Department of Psychology, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive N. W. Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2N1N4.
Behav Res Ther. 2010 Apr;48(4):266-74. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2009.12.007. Epub 2009 Dec 24.
Although the efficacy of Cognitive Therapy (CT) for depression is well documented, questions remain about the conditions under which CT is maximally effective, and the mechanisms by which CT is efficacious. This study examined the role of extreme responding (ER) as a mediator and predictor of relapse, as well as a predictor of acute treatment outcome. To test mediation, ER of participants in CT was compared to ER of participants receiving Behavioral Activation (BA). Results indicated that ER was not a mediator of relapse in either condition. Both CT and BA showed reductions in depression severity, however neither group showed significant changes in ER over the course of treatment. Finally, ER did not predict or moderate acute treatment outcome. The implications of these results, strengths and limitations of the current study, and future research directions are discussed.
尽管认知疗法(CT)治疗抑郁症的疗效已有充分的文献记载,但仍存在一些问题,例如在哪些情况下 CT 最有效,以及 CT 发挥疗效的机制是什么。本研究考察了极端反应(ER)作为复发的中介和预测因素,以及急性治疗结果的预测因素的作用。为了检验中介作用,将 CT 组参与者的 ER 与接受行为激活(BA)治疗的参与者的 ER 进行了比较。结果表明,在任何一种情况下,ER 都不是复发的中介因素。CT 和 BA 都显示出抑郁严重程度的降低,但是在治疗过程中,两组的 ER 均未发生显著变化。最后,ER 既不能预测也不能调节急性治疗效果。讨论了这些结果的意义、当前研究的优势和局限性以及未来的研究方向。