• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

错误增强对在狭窄平衡木上行走学习的影响。

The effects of error augmentation on learning to walk on a narrow balance beam.

机构信息

School of Kinesiology, University of Michigan, 3158 Observatory Lodge, 1402 Washtenaw Avenue, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2214, USA.

出版信息

Exp Brain Res. 2010 Oct;206(4):359-70. doi: 10.1007/s00221-010-2409-x. Epub 2010 Sep 19.

DOI:10.1007/s00221-010-2409-x
PMID:20853102
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11829330/
Abstract

Error augmentation during training has been proposed as a means to facilitate motor learning due to the human nervous system's reliance on performance errors to shape motor commands. We studied the effects of error augmentation on short-term learning of walking on a balance beam to determine whether it had beneficial effects on motor performance. Four groups of able-bodied subjects walked on a treadmill-mounted balance beam (2.5-cm wide) before and after 30 min of training. During training, two groups walked on the beam with a destabilization device that augmented error (Medium and High Destabilization groups). A third group walked on a narrower beam (1.27-cm) to augment error (Narrow). The fourth group practiced walking on the 2.5-cm balance beam (Wide). Subjects in the Wide group had significantly greater improvements after training than the error augmentation groups. The High Destabilization group had significantly less performance gains than the Narrow group in spite of similar failures per minute during training. In a follow-up experiment, a fifth group of subjects (Assisted) practiced with a device that greatly reduced catastrophic errors (i.e., stepping off the beam) but maintained similar pelvic movement variability. Performance gains were significantly greater in the Wide group than the Assisted group, indicating that catastrophic errors were important for short-term learning. We conclude that increasing errors during practice via destabilization and a narrower balance beam did not improve short-term learning of beam walking. In addition, the presence of qualitatively catastrophic errors seems to improve short-term learning of walking balance.

摘要

训练中的错误增强被提出作为一种促进运动学习的方法,因为人类神经系统依赖于性能错误来塑造运动指令。我们研究了在平衡木上行走的短期学习中错误增强的效果,以确定它对运动表现是否有有益的影响。四组健康受试者在跑步机上的平衡木(2.5 厘米宽)上进行了 30 分钟的训练前和训练后的行走。在训练过程中,两组人在带有错误增强装置的平衡木上行走(中高不稳定组)。第三组在更窄的平衡木(1.27 厘米)上行走以增加错误(窄组)。第四组在 2.5 厘米的平衡木上练习行走(宽组)。与错误增强组相比,宽组在训练后有显著更大的改善。尽管在训练过程中每分钟的失败次数相似,但高不稳定组的表现增益明显低于窄组。在后续实验中,第五组受试者(辅助组)使用一种大大减少灾难性错误(即,从平衡木上踏下)的装置进行练习,但保持类似的骨盆运动可变性。与辅助组相比,宽组的表现增益显著更大,表明灾难性错误对短期学习很重要。我们得出结论,通过不稳定和更窄的平衡木在练习中增加错误并没有改善平衡木行走的短期学习。此外,存在定性的灾难性错误似乎可以改善行走平衡的短期学习。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbc7/11829330/e0dbdcfe58c3/nihms-2055206-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbc7/11829330/a7bbfa62eb0f/nihms-2055206-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbc7/11829330/620f5a38ea96/nihms-2055206-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbc7/11829330/07399677ee21/nihms-2055206-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbc7/11829330/3d813d618a05/nihms-2055206-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbc7/11829330/e0dbdcfe58c3/nihms-2055206-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbc7/11829330/a7bbfa62eb0f/nihms-2055206-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbc7/11829330/620f5a38ea96/nihms-2055206-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbc7/11829330/07399677ee21/nihms-2055206-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbc7/11829330/3d813d618a05/nihms-2055206-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbc7/11829330/e0dbdcfe58c3/nihms-2055206-f0005.jpg

