Department of Neurology, University of Forlida Movement Disorders Center, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.
J Neurosurg. 2010 Dec;113(6):1224-9. doi: 10.3171/2010.8.JNS10312. Epub 2010 Sep 17.
In this paper, the authors' aim was to examine reasons underpinning decisions to undergo, or alternatively forgo, a second-sided deep brain stimulation (DBS) implantation in patients with Parkinson disease (PD).
Fifty-two patients with Parkinson disease (PD) were randomized to receive DBS to the subthalamic nucleus or globus pallidus internus (GPi) as part of the COMPARE trial. Forty-four patients had complete data sets. All patients were offered a choice at 6 months after unilateral implantation whether to receive a contralateral DBS implant. All patients had advanced PD. The mean patient age was 59.8 years (range 43-76 years), and the mean duration of disease was 12.2 years (range 5-21 years). The mean baseline Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS)-III motor score was 42.7. The main outcome measures used in this study were the UPDRS-III Motor Scale and the UPDRS-IV Dyskinesia Scale.
Twenty-one (48%) of the 44 patients in the cohort did not undergo bilateral implantation and have been successfully treated for an average of 3.5 years; of these, 14 (67%) had a GPi target. The most common reason for adding a second side was inadequacy to address motor symptoms. Patient satisfaction with motor outcomes after unilateral DBS implantation was the most common reason for not undergoing bilateral implantation. Those who chose a second DBS procedure had significantly higher baseline UPDRS-III motor and ipsilateral UPDRS-III scores, and a significantly lower asymmetrical index. The logistic regression analysis revealed that the odds of proceeding to bilateral DBS was 5.2 times higher for STN than for GPi DBS. For every 1% increase in asymmetry, the odds of bilateral DBS decreased [corrected] by 0.96.
Unilateral DBS is an effective treatment for a subset of patients with PD. Baseline asymmetry is an important factor in the effectiveness and decision-making process between unilateral and bilateral DBS. Patients with GPi DBS in this cohort were more likely to choose to remain with unilateral implantation.
本文旨在探讨帕金森病(PD)患者决定接受或放弃双侧脑深部电刺激(DBS)植入的原因。
52 例 PD 患者随机分为丘脑底核(STN)或苍白球内侧部(GPi)DBS 组,作为 COMPARE 试验的一部分。44 例患者具有完整的数据集。所有患者在单侧植入后 6 个月均有选择是否接受对侧 DBS 植入的机会。所有患者均患有晚期 PD。患者平均年龄为 59.8 岁(范围 43-76 岁),平均病程为 12.2 年(范围 5-21 年)。基线时 UPDRS-III 运动评分的平均值为 42.7。本研究主要的观察指标为 UPDRS-III 运动评分和 UPDRS-IV 运动障碍评分。
44 例患者中有 21 例(48%)未接受双侧植入,且成功治疗了 3.5 年;其中 14 例(67%)为 GPi 靶点。增加第二侧的最常见原因是无法解决运动症状。单侧 DBS 植入后患者对运动结果的满意度是不进行双侧植入的最常见原因。选择进行第二侧 DBS 手术的患者基线 UPDRS-III 运动评分和同侧 UPDRS-III 评分明显较高,不对称指数明显较低。逻辑回归分析显示,与 GPi DBS 相比,STN 进行双侧 DBS 的可能性高 5.2 倍。不对称程度每增加 1%,进行双侧 DBS 的可能性降低[更正]0.96。
单侧 DBS 是 PD 患者的一种有效治疗方法。基线不对称是单侧和双侧 DBS 有效性和决策过程中的一个重要因素。该队列中接受 GPi DBS 的患者更有可能选择单侧植入。