• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

积极和消极的浪漫关系质量:年龄、熟悉程度、依恋和幸福感是夫妻一致性和投射的相关因素。

Positive and negative romantic relationship quality: age, familiarity, attachment and well-being as correlates of couple agreement and projection.

机构信息

Griffith University, School of Psychology and Griffith Health Institute, Behavioural Basis of Health, Australia.

出版信息

J Adolesc. 2010 Dec;33(6):879-90. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2010.07.008. Epub 2010 Sep 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.adolescence.2010.07.008
PMID:20843545
Abstract

Capturing the multiple aspects of the romantic peer context is a significant challenge for research. One often recommended option is to use reports of multiple relationship features from both members of the romantic dyad. Using a new measure, we extended an existing model of dyadic perception (Kenny & Acitelli, 2001) to investigate associations between couples' (N = 148) reports about the positive and negative dimensions of their romantic relationships. Differences by participant age and relationship length were examined to test developmental hypotheses, and attachment and well-being were examined as correlates of participants' romantic perceptions. Agreement between partners was low, but associations of individuals' reports about themselves and their partners were high (projection). Agreement about negative romantic behaviors was higher in older compared to younger individuals and agreement about positive behaviors was higher in longer compared to shorter relationships. Partner similarity in negative behavior was higher than similarity in positive behavior. Individuals with better well-being reported more positive romantic behaviors, and attachment security was associated in some cases. Males were more negative about romantic behaviors than females, but there was no gender difference in agreement or projection.

摘要

捕捉浪漫同伴关系的多个方面是研究的一个重大挑战。一种常用的推荐方法是使用浪漫关系双方的多项关系特征的报告。我们使用一种新的测量方法,扩展了现有的对偶感知模型(Kenny & Acitelli,2001),以调查夫妻(N=148)关于浪漫关系积极和消极维度的报告之间的关联。考察了参与者年龄和关系长度的差异,以检验发展假说,以及依恋和幸福感作为参与者浪漫认知的相关因素。伴侣之间的一致性较低,但个体对自己和伴侣的报告之间的相关性较高(投射)。与年轻人相比,老年人对消极浪漫行为的一致性更高,与较短关系相比,较长关系中对积极行为的一致性更高。消极行为的伴侣相似性高于积极行为的相似性。幸福感较好的个体报告了更多的积极浪漫行为,在某些情况下,依恋安全感也与之相关。男性对浪漫行为的评价比女性更消极,但在一致性或投射方面没有性别差异。

相似文献

1
Positive and negative romantic relationship quality: age, familiarity, attachment and well-being as correlates of couple agreement and projection.积极和消极的浪漫关系质量:年龄、熟悉程度、依恋和幸福感是夫妻一致性和投射的相关因素。
J Adolesc. 2010 Dec;33(6):879-90. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2010.07.008. Epub 2010 Sep 16.
2
Predictors of young adults' representations of and behavior in their current romantic relationship: prospective tests of the prototype hypothesis.年轻人当前浪漫关系中的表征与行为的预测因素:原型假设的前瞻性检验
Attach Hum Dev. 2005 Jun;7(2):105-21. doi: 10.1080/14616730500134928.
3
Young people's romantic attachment styles and their associations with well-being.年轻人的浪漫依恋风格及其与幸福感的关联。
J Adolesc. 2002 Apr;25(2):243-55. doi: 10.1006/jado.2002.0464.
4
Organization and predictive power of general and relationship-specific attachment models: one for all, and all for one?一般依恋模型和特定关系依恋模型的组织与预测能力:一适用于全体,全体适用于一?
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2005 Dec;31(12):1665-82. doi: 10.1177/0146167205278307.
5
Adult attachment security and young adults' dating relationships over time: self-reported, observational, and physiological evidence.成人依恋安全性与年轻人恋爱关系随时间的变化:自我报告、观察和生理证据。
Dev Psychol. 2010 Mar;46(2):552-7. doi: 10.1037/a0018542.
6
Which thoughts count? Algorithms for evaluating satisfaction in relationships.哪些想法重要?评估人际关系满意度的算法。
Psychol Sci. 2008 Oct;19(10):1030-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02195.x.
7
Conflicting pressures on romantic relationship commitment for anxiously attached individuals.焦虑依恋个体的浪漫关系承诺面临的冲突压力。
J Pers. 2011 Feb;79(1):51-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00680.x.
8
The coherence of dyadic behavior across parent-child and romantic relationships as mediated by the internalized representation of experience.由内化的经验表征所介导的亲子关系和浪漫关系中二元行为的连贯性。
Attach Hum Dev. 2001 Sep;3(2):156-72. doi: 10.1080/14616730126483.
9
Adolescent romantic relationships: a look from the future.青少年恋爱关系:从未来视角审视
J Adolesc. 2001 Jun;24(3):337-51. doi: 10.1006/jado.2001.0409.
10
Extending the actor-partner interdependence model to include cross-informant data.将 actor-partner 互依模型扩展到包括交叉报告者数据。
J Adolesc. 2010 Dec;33(6):869-77. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2010.07.002. Epub 2010 Aug 16.

引用本文的文献

1
What is a healthy dating relationship and what helps it get there? Perceptions of Chilean adolescents from a gender and inclusivity perspective.什么是健康的恋爱关系,以及如何促成这种关系?从性别和包容性角度看智利青少年的认知。
Front Psychol. 2025 Jul 24;16:1489208. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1489208. eCollection 2025.
2
Concordance in Reported Love, Trust, and Relationship Quality among Same-Sex Male Relationships.同性男性恋爱关系中所报告的爱意、信任及关系质量的一致性
J Relatsh Res. 2018;9. doi: 10.1017/jrr.2018.19. Epub 2019 Jan 15.
3
Well-Being and Romantic Relationships: A Systematic Review in Adolescence and Emerging Adulthood.
幸福感与浪漫关系:青少年和成年初期的系统综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jul 7;16(13):2415. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16132415.
4
Romantic relationship development: The interplay between age and relationship length.浪漫关系的发展:年龄与关系持续时间之间的相互作用。
Dev Psychol. 2017 Sep;53(9):1738-1749. doi: 10.1037/dev0000363. Epub 2017 Jun 12.
5
Adult Attachment and Transgender Identity in the Italian Context: Clinical Implications and Suggestions for Further Research.意大利背景下的成人依恋与跨性别身份认同:临床启示与进一步研究建议
Int J Transgend. 2015;16(1):49-61. doi: 10.1080/15532739.2015.1022680.
6
Predicting romantic involvement, relationship cognitions, and relationship qualities from physical appearance, perceived norms, and relational styles regarding friends and parents.从外貌、对朋友和父母的看法、关系风格来预测浪漫关系的参与、关系认知和关系质量。
J Adolesc. 2010 Dec;33(6):827-36. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2010.07.004. Epub 2010 Aug 30.