相似文献

1
The effects of error augmentation on learning to walk on a narrow balance beam.错误增强对在狭窄平衡木上行走学习的影响。
Exp Brain Res. 2010 Oct;206(4):359-70. doi: 10.1007/s00221-010-2409-x. Epub 2010 Sep 19.
2
Effects of physical guidance on short-term learning of walking on a narrow beam.身体引导对在窄梁上短期行走学习的影响。
Gait Posture. 2009 Nov;30(4):464-8. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.07.114. Epub 2009 Aug 12.
3
Practice walking on a treadmill-mounted balance beam modifies beam walking sacral movement and alters performance in other balance tasks.在跑步机平衡木上进行练习行走可以改变平衡木行走时的骶骨运动,并改变其他平衡任务的表现。
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 15;18(6):e0283310. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283310. eCollection 2023.
4
Visuomotor error augmentation affects mediolateral head and trunk stabilization during walking.视动误差增强会影响行走过程中头和躯干的横向稳定性。
Hum Mov Sci. 2019 Dec;68:102525. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2019.102525. Epub 2019 Nov 13.
5
Varied movement errors drive learning of dynamic balance control during walking in people with incomplete spinal cord injury: a pilot study.不同的运动误差驱动不完全性脊髓损伤患者行走时动态平衡控制的学习:一项初步研究。
Exp Brain Res. 2020 Apr;238(4):981-993. doi: 10.1007/s00221-020-05776-0. Epub 2020 Mar 18.
6
Performance of a visuomotor walking task in an augmented reality training setting.在增强现实训练环境中进行视觉运动步行任务的表现。
Hum Mov Sci. 2017 Dec;56(Pt B):11-19. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2017.10.005. Epub 2017 Oct 31.
7
Vision Is Not Required to Elicit Balance Improvements From Beam Walking Practice.无需视觉即可通过走平衡木练习改善平衡。
Motor Control. 2024 Aug 19;28(4):480-492. doi: 10.1123/mc.2023-0145. Print 2024 Oct 1.
8
Transient visual perturbations boost short-term balance learning in virtual reality by modulating electrocortical activity.短暂视觉扰动通过调节皮层电活动促进虚拟现实中的短期平衡学习。
J Neurophysiol. 2018 Oct 1;120(4):1998-2010. doi: 10.1152/jn.00292.2018. Epub 2018 Jul 25.
9
Error variability affects the after effects following motor learning of lateral balance control during walking in people with spinal cord injury.运动学习后平衡控制的误差变异性会影响脊髓损伤患者行走时的后效。
Eur J Neurosci. 2019 Oct;50(8):3221-3234. doi: 10.1111/ejn.14478. Epub 2019 Jun 20.
10
Voluntarily changing step length or step width affects dynamic stability of human walking.自愿改变步长或步宽会影响人体行走的动态稳定性。
Gait Posture. 2012 Mar;35(3):472-7. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.11.010. Epub 2011 Dec 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of mediolateral leg perturbations on walking balance in people with chronic stroke: A randomized controlled trial.经颅直流电刺激对慢性脑卒中患者平衡功能及步行能力的影响:一项随机对照试验
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 8;19(10):e0311727. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311727. eCollection 2024.
2
Vision Is Not Required to Elicit Balance Improvements From Beam Walking Practice.无需视觉即可通过走平衡木练习改善平衡。
Motor Control. 2024 Aug 19;28(4):480-492. doi: 10.1123/mc.2023-0145. Print 2024 Oct 1.
3
Practice walking on a treadmill-mounted balance beam modifies beam walking sacral movement and alters performance in other balance tasks.在跑步机平衡木上进行练习行走可以改变平衡木行走时的骶骨运动,并改变其他平衡任务的表现。
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 15;18(6):e0283310. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283310. eCollection 2023.
4
Human electrocortical, electromyographical, ocular, and kinematic data during perturbed walking and standing.人类在行走和站立受干扰时的脑电、肌电、眼动及运动学数据。
Data Brief. 2021 Nov 25;39:107635. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2021.107635. eCollection 2021 Dec.
5
