Cordier Reinie, Bundy Anita, Hocking Clare, Einfeld Stewart
Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Aust Occup Ther J. 2010 Apr;57(2):137-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1630.2009.00821.x.
Studies have found differences in the nature and severity of social problems experienced by children with different subtypes of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Given that play is often the context for acquiring social skills, there is surprisingly limited research examining whether these differences distinguish the play of children within the groups.
Using the Test of Playfulness (ToP), we examined the similarities and differences in play between children (aged 5-11 years) diagnosed with the three DSM-IV ADHD subtypes: inattentive (I-subtype; n=46), hyperactive-impulsive (HI-subtype; n=28) and combined subtypes (C-subtype; n=31).
Bias interaction, an item-by-item analysis, revealed that the hierarchy of ToP items was similar for children with the HI- and C-subtypes, but differed for children with the I-subtype. Specifically, children with the I-subtype found it more difficult to become intensely engaged in play and to take on playful mischief and clowning; however, they found social play items to be easier. Conversely, whereas mischief and clowning were relatively easier for children with the HI- and C-subtypes, many items reflecting social interaction were more difficult. These findings suggest that interventions can be tailored to these differing presentations. However, further research is needed to confirm the findings.
研究发现,患有不同亚型注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的儿童所经历的社会问题在性质和严重程度上存在差异。鉴于玩耍往往是获得社交技能的情境,令人惊讶的是,研究这些差异是否能区分不同组内儿童玩耍情况的研究非常有限。
我们使用玩耍性测试(ToP),研究了被诊断为DSM-IV中三种ADHD亚型的5至11岁儿童在玩耍方面的异同:注意力不集中型(I型;n = 46)、多动冲动型(HI型;n = 28)和混合型(C型;n = 31)。
偏差交互分析(逐项分析)显示,ToP项目的层次结构在HI型和C型儿童中相似,但在I型儿童中有所不同。具体而言,I型儿童发现更难全身心投入玩耍以及进行调皮捣蛋和扮小丑的行为;然而,他们觉得社交玩耍项目更容易。相反,对于HI型和C型儿童来说,调皮捣蛋和扮小丑相对更容易,而许多反映社交互动的项目则更难。这些发现表明,可以针对这些不同的表现形式制定干预措施。然而,需要进一步的研究来证实这些发现。