7):e0326188. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0326188. eCollection 2025.
2
What Do Different People Look for in a Partner? Effects of Sex, Sexual Orientation, and Mating Strategies on Partner Preferences.不同的人在伴侣身上寻找什么?性别、性取向和交配策略对伴侣偏好的影响。
Arch Sex Behav. 2024 Mar;53(3):981-1000. doi: 10.1007/s10508-023-02767-4. Epub 2024 Feb 27.
3
A Psychometric Evaluation of the Intrasexual Competition Scale.
《同性别竞争量表的心理计量学评估》。
Arch Sex Behav. 2022 Aug;51(6):2741-2758. doi: 10.1007/s10508-021-02167-6. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
4
Male Mating Expectations in Brazilian and American Samples.巴西和美国样本中的男性交配期望。
Front Psychol. 2021 Feb 10;12:617754. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.617754. eCollection 2021.
5
Norwegian Men and Women Value Similar Mate Traits in Short-Term Relationships.挪威男女在短期关系中看重相似的伴侣特征。
Evol Psychol. 2020 Oct-Dec;18(4):1474704920979623. doi: 10.1177/1474704920979623.
6
The Actor, Partner, Similarity Effects of Personality, and Interactions with Gender and Relationship Duration among Chinese Emerging Adults.中国新兴成年人中的行为者、伴侣、人格相似性效应以及与性别和恋爱时长的相互作用
Front Psychol. 2017 Sep 29;8:1698. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01698. eCollection 2017.
7
Short-term positive and negative consequences of sex based on daily reports among college students.基于大学生日常报告的性行为短期正、负后果。
J Sex Res. 2012;49(6):558-69. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2011.589101. Epub 2011 Jun 27.