Department of Colorectal Surgery, University College London Hospital, 250 Euston Road, London NW1 2PG, UK.
Surg Endosc. 2011 Apr;25(4):1062-4. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1316-3. Epub 2010 Sep 11.
Numerous surgical options exist for the correction of rectal prolapse, with the optimal choice remaining controversial. The laparoscopic approach has proved to be popular and effective. Concern exists about nonresectional rectopexy in the form of intractable postoperative constipation. The authors present their experience with nonresectional laparoscopic suture rectopexy.
All patients presenting with a full-thickness rectal prolapse between August 1994 and August 2009 who proved to be fit for a general anesthesia were offered a laparoscopic repair. Data were entered into a database, then prospectively and retrospectively analyzed. The data recorded included patient demographics, preoperative symptoms, conversion to open procedure, length of hospital stay, and postoperative complications. Preoperative Cleveland Clinic Incontinence Scores (CCIS) were calculated. Follow-up evaluation was by telephone questionnaire. Postoperative constipation, recurrence, and CCIS were noted.
The series included 72 patients (71 women, 98%) with a median age of 72 years (range, 24-88 years). The median follow-up period was 48 months (range, 5-144 months). A total of 13 patients were lost to follow-up evaluation. The median operating time was 98 min (range, 35-200 min), and the median hospital stay was 2 days (range, 1-29 days). Three conversions to open procedure (5%) were performed. The median preoperative CCIS was 9.54 compared with 4.44 postoperatively (p = 0.024). The complications included one postoperative bleed requiring transfusion, one port-site abscess requiring incision and drainage, one postoperative retention of urine, and one chest infection. Postoperatively, 10 patients (17%) reported occasional constipation not requiring intervention, and an additional 10 patients (17%) reported more severe constipation, all managed successfully with regular laxatives. The patients followed up experienced six recurrences (9%). No postoperative deaths occurred.
Laparoscopic abdominal suture rectopexy without resection is safe and effective for the treatment of full-thickness rectal prolapse.
直肠脱垂有多种手术治疗方法,然而最佳选择仍存在争议。腹腔镜手术已经被证实是一种有效且受欢迎的方法。人们担心非切除性直肠固定术会导致术后难以治疗的便秘。作者介绍了他们在非切除性腹腔镜缝合直肠固定术中的经验。
1994 年 8 月至 2009 年 8 月期间,所有经证实适合全身麻醉的完全性直肠脱垂患者均被建议接受腹腔镜修复手术。将数据输入数据库,然后进行前瞻性和回顾性分析。记录的数据包括患者人口统计学、术前症状、转为开放性手术、住院时间和术后并发症。计算术前克利夫兰诊所失禁评分(CCIS)。通过电话问卷进行随访评估。记录术后便秘、复发和 CCIS。
该系列包括 72 例患者(71 名女性,98%),平均年龄 72 岁(范围,24-88 岁)。中位随访时间为 48 个月(范围,5-144 个月)。共有 13 例患者失访。中位手术时间为 98 分钟(范围,35-200 分钟),中位住院时间为 2 天(范围,1-29 天)。有 3 例(5%)转为开放性手术。术前 CCIS 中位数为 9.54,术后为 4.44(p=0.024)。并发症包括 1 例术后出血需要输血,1 例切口脓肿需要切开引流,1 例术后尿潴留,1 例肺部感染。术后,10 例(17%)患者报告偶尔出现无需干预的便秘,另外 10 例(17%)患者报告更严重的便秘,均通过常规泻药成功治疗。随访的患者中有 6 例(9%)复发。无术后死亡发生。
腹腔镜腹部缝合直肠固定术不切除是一种安全有效的治疗完全性直肠脱垂的方法。