Everett Janine S, Budescu Mia, Sommers Marilyn S
University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, PA, USA.
Clin Nurs Res. 2012 Nov;21(4):495-516. doi: 10.1177/1054773812446510. Epub 2012 May 28.
The background of this article is that assessment and quantification of skin color is important to health care; color is one indicator of overall health and is linked to oxygenation, tissue perfusion, nutritional status, and injury. The purpose is to describe how skin color varies across racial/ethnic groups so that the information can be applied to clinical practice. The method used is cross-sectional, descriptive design (n = 257). We recorded self-defined race/ethnicity and used a spectrophotometer to measure skin color at two anatomic sites. Skin color variables included L* (light/dark), a* (red/green), and b* (yellow/blue). As regards results, we found significant differences in L*, a*, and b* values by site and race/ethnicity in White, Asian, and Biracial participants. L*: F(3, 233) = 139.04, p < .01 and F(3, 233) = 118.47, p < .01. Black participants had significantly lower mean L* values and wider ranges of L*, a*, and b* as compared with other groups. In regard to application, these findings suggest that clinicians and researchers should plan and provide care based on skin color, rather than race/ethnicity.
本文的背景是,皮肤颜色的评估和量化对医疗保健很重要;颜色是整体健康的一个指标,与氧合、组织灌注、营养状况和损伤有关。目的是描述皮肤颜色在不同种族/族裔群体中的差异,以便将这些信息应用于临床实践。所采用的方法是横断面描述性设计(n = 257)。我们记录了自行定义的种族/族裔,并使用分光光度计在两个解剖部位测量皮肤颜色。皮肤颜色变量包括L*(亮/暗)、a*(红/绿)和b*(黄/蓝)。关于结果,我们发现白种人、亚洲人和混血参与者在L*、a和b值上,按部位和种族/族裔存在显著差异。L*:F(3, 233) = 139.04,p < .01以及F(3, 233) = 118.47,p < .01。与其他群体相比,黑人参与者的平均L值显著更低,且L、a和b的范围更广。关于应用,这些发现表明临床医生和研究人员应根据皮肤颜色而非种族/族裔来规划和提供护理。