Suppr超能文献

目前可用于医疗保健的杀孢子剂及其局限性。

Currently available sporicides for use in healthcare, and their limitations.

机构信息

University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.

出版信息

J Hosp Infect. 2011 Mar;77(3):210-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2010.06.029. Epub 2010 Sep 17.

Abstract

Clostridium difficile has been recognised for some time as a pathogen which can contaminate the environment and which is associated with secondary spread via this route. Unfortunately many of the disinfectants currently used in healthcare environments are inactive against this organism. For example, alcohol-containing hand rubs do not have sporicidal activity and some quaternary ammonium compounds and detergents may even encourage sporulation. European standards have been developed to allow a standardised methodology for testing the efficacy of disinfectants, but no European standard exists for testing products against C. difficile in medical environments. Most laboratories use an adapted version of EN 13704 which was designed for food, domestic and industrial applications. It is important when testing a disinfectant that it is tested under dirty as well as clean conditions and that the disinfectant is adequately neutralised. Some of the currently available biocides have good activity against C. difficile although relatively long contact times are sometimes required and this may not accurately reflect in-use practises. Other agents have very little activity against C. difficile even after a contact time of 1h. It has to be recognised that testing activity against C. difficile is technically very challenging and therefore there can be large interlaboratory variations in results. When interpreting data, it is essential to scrutinise the methodology used in detail.

摘要

艰难梭菌(Clostridium difficile)已被证实是一种可以污染环境的病原体,并且可以通过这种途径引起二次传播。不幸的是,目前在医疗环境中使用的许多消毒剂对这种微生物无效。例如,含酒精的洗手液没有杀菌活性,而一些季铵化合物和清洁剂甚至可能促进孢子形成。已经制定了欧洲标准,允许使用标准化方法来测试消毒剂的功效,但针对医疗环境中艰难梭菌的产品测试没有欧洲标准。大多数实验室使用针对食品、家庭和工业应用设计的 EN 13704 的改编版本。在测试消毒剂时,重要的是要在脏污和清洁条件下进行测试,并确保消毒剂得到充分中和。虽然有些现有的杀生物剂对艰难梭菌有很好的活性,但有时需要较长的接触时间,这可能无法准确反映实际使用情况。其他试剂即使在 1 小时的接触时间后对艰难梭菌的活性也很小。必须认识到,针对艰难梭菌的测试活动在技术上具有很大的挑战性,因此结果在实验室之间可能存在很大差异。在解释数据时,务必详细审查所使用的方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验