Human-Human Hand Interactions Aid Balance During Walking by Haptic Communication.通过触觉交流,人与人手部的互动有助于行走时保持平衡。
Front Robot AI. 2021 Nov 4;8:735575. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2021.735575. eCollection 2021.
6
Effects of acute wearable resistance loading on overground running lower body kinematics.急性可穿戴阻力负荷对地面跑步下肢运动学的影响。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 28;15(12):e0244361. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244361. eCollection 2020.
7
Controller synthesis and clinical exploration of wearable gyroscopic actuators to support human balance.可穿戴陀螺仪致动器的控制器综合与临床探索,以支持人体平衡。
Sci Rep. 2020 Jun 26;10(1):10412. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-66760-w.
8
Rigid soles improve balance in beam walking, but improvements do not persist with bare feet.硬底鞋可改善平衡,但赤脚时改善效果不会持续。
Sci Rep. 2020 May 6;10(1):7629. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-64035-y.
9
Relearning functional and symmetric walking after stroke using a wearable device: a feasibility study.使用可穿戴设备重新学习中风后的功能性和对称性行走:一项可行性研究。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2019 Aug 28;16(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s12984-019-0569-x.
10
Group-level cortical and muscular connectivity during perturbations to walking and standing balance.群组水平皮质和肌肉连接在行走和站立平衡的扰动中。
Neuroimage. 2019 Sep;198:93-103. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.05.038. Epub 2019 May 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Size of error affects cerebellar contributions to motor learning.误差大小会影响小脑对运动学习的作用。
J Neurophysiol. 2010 Apr;103(4):2275-84. doi: 10.1152/jn.00822.2009. Epub 2010 Feb 17.
2
Effects of physical guidance on short-term learning of walking on a narrow beam.身体引导对在窄梁上短期行走学习的影响。
Gait Posture. 2009 Nov;30(4):464-8. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.07.114. Epub 2009 Aug 12.
3
Review of control strategies for robotic movement training after neurologic injury.神经损伤后机器人运动训练控制策略综述
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2009 Jun 16;6:20. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-6-20.
4
Robotic neurorehabilitation: a computational motor learning perspective.机器人神经康复:计算运动学习视角
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2009 Feb 25;6:5. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-6-5.
5
Multicenter randomized clinical trial evaluating the effectiveness of the Lokomat in subacute stroke.评估Lokomat在亚急性中风中有效性的多中心随机临床试验。
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009 Jan;23(1):5-13. doi: 10.1177/1545968308326632.
6
Can robots help the learning of skilled actions?机器人能帮助学习熟练动作吗?
Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2009 Jan;37(1):43-51. doi: 10.1097/JES.0b013e3181912108.
7
Relevance of error: what drives motor adaptation?误差的相关性:是什么驱动运动适应?
J Neurophysiol. 2009 Feb;101(2):655-64. doi: 10.1152/jn.90545.2008. Epub 2008 Nov 19.
8
Shared internal models for feedforward and feedback control.用于前馈和反馈控制的共享内部模型。
J Neurosci. 2008 Oct 15;28(42):10663-73. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5479-07.2008.
9
Reduced postural sway during quiet standing by light touch is due to finger tactile feedback but not mechanical support.轻触时安静站立时姿势摆动减少是由于手指触觉反馈而非机械支撑。
Exp Brain Res. 2008 Jun;188(1):153-8. doi: 10.1007/s00221-008-1426-5. Epub 2008 May 28.
10
The effects of age on medio-lateral stability during normal and narrow base walking.年龄对正常行走和窄基底行走时的内外侧稳定性的影响。
Gait Posture. 2008 Oct;28(3):466-71. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2008.02.009. Epub 2008 Apr 8.