• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Risk stratification for hospitalization in acute asthma: the CHOP classification tree.急性哮喘住院风险分层:CHOP 分类树。
Am J Emerg Med. 2010 Sep;28(7):803-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2009.04.009. Epub 2010 Mar 25.
2
Predicting need for hospitalization in acute pediatric asthma.预测小儿急性哮喘的住院需求
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2008 Nov;24(11):735-44. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e31818c268f.
3
Initial oxygen saturation as a predictor of admission in children presenting to the emergency department with acute asthma.初始血氧饱和度作为急诊科急性哮喘患儿入院的预测指标。
Ann Emerg Med. 2002 Sep;40(3):300-7. doi: 10.1067/mem.2002.126813.
4
Development and validation of a risk-adjustment tool in acute asthma.急性哮喘风险调整工具的开发与验证
Health Serv Res. 2009 Oct;44(5 Pt 1):1701-17. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.00998.x. Epub 2009 Jul 13.
5
Acute asthma among adults presenting to the emergency department: the role of race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status.到急诊科就诊的成年急性哮喘患者:种族/族裔和社会经济地位的作用。
Chest. 2003 Sep;124(3):803-12. doi: 10.1378/chest.124.3.803.
6
Early prediction of poor response in acute asthma patients in the emergency department.急诊科急性哮喘患者反应不佳的早期预测
Chest. 1998 Oct;114(4):1016-21. doi: 10.1378/chest.114.4.1016.
7
Predicting hospital admission and returns to the emergency department for elderly patients.预测老年患者住院和返回急诊科的情况。
Acad Emerg Med. 2010 Mar;17(3):252-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00675.x.
8
A decision tree to assess short-term mortality after an emergency department visit for an exacerbation of COPD: a cohort study.用于评估慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期急诊就诊后短期死亡率的决策树:一项队列研究。
Respir Res. 2015 Dec 22;16:151. doi: 10.1186/s12931-015-0313-4.
9
A new index for early prediction of hospitalization in patients with acute asthma.一种用于急性哮喘患者住院早期预测的新指标。
Am J Emerg Med. 1997 Jan;15(1):8-13. doi: 10.1016/s0735-6757(97)90039-5.
10
Effect of out-of-hospital albuterol inhalation treatments on patient comfort and morbidity.院外使用沙丁胺醇吸入治疗对患者舒适度和发病率的影响。
Ann Emerg Med. 1994 Nov;24(5):873-8. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(94)70205-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of a Vendor Predictive Model for the Risk of Pediatric Asthma Exacerbation: A Difference-in-Differences Analysis.供应商预测模型在儿童哮喘恶化风险中的有效性:差异中的差异分析。
Appl Clin Inform. 2023 Oct;14(5):932-943. doi: 10.1055/a-2184-6481. Epub 2023 Sep 29.
2
Implementation of digital home monitoring and management of respiratory disease.实施呼吸疾病的数字家庭监测和管理。
Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2023 Jul 1;29(4):302-312. doi: 10.1097/MCP.0000000000000965. Epub 2023 May 2.
3
Lymph node metastases >5 and metastatic lymph node ratio >0.30 of differentiated thyroid cancer predict response to radioactive iodine.分化型甲状腺癌的淋巴结转移大于 5 个且转移淋巴结比例大于 0.30 预测对放射性碘的反应。
Cancer Med. 2021 Nov;10(21):7610-7619. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4288. Epub 2021 Oct 8.
4
Development of a diagnostic decision tree for obstructive pulmonary diseases based on real-life data.基于实际数据的阻塞性肺疾病诊断决策树的开发。
ERJ Open Res. 2016 Jan 22;2(1). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00077-2015. eCollection 2016 Jan.
5
Personalized Modeling for Prediction with Decision-Path Models.使用决策路径模型进行预测的个性化建模
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 22;10(6):e0131022. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131022. eCollection 2015.
6
Acute Asthma Intensity Research Score: updated performance characteristics for prediction of hospitalization and lung function.急性哮喘严重程度研究评分:预测住院和肺功能的更新性能特征
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2015 Jul;115(1):69-70. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2015.03.020. Epub 2015 Apr 15.
7
Effect of acetylcholinesterase (AChE) point-of-care testing in OP poisoning on knowledge, attitudes and practices of treating physicians in Sri Lanka.有机磷中毒时乙酰胆碱酯酶即时检测对斯里兰卡治疗医师的知识、态度和实践的影响
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Mar 4;14:104. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-104.
8
Novel insights in the fecal egg count reduction test for monitoring drug efficacy against soil-transmitted helminths in large-scale treatment programs.在大规模治疗项目中监测抗土壤传播性蠕虫药物疗效的粪便卵计数减少试验的新见解。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2011 Dec;5(12):e1427. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001427. Epub 2011 Dec 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Quality of care for acute asthma in 63 US emergency departments.美国63家急诊科急性哮喘的护理质量。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009 Feb;123(2):354-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2008.10.051. Epub 2008 Dec 13.
2
Global strategy for asthma management and prevention: GINA executive summary.哮喘管理和预防全球战略:全球哮喘防治创议执行摘要
Eur Respir J. 2008 Jan;31(1):143-78. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00138707.
3
The National Emergency Department Safety Study: study rationale and design.国家急诊科安全研究:研究原理与设计
Acad Emerg Med. 2007 Dec;14(12):1182-9. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2007.07.014.
4
Expert Panel Report 3 (EPR-3): Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma-Summary Report 2007.专家小组报告3(EPR-3):哮喘诊断和管理指南——2007年总结报告
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007 Nov;120(5 Suppl):S94-138. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2007.09.043.
5
National surveillance for asthma--United States, 1980-2004.美国1980 - 2004年哮喘病国家监测
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2007 Oct 19;56(8):1-54.
6
Risk stratification for in-hospital mortality in spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage: a Classification and Regression Tree analysis.自发性脑出血患者院内死亡的风险分层:一项分类与回归树分析
QJM. 2006 Nov;99(11):743-50. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcl107. Epub 2006 Oct 9.
7
Using an asthma control questionnaire and administrative data to predict health-care utilization.使用哮喘控制问卷和管理数据来预测医疗保健利用率。
Chest. 2006 Apr;129(4):918-24. doi: 10.1378/chest.129.4.918.
8
Clinical decision rules for secondary trauma triage: predictors of emergency operative management.继发性创伤分诊的临床决策规则:急诊手术治疗的预测因素
Ann Emerg Med. 2006 Feb;47(2):135. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2005.10.018. Epub 2006 Jan 4.
9
Prospective multicenter study of acute asthma in younger versus older adults presenting to the emergency department.急诊科年轻与老年急性哮喘患者前瞻性多中心研究。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006 Jan;54(1):48-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.00563.x.
10
Improved detection of prostate cancer using classification and regression tree analysis.使用分类与回归树分析改进前列腺癌的检测
J Clin Oncol. 2005 Jul 1;23(19):4322-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.11.136. Epub 2005 Mar 21.

