University of Illinois at Chicago, 60612-7350, USA.
Health Educ Res. 2010 Dec;25(6):965-78. doi: 10.1093/her/cyq049. Epub 2010 Sep 13.
This paper reports the process evaluation of a peer group intervention for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) prevention which had positive outcomes for three target groups in Malawi: rural adults, adolescents and urban hospital workers. The six-session intervention was delivered to small groups of 10-12 participants by 85 trained volunteer peer leaders working in pairs. A descriptive, observational mixed methods design was used with a convenience sample of 294 intervention sessions. Using project records and a conceptually based observation guide, we examined five aspects of the implementation process. The context was favorable, but privacy to discuss sensitive issues was a concern for some groups. In study communities, program reach was 58% of rural adults, 70% of adolescents and nearly all hospital workers. Session records confirmed that all peer groups received the intended six sessions (dose delivered). The dose received was high, as evidenced by high participant engagement in peer group activities. Peer leaders were rated above the median for three indicators of peer group content and process fidelity: session management skills, interpersonal facilitation skills and whether more like a peer group than classroom. Documenting that this HIV prevention peer group intervention was delivered as intended by trained peer volunteers supports widespread dissemination of the intervention.
本文报告了一项针对人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)预防的同伴群体干预的过程评估,该干预在马拉维三个目标群体中取得了积极成果:农村成年人、青少年和城市医院工作人员。该六节干预课程由 85 名经过培训的志愿同伴领袖以两人一组的形式向 10-12 名参与者的小团体提供。采用描述性、观察性混合方法设计,对 294 个干预课程进行了便利抽样。利用项目记录和基于概念的观察指南,我们考察了实施过程的五个方面。当时的环境非常有利,但一些群体对讨论敏感问题的隐私问题表示担忧。在研究社区中,该项目覆盖了 58%的农村成年人、70%的青少年和几乎所有的医院工作人员。课程记录证实,所有的同伴小组都接受了预期的六节课程(即给予了预期的剂量)。由于同伴小组活动中参与者的高度参与,证明了所给予的剂量很高。同伴领袖在三个同伴小组内容和过程保真度指标上的评分均高于中位数:课程管理技能、人际促进技能以及是否更像同伴小组而不是课堂。记录表明,经过培训的同伴志愿者提供了这种 HIV 预防同伴小组干预,这支持了该干预的广泛传播。