• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

荷兰对自愿不育的公众接受度:30年间从20%升至90%。

The Public Acceptance of Voluntary Childlessness in the Netherlands: from 20 to 90 per cent in 30 years.

作者信息

Noordhuizen Suzanne, de Graaf Paul, Sieben Inge

机构信息

Tilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands.

出版信息

Soc Indic Res. 2010 Oct;99(1):163-181. doi: 10.1007/s11205-010-9574-y. Epub 2010 Jan 16.

DOI:10.1007/s11205-010-9574-y
PMID:20835394
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2931764/
Abstract

Within a relatively short period of 30 years, public acceptance of voluntary childlessness has increased enormously in the Netherlands. In this paper, we address two research questions, which we answer with data from 13 waves of the repeated cross-sectional survey Cultural Change in the Netherlands (CCN, 1965-1996). First, we investigate to what extent the increasing permissiveness is due to cohort replacement and to intra-cohort change. We find that between 1965 and 1980 the change is primarily due to intra-cohort (period) effects, whereas cohort replacement has become more important since 1980. Second, we address the question which social categories constitute the 10% of the population who do not accept voluntary childlessness. Church attendance-and not religiosity or religious socialization-turns out to be the most important factor. Low levels of income and education also negatively affect the acceptance of voluntary childless.

摘要

在短短30年的时间里,荷兰公众对自愿不育的接受程度大幅提高。在本文中,我们提出了两个研究问题,并利用荷兰文化变迁重复横断面调查(CCN,1965 - 1996年)13轮的数据进行解答。首先,我们研究宽容度增加在多大程度上归因于代际更替和代内变化。我们发现,1965年至1980年间的变化主要归因于代内(时期)效应,而自1980年以来代际更替变得更为重要。其次,我们探讨哪些社会类别构成了不接受自愿不育的10%的人口。结果表明,去教堂做礼拜——而非宗教信仰或宗教社会化——是最重要的因素。低收入和低教育水平也对自愿不育的接受产生负面影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebd3/2931764/581669aa1609/11205_2010_9574_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebd3/2931764/7dda97b614ab/11205_2010_9574_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebd3/2931764/581669aa1609/11205_2010_9574_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebd3/2931764/7dda97b614ab/11205_2010_9574_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebd3/2931764/581669aa1609/11205_2010_9574_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The Public Acceptance of Voluntary Childlessness in the Netherlands: from 20 to 90 per cent in 30 years.荷兰对自愿不育的公众接受度:30年间从20%升至90%。
Soc Indic Res. 2010 Oct;99(1):163-181. doi: 10.1007/s11205-010-9574-y. Epub 2010 Jan 16.
2
Religious homogamy and voluntary childlessness in Canada.加拿大的宗教同质性与自愿不育
Sociol Perspect. 1993 Spring;36(1):83-93.
3
Voluntary childlessness among American men and women in the late 1980's.20世纪80年代末美国男性和女性的自愿不育现象。
Soc Biol. 1991 Spring-Summer;38(1-2):79-93. doi: 10.1080/19485565.1991.9988773.
4
Normative and microeconomic models of voluntary childlessness.自愿不育的规范模型和微观经济模型。
Sociol Spectr. 1984;4(2-3):209-28. doi: 10.1080/02732173.1984.9981719.
5
Effective factors on voluntary childlessness and one-child tendency from couples' perspective: Compulsory childlessness or child-avoidance?从夫妻角度看影响自愿不育和一孩倾向的因素:强制不育还是避免生育?
Caspian J Intern Med. 2023 Fall;14(4):656-667. doi: 10.22088/cjim.14.4.656.
6
Orientations towards voluntary childlessness.对自愿不生育的倾向。
J Biosoc Sci. 1983 Apr;15(2):153-64. doi: 10.1017/s0021932000014449.
7
Childless elderly: Theoretical perspectives and practical concerns.无子女的老年人:理论观点与实际关切
J Cross Cult Gerontol. 1987 Jan;2(1):1-14. doi: 10.1007/BF00117173.
8
Voluntary childlessness. Toward a theoretical integration.
J Fam Issues. 1982 Dec;3(4):459-72. doi: 10.1177/019251382003004003.
9
The choice of sterilization: voluntarily childless couples, mothers of one child by choice, and males seeking reversal of vasectomy.绝育的选择对象:自愿不育的夫妇、自愿只生育一个孩子的母亲以及寻求输精管复通术的男性。
J Biosoc Sci. 1984 Apr;16(2):241-8. doi: 10.1017/s0021932000015017.
10
[Netherlands Fertility Survey 1982: choosing a family size].[1982年荷兰生育调查:选择家庭规模]
Maandstat Bevolking. 1985 Sep;33(9):49-59.

