Department of Human Resources, Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby, Aarhus, Denmark.
BMC Med Educ. 2010 Sep 21;10:62. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-10-62.
The educational climate is crucial in postgraduate medical education. Although leaders are in the position to influence the educational climate, the relationship between leadership skills and educational climate is unknown. This study investigates the relationship between the educational climate in clinical departments and the leadership skills of clinical consultants responsible for education.
The study was a trans-sectional correlation study. The educational climate was investigated by a survey among all doctors (specialists and trainees) in the departments. Leadership skills of the consultants responsible for education were measured by multi-source feedback scores from heads of departments, peer consultants, and trainees.
Doctors from 42 clinical departments representing 21 specialties participated. The response rate of the educational climate investigation was moderate 52% (420/811), Response rate was high in the multisource-feedback process 84.3% (420/498). The educational climate was scored quite high mean 3.9 (SD 0.3) on a five-point Likert scale. Likewise the leadership skills of the clinical consultants responsible for education were considered good, mean 5.4 (SD 0.6) on a seven-point Likert scale. There was no significant correlation between the scores concerning the educational climate and the scores on leadership skills, r = 0.17 (p = 0.29).
This study found no relation between the educational climate and the leadership skills of the clinical consultants responsible for postgraduate medical education in clinical departments with the instruments used. Our results indicate that consultants responsible for education are in a weak position to influence the educational climate in the clinical department. Further studies are needed to explore, how heads of departments and other factors related to the clinical organisation could influence the educational climate.
教育氛围对研究生医学教育至关重要。尽管领导者处于影响教育氛围的地位,但领导技能与教育氛围之间的关系尚不清楚。本研究调查了临床科室的教育氛围与负责教育的临床顾问的领导技能之间的关系。
该研究是一项横断面相关性研究。通过对科室所有医生(专家和受训者)进行调查来研究教育氛围。负责教育的顾问的领导技能通过部门负责人、同行顾问和受训者的多源反馈评分来衡量。
来自 21 个专业的 42 个临床科室的医生参与了研究。教育氛围调查的回复率为中等水平 52%(420/811),多源反馈过程的回复率很高为 84.3%(420/498)。教育氛围在五分制量表上的平均得分为 3.9(SD 0.3)。同样,负责研究生医学教育的临床顾问的领导技能也被认为很好,在七分制量表上的平均得分为 5.4(SD 0.6)。教育氛围得分与领导技能得分之间无显著相关性,r = 0.17(p = 0.29)。
本研究使用的工具发现,临床科室的教育氛围与负责研究生医学教育的临床顾问的领导技能之间没有关系。我们的结果表明,负责教育的顾问在影响临床科室的教育氛围方面处于弱势地位。需要进一步的研究来探索部门负责人和与临床组织相关的其他因素如何影响教育氛围。