Suppr超能文献

用于测量烧伤瘢痕挛缩的方法和工具。

Methods and tools used for the measurement of burn scar contracture.

作者信息

Parry Ingrid, Walker Kimberly, Niszczak Jonathan, Palmieri Tina, Greenhalgh David

机构信息

Department of Occupational and Physical Therapy, Shriners Hospital for Children, Northern California, Sacramento, California 95817, USA.

出版信息

J Burn Care Res. 2010 Nov-Dec;31(6):888-903. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e3181f9354f.

Abstract

After burn injury, scar contracture can cause significant impairment and functional deficit. Many studies have investigated the treatment and prevention of burn scar contracture, but few studies have focused on the methods for measuring contracture. The purpose of this study was to determine whether consistent and objective methods of measurement are used to quantify scar contracture in the clinical evaluation of burn patients and in burn research. A survey was administered to 407 burn therapists to determine the methods and tools used clinically to measure scar contracture, while a review of recent burn literature was conducted to determine the methods and tools used in burn research. The results of the survey indicate that there is a lack of consensus in the methods and tools used for the measurement of scar contracture, both clinically and in research. Instead, a variety of measurement methods was reported, each with varying degrees of objectivity. Clinically, the methods are rarely checked for reliability or performance competency. In burn research, the methods and tools vary, and contracture data obtained are often reported in an inconsistent manner. If the measurement of scar contracture is not done objectively and consistently, then it is difficult to determine reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the measurement methods. Development of standard protocols with reliable measures of scar contracture would improve the quality of burn care and research.

摘要

烧伤后,瘢痕挛缩可导致严重的功能障碍和功能缺陷。许多研究探讨了烧伤瘢痕挛缩的治疗和预防,但很少有研究关注瘢痕挛缩的测量方法。本研究的目的是确定在烧伤患者的临床评估和烧伤研究中,是否使用了一致且客观的测量方法来量化瘢痕挛缩。对407名烧伤治疗师进行了一项调查,以确定临床上用于测量瘢痕挛缩的方法和工具,同时对近期的烧伤文献进行了回顾,以确定烧伤研究中使用的方法和工具。调查结果表明,在临床上和研究中,用于测量瘢痕挛缩的方法和工具缺乏一致性。相反,报告了多种测量方法,每种方法的客观性程度各不相同。在临床上,很少对这些方法进行可靠性或性能能力检查。在烧伤研究中,方法和工具各不相同,所获得的挛缩数据报告方式往往不一致。如果瘢痕挛缩的测量不客观、不一致,那么就很难确定测量方法的可靠性、有效性和反应性。制定具有可靠瘢痕挛缩测量方法的标准方案将提高烧伤护理和研究的质量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验