Welsh School of Pharmacy, Cardiff University, United Kingdom.
Am J Infect Control. 2011 Apr;39(3):212-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2011.01.006.
Hospital-acquired infections associated with Clostridium difficile cause severe morbidity and mortality. The current control of C difficile endospores with liquid sporicides might have limited efficacy in the health care environment. Sporicidal wipes might offer additional control of surface bioburden and are now increasingly used, although there is little information about their efficacy against spores in practice.
Ten wipes were tested for sporicidal efficacy using a recently developed 3-stage protocol that measures the ability of the wipe to remove microbial bioburden from a surface, the potential for microbial transfer from the wipe to other surfaces, and the sporicidal activity of the wipe. Scanning electron microscopy was used to visualize the association of spores with the wipe fibers, and light scattering was used to measure the size of spore aggregates released from the wipes.
The ability of the sporicidal wipes to remove C difficile spores from an inanimate surface ranged from 0.22 to 4.09 log(10) spores removed within 10 seconds. One wipe did not remove any spores. None of the wipes demonstrated high sporicidal activity (ie, >4 log(10) reduction) within 5 minutes of contact time, except for a control wipe soaked in 5,000-ppm sodium hypochlorite. Only one wipe demonstrated some sporicidal activity after 5 minutes, with a 1.50 and a 3.74 log(10) reduction in spore number of C difficile NCTC12727 and R20291 (ribotype 027), respectively. All but one wipe demonstrated that spores could be repeatedly transferred to other surfaces. Light-scattering data provided evidence that some wipes were able to break up spore aggregates, potentially releasing more spores onto the surface. Electron microscopy micrographs showed that spores might be loosely associated with some wipes, explaining the rapid release.
Although the use of sporicidal wipes might offer additional control of microbial burden on surfaces, current efficacy tests might be inadequate to reflect the activity of these wipes in practice. This can lead to the use of wipes that might not be appropriate for applications in the health care environment. Tighter control of labeling and appropriate efficacy tests are needed before antimicrobial wipes are released to the market.
与艰难梭菌相关的医院获得性感染会导致严重的发病率和死亡率。目前,使用液体杀菌剂来控制艰难梭菌芽孢的方法在医疗环境中可能效果有限。杀菌湿巾可能会对表面生物负荷提供额外的控制,目前使用越来越多,尽管实际上关于它们对芽孢的杀菌效果的信息很少。
使用最近开发的 3 阶段方案测试了 10 种湿巾的杀菌功效,该方案测量了湿巾从表面去除微生物生物负荷的能力、湿巾将微生物转移到其他表面的潜力以及湿巾的杀菌活性。扫描电子显微镜用于观察孢子与湿巾纤维的结合,光散射用于测量从湿巾释放的孢子聚集体的大小。
杀菌湿巾从无生命表面去除艰难梭菌孢子的能力在 10 秒内从 0.22 到 4.09 对数(10)个孢子去除不等。有一个湿巾没有去除任何孢子。除了浸泡在 5000ppm 次氯酸钠中的对照湿巾外,没有任何湿巾在接触 5 分钟内表现出高杀菌活性(即>4 对数(10)减少)。只有一种湿巾在 5 分钟后表现出一些杀菌活性,艰难梭菌 NCTC12727 和 R20291(027 型)的孢子数分别减少了 1.50 和 3.74 对数(10)。除了一个湿巾外,所有湿巾都表明孢子可以反复转移到其他表面。光散射数据提供了证据表明一些湿巾能够破坏孢子聚集体,可能会将更多的孢子释放到表面上。电子显微镜照片显示,孢子可能与一些湿巾松散结合,这解释了快速释放。
尽管使用杀菌湿巾可能会对表面微生物负荷提供额外的控制,但目前的杀菌功效测试可能不足以反映这些湿巾在实际应用中的活性。这可能导致使用不适合医疗环境应用的湿巾。在抗菌湿巾投放市场之前,需要对标签进行更严格的控制,并进行适当的功效测试。