Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Behav Res Ther. 2010 Nov;48(11):1155-9. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2010.08.001. Epub 2010 Aug 11.
The purpose of this report is to examine relations between extreme thinking, as measured by the Dysfunctional Attitudes Scale, and the maintenance of gains among adolescents who participated in the Treatment for Adolescents with Depression Study (TADS). We examine extreme thinking among 327 adolescents (mean age=14.56, 57% female, 75% White) who received cognitive behavior therapy (CBT), fluoxetine (FLX), or a combination of CBT and FLX (COMB). Among those who met remission status on the Children's Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R≤28; 56 at week 12, 79 at week 18) extreme thinking did not predict failure to maintain remission. This is in contrast to findings with depressed adults. Treatment influenced level of extreme thinking, and this appeared to be driven by greater endorsement of positively valenced beliefs as opposed to a decrease in negatively valenced beliefs. Developmental or investigation characteristics may account for the discrepancy in findings.
本报告的目的是研究在接受抑郁症青少年治疗研究(TADS)的青少年中,以功能失调态度量表(DAS)衡量的极端思维与保持收益之间的关系。我们研究了 327 名青少年(平均年龄为 14.56 岁,57%为女性,75%为白人)的极端思维,他们接受了认知行为疗法(CBT)、氟西汀(FLX)或 CBT 和 FLX 的组合治疗(COMB)。在那些符合儿童抑郁评定量表修订版(CDRS-R≤28;12 周时为 56 人,18 周时为 79 人)缓解状态的患者中,极端思维并不能预测无法维持缓解。这与抑郁成年人的发现相反。治疗影响了极端思维的水平,这似乎是由于积极价值信念的认可程度增加,而不是消极价值信念的减少所致。发展或调查特征可能解释了这一差异。