急性哮喘住院风险分层:CHOP 分类树。

Risk stratification for hospitalization in acute asthma: the CHOP classification tree.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA.

出版信息

Am J Emerg Med. 2010 Sep;28(7):803-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2009.04.009. Epub 2010 Mar 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajem.2009.04.009
PMID:20837258
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2939861/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Simple risk stratification rules are limited in acute asthma. We developed and externally validated a classification tree for asthma hospitalization.

METHODS

Data were obtained from 2 large, multicenter studies on acute asthma, the National Emergency Department Safety Study and the Multicenter Airway Research Collaboration cohorts. Both studies involved emergency department (ED) patients aged 18 to 54 years presenting to the ED with acute asthma. Clinical information was obtained from medical record review. The Classification and Regression Tree method was used to generate a simple decision tree. The tree was derived in the National Emergency Department Safety Study cohort and then was validated in the Multicenter Airway Research Collaboration cohort.

RESULTS

There were 1825 patients in the derivation cohort and 1335 in the validation cohort. Admission rates were 18% and 21% in the derivation and validation cohorts, respectively. The Classification and Regression Tree method identified 4 important variables (CHOP): change [C] in peak expiratory flow severity category, ever hospitalization [H] for asthma, oxygen [O] saturation on room air, and initial peak expiratory flow [P]. In a simple 3-step process, the decision rule risk-stratified patients into 7 groups, with a risk of admission ranging from 9% to 48%. The classification tree performed satisfactorily on discrimination in both the derivation and validation cohorts, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.72 and 0.65, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

We developed and externally validated a novel classification tree for hospitalization among ED patients with acute asthma. Use of this explicit risk stratification rule may aid decision making in the emergency care of acute asthma.

摘要

目的

简单的风险分层规则在急性哮喘中受到限制。我们开发并外部验证了一种用于哮喘住院的分类树。

方法

数据来自两项关于急性哮喘的大型多中心研究,即国家急诊部安全研究和多中心气道研究合作队列。这两项研究均涉及到年龄在 18 至 54 岁之间因急性哮喘到急诊就诊的急诊患者。临床信息从病历回顾中获得。使用分类和回归树方法生成简单的决策树。该树是在国家急诊部安全研究队列中得出的,然后在多中心气道研究合作队列中进行验证。

结果

推导队列中有 1825 名患者,验证队列中有 1335 名患者。入院率分别为推导队列的 18%和验证队列的 21%。分类和回归树方法确定了 4 个重要变量(CHOP):呼气峰值流量严重程度类别的变化[C]、哮喘住院史[H]、空气氧饱和度[O]和初始呼气峰值流量[P]。通过一个简单的三步过程,决策规则将患者分为 7 组,入院风险从 9%到 48%不等。分类树在推导和验证队列中的区分度表现良好,其接收者操作特征曲线下面积分别为 0.72 和 0.65。

结论

我们开发并外部验证了一种用于急诊科急性哮喘患者住院的新型分类树。使用这种明确的风险分层规则可能有助于急性哮喘的急诊护理决策。