引用本文的文献

1
English validation of the Multidimensional Scale of Motives for Postponing Parenthood (MSMPP-18-EN): Factorial structure, psychometric properties, and correlates.推迟生育动机多维量表(MSMPP - 18 - EN)的英文验证:因子结构、心理测量特性及相关因素
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 18;20(8):e0329404. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0329404. eCollection 2025.
2
Societal pessimism and trajectories of fertility expectations among Dutch non-parents.荷兰非父母群体中的社会悲观情绪与生育期望轨迹
Genus. 2025;81(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s41118-025-00246-3. Epub 2025 May 12.
3
Measuring attitudes towards voluntary childlessness: Indicators in European comparative surveys.

本文引用的文献

1
Pathways into childlessness: evidence of gendered life course dynamics.无子女的成因:性别化生命历程动态的证据
J Biosoc Sci. 2008 Nov;40(6):863-78. doi: 10.1017/S0021932007002660. Epub 2007 Dec 20.
2
Religious differentials in marital fertility in The Hague (Netherlands) 1860-1909.
Popul Stud (Camb). 2006 Mar;60(1):23-38. doi: 10.1080/00324720500430758.
3
Europe's second demographic transition.欧洲的第二次人口转变。
Popul Bull. 1987 Mar;42(1):1-59.
衡量对自愿不生育的态度:欧洲比较调查中的指标
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 19;20(3):e0319081. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319081. eCollection 2025.
4
What is driving the global decline of human fertility? Need for a multidisciplinary approach to the underlying mechanisms.是什么导致了全球人类生育率的下降?需要采用多学科方法研究其潜在机制。
Front Reprod Health. 2024 Apr 25;6:1364352. doi: 10.3389/frph.2024.1364352. eCollection 2024.
5
Population decline: where demography, social science, and biology intersect.人口减少:人口统计学、社会科学和生物学的交汇点。
Reproduction. 2024 May 31;168(1). doi: 10.1530/REP-24-0070. Print 2024 Jul 1.
6
The Global Decline in Human Fertility: The Post-Transition Trap Hypothesis.全球人类生育率下降:后转型陷阱假说
Life (Basel). 2024 Mar 11;14(3):369. doi: 10.3390/life14030369.
7
Explaining uncertainty in women's fertility preferences.解释女性生育偏好中的不确定性。
Heliyon. 2024 Mar 11;10(6):e27610. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27610. eCollection 2024 Mar 30.
8
Becoming a Grandparent and Its Effect on Well-Being: The Role of Order of Transitions, Time, and Gender.成为祖父母及其对幸福感的影响:转变顺序、时间和性别角色的作用。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2020 Nov 13;75(10):2250-2262. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbz135.
9
The Decline in Marriage in Israel, 1960-2007: Period or Cohort Effect?1960 - 2007年以色列婚姻状况的下降:时期效应还是队列效应?
Eur J Popul. 2018 Jan 3;34(1):119-142. doi: 10.1007/s10680-017-9457-x. eCollection 2018 Feb.
4
Development of attitude strength over the life cycle: surge and decline.态度强度在生命周期中的发展:起伏与衰退。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998 Dec;75(6):1389-410. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.75.6.1389.
5
The cohort as a concept in the study of social change.作为社会变革研究概念的队列。
Am Sociol Rev. 1965 Dec;30(6):843-61.