Suppr超能文献

职业久坐与健康风险:系统综述。

Occupational sitting and health risks: a systematic review.

机构信息

School of Human Movement Studies, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.

出版信息

Am J Prev Med. 2010 Oct;39(4):379-88. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.05.024.

Abstract

CONTEXT

Emerging evidence suggests that sedentary behavior (i.e., time spent sitting) may be negatively associated with health. The aim of this study was to systematically review the evidence on associations between occupational sitting and health risks.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

Studies were identified in March-April 2009 by literature searches in PubMed, PsycINFO, CENTRAL, CINAHL, EMBASE, and PEDro, with subsequent related-article searches in PubMed and citation searches in Web of Science. Identified studies were categorized by health outcome. Two independent reviewers assessed methodologic quality using a 15-item quality rating list (score range 0-15 points, higher score indicating better quality). Data on study design, study population, measures of occupational sitting, health risks, analyses, and results were extracted.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

43 papers met the inclusion criteria (21% cross-sectional, 14% case-control, 65% prospective); they examined the associations between occupational sitting and BMI (n=12); cancer (n=17); cardiovascular disease (CVD, n=8); diabetes mellitus (DM, n=4); and mortality (n=6). The median study-quality score was 12 points. Half the cross-sectional studies showed a positive association between occupational sitting and BMI, but prospective studies failed to confirm a causal relationship. There was some case-control evidence for a positive association between occupational sitting and cancer; however, this was generally not supported by prospective studies. The majority of prospective studies found that occupational sitting was associated with a higher risk of DM and mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Limited evidence was found to support a positive relationship between occupational sitting and health risks. The heterogeneity of study designs, measures, and findings makes it difficult to draw definitive conclusions at this time.

摘要

背景

越来越多的证据表明,久坐行为(即坐着的时间)可能与健康状况呈负相关。本研究旨在系统回顾职业性久坐与健康风险之间关联的证据。

证据收集

2009 年 3 月至 4 月,通过在 PubMed、PsycINFO、CENTRAL、CINAHL、EMBASE 和 PEDro 中进行文献检索,以及随后在 PubMed 中进行相关文章检索和在 Web of Science 中进行引文检索,确定了研究。将确定的研究按健康结果进行分类。两位独立的评审员使用 15 项质量评分表(评分范围 0-15 分,得分越高表示质量越高)评估方法学质量。提取研究设计、研究人群、职业性久坐措施、健康风险、分析和结果数据。

证据综合

43 篇论文符合纳入标准(21%为横断面研究,14%为病例对照研究,65%为前瞻性研究);它们考察了职业性久坐与 BMI(n=12)、癌症(n=17)、心血管疾病(CVD,n=8)、糖尿病(DM,n=4)和死亡率(n=6)之间的关联。中位研究质量评分为 12 分。半数横断面研究显示职业性久坐与 BMI 之间呈正相关,但前瞻性研究未能证实因果关系。有一些病例对照研究证据表明职业性久坐与癌症之间存在正相关关系;然而,这通常得不到前瞻性研究的支持。大多数前瞻性研究发现职业性久坐与糖尿病和死亡率风险增加有关。

结论

目前仅有有限的证据支持职业性久坐与健康风险之间存在正相关关系。研究设计、测量和发现的异质性使得目前难以得出明确的结论。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验