• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阿根廷卫生系统的司法能动主义:近期趋势。

Judicial activism in the Argentine health system: recent trends.

机构信息

Universidad de Buenos Aires, Washington College of Law, American University, Washington, DC, USA.

出版信息

Health Hum Rights. 2008;10(2):53-65.

PMID:20845859
Abstract

This article explores judicial activism in Argentina as it relates to health, as evidenced by courts' willingness to address health issues and to monitor public policies. It examines the strategic use of the courts to channel claims against the government or companies providing health care services both by organizations devoted to litigation in the public interest and by individuals. In addition, the article looks closely at conflicts that have been adjudicated in the courts and various court responses. Special focus is given to the possible effects of certain court decisions on the Argentine health system following its reform during the 1990s, which included transfer and decentralization of functions and services.

摘要

本文探讨了阿根廷的司法能动主义与健康之间的关系,具体表现为法院愿意解决健康问题并监督公共政策。本文考察了法院如何战略性地利用诉讼来针对政府或提供医疗服务的公司提出诉求,包括公益诉讼组织和个人。此外,本文还仔细研究了法院裁决的各种冲突和法院的不同回应。特别关注的是,在 20 世纪 90 年代阿根廷卫生系统改革之后,包括职能和服务的转移和分散,某些法院判决对阿根廷卫生系统可能产生的影响。

相似文献

1
Judicial activism in the Argentine health system: recent trends.阿根廷卫生系统的司法能动主义:近期趋势。
Health Hum Rights. 2008;10(2):53-65.
2
Litigation as a strategy to hold governments accountable for implementing the right to health.作为一种策略,诉讼可用于追究政府落实健康权的责任。
Health Hum Rights. 2008;10(2):21-36.
3
Beyond compassion: the central role of accountability in applying a human rights framework to health.超越同情:在将人权框架应用于卫生保健中问责制的核心作用。
Health Hum Rights. 2008;10(2):1-20.
4
Administrative "health courts" for medical injury claims: the federal constitutional issues.处理医疗伤害索赔的行政“健康法庭”:联邦宪法问题。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2008 Aug;33(4):761-98. doi: 10.1215/03616878-2008-015.
5
Access to health care and equal protection of the law: the need for a new heightened scrutiny.获得医疗保健与法律的平等保护:对新的严格审查的需求。
Am J Law Med. 1986;12(3-4):345-80.
6
Will we take suffering seriously? Reflections on what applying a human rights framework to health means and why we should care.我们会认真对待苦难吗?对将人权框架应用于卫生保健的意义以及我们为何应该关注这一问题的反思。
Health Hum Rights. 2008;10(1):45-63.
7
The right to health in the courts of Brazil: worsening health inequities?巴西法院的健康权:加剧的健康不平等?
Health Hum Rights. 2009;11(2):33-45.
8
Courts and health care rationing: the case of the Brazilian Federal Supreme Court.法院与医疗资源配置:巴西联邦最高法院案例
Health Econ Policy Law. 2013 Jan;8(1):75-93. doi: 10.1017/S1744133112000291. Epub 2012 Oct 8.
9
Rights and the reality of healthcare charging in the United Kingdom.英国医疗收费的权利与现实
Med Confl Surviv. 2007 Oct-Dec;23(4):297-304. doi: 10.1080/13623690701596775.
10
The courts, public health, and legal preparedness.法院、公共卫生与法律准备工作。
Am J Public Health. 2007 Apr;97 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S69-73. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2006.101881. Epub 2007 Apr 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Precision Medicine for Cancer and Health Equity in Latin America: Generating Understanding for Policy and Health System Shaping.拉丁美洲癌症精准医学与健康公平:增进对政策制定和卫生系统塑造的理解
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Aug 5;22(8):1220. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22081220.