Steinmeyer R
Kreisverwaltung Mayen-Koblenz, Abteilung Gesundheit.
Gesundheitswesen. 2011 Aug;73(8-9):483-90. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1255076. Epub 2010 Sep 15.
Since the end of the first half of the 20 (th) century it is well-known that fluoride concentrations in drinking water of about 1 ppm reduce the prevalence of dental caries by about 40-60%. This knowledge led to the fluoridation of drinking water during the second half of the 20 (th) century in many countries, including East Germany. Although the natural F (-) content in drinking water in Germany is usually very low, the eastern Eifel is one of the few larger areas in Germany with (nearly) optimal (0.7-1.0 ppm) or moderately enhanced (0.3-0.7 ppm) natural fluoride concentrations in drinking water. 30 years ago, in 1977, the caries prevalence of children of various age groups in the fluoride-rich areas of the eastern Eifel was established by Einwag to be about 40% lower than in adjacent fluoride-poor regions (0.1 ppm). Meanwhile fluoride has become available from many different sources for children of any age: e. g., toothpaste (with 500 ppm fluoride even for very young children who just got the first tooth), fluoridated salt, professional fluoride applications (paid by health insurances), the rising consumption of mineral waters (many of which have a fluoride content >0.3 ppm). This poses the question of the current influence of enhanced natural drinking water fluoride concentrations on caries prevalence in children.
The results of the dental examinations of 9 555 pupils (6 or 7 years old) of the first classes of all 63 primary schools in the Landkreis Mayen-Koblenz from 5 years (2004/2005-2008/2009) are compared to the fluoride content of the drinking water. The data show no obvious correlation between dental health and fluoride concentration for any of the dental health parameters investigated. However, in spite of the low geographic resolution of social parameters, there was a notable connection between dental health status and sociodemographic indicators for the respective region.
30 years after the study by Einwag in the same region, the natural fluoride content of drinking water either had no influence on dental health at all, or this influence is so diminutive that it is exceeded by far by sociodemographic factors. Obviously there is much more fluoride available from other sources nowadays compared to 30 years ago. The results may also have implications for the administration of fluoride tablets and support the recommendations of the DGZMK (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Zahn-, Mund- und Kieferheilkunde) from the year 2000, restricting the administration of fluoride tablets to special situations following an individual anamnesis of fluoride uptake.
自20世纪上半叶末以来,众所周知,饮用水中氟化物浓度约为1ppm可使龋齿患病率降低约40 - 60%。这一认识导致20世纪下半叶许多国家(包括东德)对饮用水进行氟化处理。尽管德国饮用水中的天然氟离子含量通常很低,但东艾费尔地区是德国少数几个饮用水中天然氟化物浓度处于(接近)最佳水平(0.7 - 1.0ppm)或适度升高(0.3 - 0.7ppm)的较大区域之一。30年前,即1977年,艾因瓦格确定东艾费尔富含氟化物地区各年龄组儿童的龋齿患病率比相邻的低氟地区(0.1ppm)低约40%。与此同时,现在任何年龄段的儿童都有多种不同来源的氟化物:例如,牙膏(即使是刚长出第一颗牙的幼儿使用的牙膏含氟量也达500ppm)、加氟盐、专业的氟化物应用(由健康保险支付费用)、矿泉水消费量的增加(许多矿泉水的氟含量>0.3ppm)。这就引发了关于饮用水中天然氟化物浓度升高对儿童龋齿患病率当前影响的问题。
将美因 - 科布伦茨县63所小学所有一年级9555名6或7岁小学生(2004/2005 - 2008/2009年5年间)的牙齿检查结果与饮用水中的氟含量进行比较。数据显示,在所调查的任何牙齿健康参数方面,牙齿健康与氟浓度之间均无明显相关性。然而,尽管社会参数的地理分辨率较低,但各地区的牙齿健康状况与社会人口统计学指标之间存在显著联系。
在艾因瓦格于同一地区进行研究30年后,饮用水中的天然氟化物含量要么对牙齿健康根本没有影响,要么这种影响非常微小,以至于远远被社会人口统计学因素所超越。显然,与30年前相比,现在从其他来源获得的氟化物要多得多。这些结果可能也对氟化物片剂的管理有影响,并支持德国口腔颌面外科学会(DGZMK)2000年的建议,即仅在根据个体氟摄入病史确定的特殊情况下才使用氟化物片剂。