• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国新兴成年人中的行为者、伴侣、人格相似性效应以及与性别和恋爱时长的相互作用

The Actor, Partner, Similarity Effects of Personality, and Interactions with Gender and Relationship Duration among Chinese Emerging Adults.

作者信息

Zhou Yixin, Wang Kexin, Chen Shuang, Zhang Jianxin, Zhou Mingjie

机构信息

CAS Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.

Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2017 Sep 29;8:1698. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01698. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01698
PMID:29033878
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5626872/
Abstract

Understanding personality effects and their role in influencing relationship quality, varied according to gender and relationship duration, could help us better understand close relationships. Participants were Chinese dating dyads and were asked to complete both the Big Five Inventory and Perceived Relationship Quality Component scales. Males and those who had a long-term relationship perceived better relationship quality; individuals who scored higher on agreeableness, conscientiousness, openness, and emotional stability enjoyed better relationship quality; gender and/or relationship duration moderated the actor effect of extraversion and the partner effects of conscientiousness, emotional stability, and openness on relationship quality. Regarding the profile similarity, those couples who were more dissimilar in their profile personality had better relationship quality, especially when they were in a relatively long-term relationship. Meanwhile, with an increase in profile similarity, the males' perceived relationship quality decreased.

摘要

了解人格效应及其在影响关系质量方面的作用(这种作用因性别和关系持续时间而异),有助于我们更好地理解亲密关系。参与者是中国情侣,他们被要求完成大五人格量表和关系质量感知分量表。男性以及处于长期关系中的人感知到更好的关系质量;在宜人性、尽责性、开放性和情绪稳定性方面得分较高的个体享有更好的关系质量;性别和/或关系持续时间调节了外向性的主效应以及尽责性、情绪稳定性和开放性对关系质量的伴侣效应。关于轮廓相似性,那些在轮廓人格上差异较大的情侣关系质量更好,尤其是当他们处于相对长期的关系中时。同时,随着轮廓相似性的增加,男性感知到的关系质量会下降。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44da/5626872/cddaec711c64/fpsyg-08-01698-g0009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44da/5626872/8ddb36b080f4/fpsyg-08-01698-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44da/5626872/b583a775ecfb/fpsyg-08-01698-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44da/5626872/a474f26e8a92/fpsyg-08-01698-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44da/5626872/83b0ea1603f3/fpsyg-08-01698-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44da/5626872/320581bf88ed/fpsyg-08-01698-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44da/5626872/0d7de3ef3c0d/fpsyg-08-01698-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44da/5626872/6d5097aa6f81/fpsyg-08-01698-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44da/5626872/2550b42a1951/fpsyg-08-01698-g0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44da/5626872/cddaec711c64/fpsyg-08-01698-g0009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44da/5626872/8ddb36b080f4/fpsyg-08-01698-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44da/5626872/b583a775ecfb/fpsyg-08-01698-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44da/5626872/a474f26e8a92/fpsyg-08-01698-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44da/5626872/83b0ea1603f3/fpsyg-08-01698-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44da/5626872/320581bf88ed/fpsyg-08-01698-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44da/5626872/0d7de3ef3c0d/fpsyg-08-01698-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44da/5626872/6d5097aa6f81/fpsyg-08-01698-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44da/5626872/2550b42a1951/fpsyg-08-01698-g0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44da/5626872/cddaec711c64/fpsyg-08-01698-g0009.jpg

相似文献

1
The Actor, Partner, Similarity Effects of Personality, and Interactions with Gender and Relationship Duration among Chinese Emerging Adults.中国新兴成年人中的行为者、伴侣、人格相似性效应以及与性别和恋爱时长的相互作用
Front Psychol. 2017 Sep 29;8:1698. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01698. eCollection 2017.
2
Big Five predictors of behavior and perceptions in initial dyadic interactions: personality similarity helps extraverts and introverts, but hurts "disagreeables".初次二元互动中行为和认知的大五人格预测因素:人格相似性对外向者和内向者有帮助,但对“难相处者”有损害。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009 Oct;97(4):667-84. doi: 10.1037/a0015741.
3
[Does the French Big Five Inventory evaluate facets other than the Big Five factors?].[法国大五人格量表是否评估了大五人格因素以外的其他方面?]
Encephale. 2018 Jun;44(3):208-214. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2017.02.004. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
4
Actor, partner, and similarity effects of personality on global and experienced well-being.个性对整体幸福感和体验幸福感的行为者、伴侣及相似性效应。
J Res Pers. 2019 Feb;78:249-261. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2018.12.008. Epub 2018 Dec 24.
5
Social anxiety and the Big Five personality traits: the interactive relationship of trust and openness.社交焦虑与大五人格特质:信任与开放性的交互关系。
Cogn Behav Ther. 2015;44(3):212-22. doi: 10.1080/16506073.2015.1008032. Epub 2015 Feb 23.
6
Effects of big-five personality traits on the quality of relationship and satisfaction in Chinese coach-athlete dyads.大五人格特质对中国教练-运动员二元组中关系质量和满意度的影响。
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2015 Aug;25(4):568-80. doi: 10.1111/sms.12329. Epub 2014 Nov 4.
7
Psychometric Evaluation of Chinese-Language 44-Item and 10-Item Big Five Personality Inventories, Including Correlations with Chronotype, Mindfulness and Mind Wandering.中文版44项和10项大五人格量表的心理测量学评估,包括与昼夜节律类型、正念和走神的相关性
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 26;11(2):e0149963. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149963. eCollection 2016.
8
An Exploratory Investigation of the Role of Openness in Relationship Quality among Emerging Adult Chinese Couples.中国成年初期情侣中开放性在关系质量中的作用的探索性调查。
Front Psychol. 2017 Mar 15;8:382. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00382. eCollection 2017.
9
Predicting relationship and life satisfaction from personality in nationally representative samples from three countries: the relative importance of actor, partner, and similarity effects.在来自三个国家的全国代表性样本中,从人格预测关系和生活满意度:演员、伴侣和相似性效应的相对重要性。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010 Oct;99(4):690-702. doi: 10.1037/a0020385.
10
Long-term stability in the Big Five personality traits in adulthood.成年期大五人格特质的长期稳定性。
Scand J Psychol. 2007 Dec;48(6):511-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2007.00609.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Automatic Inattention to Attractive Alternative Partners Helps Male Heterosexual Chinese College Students Maintain Romantic Relationships.对有吸引力的潜在伴侣自动忽视有助于中国异性恋男大学生维持恋爱关系。
Front Psychol. 2019 Jul 18;10:1687. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01687. eCollection 2019.
2
Actor, partner, and similarity effects of personality on global and experienced well-being.个性对整体幸福感和体验幸福感的行为者、伴侣及相似性效应。
J Res Pers. 2019 Feb;78:249-261. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2018.12.008. Epub 2018 Dec 24.

本文引用的文献

1
An Exploratory Investigation of the Role of Openness in Relationship Quality among Emerging Adult Chinese Couples.中国成年初期情侣中开放性在关系质量中的作用的探索性调查。
Front Psychol. 2017 Mar 15;8:382. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00382. eCollection 2017.
2
Machiavellianism and Adult Attachment in General Interpersonal Relationships and Close Relationships.权谋主义与一般人际关系和亲密关系中的成人依恋
Eur J Psychol. 2015 Feb 27;11(1):139-54. doi: 10.5964/ejop.v11i1.801. eCollection 2015 Feb.
3
Hidden multiplicity in exploratory multiway ANOVA: Prevalence and remedies.
探索性多向方差分析中的隐藏多重性:发生率与补救措施。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2016 Apr;23(2):640-7. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0913-5.
4
Attentional Biases toward Attractive Alternatives and Rivals: Mechanisms Involved in Relationship Maintenance among Chinese Women.对有吸引力的替代对象和竞争对手的注意偏向:中国女性关系维持中的相关机制
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 26;10(8):e0136662. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136662. eCollection 2015.
5
The Power of Personality: The Comparative Validity of Personality Traits, Socioeconomic Status, and Cognitive Ability for Predicting Important Life Outcomes.人格的力量:人格特质、社会经济地位和认知能力在预测重要人生结果方面的比较效度
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2007 Dec;2(4):313-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00047.x.
6
How are personality trait and profile agreement related?人格特质与轮廓一致性是如何相关的?
Front Psychol. 2015 Jun 9;6:785. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00785. eCollection 2015.
7
Why do personality traits predict divorce? Multiple pathways through satisfaction.为什么人格特质可以预测离婚?满意度的多种作用途径。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2014 Jun;106(6):978-96. doi: 10.1037/a0036190.
8
How large are actor and partner effects of personality on relationship satisfaction? The importance of controlling for shared method variance.人格对关系满意度的演员和伴侣效应有多大?控制共同方法偏差的重要性。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2013 Oct;39(10):1359-72. doi: 10.1177/0146167213492429. Epub 2013 Jun 24.
9
The Mini-IPIP Scale: psychometric features and relations with PTSD symptoms of Chinese earthquake survivors.简易国际人格项目池量表:中国地震幸存者的心理测量特征及其与创伤后应激障碍症状的关系。
Psychol Rep. 2012 Oct;111(2):641-51. doi: 10.2466/16.12.15.PR0.111.5.641-651.
10
Romantic preferences in Brazilian undergraduate students: from the short term to the long term.巴西大学生的浪漫偏好:从短期到长期。
J Sex Res. 2011 Sep;48(5):479-85. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2010.506680. Epub 2011 May 24.