Suppr超能文献

用于评估注射用制剂注射时疼痛和肌肉损伤的大鼠舔爪/肌肉刺激模型。

Rat paw-lick/muscle irritation model for evaluating parenteral formulations for pain-on-injection and muscle damage.

作者信息

Chellman G J, Faurot G F, Lollini L O, McCullough T E

机构信息

Department of Toxicology, Syntex, Inc., Palo Alto, California 94303.

出版信息

Fundam Appl Toxicol. 1990 Nov;15(4):697-709. doi: 10.1016/0272-0590(90)90186-n.

Abstract

A two-phase assay was developed in the rat to evaluate parenteral formulations intended for intramuscular administration for the induction of both acute pain-on-injection and delayed pain/discomfort at the injection site (secondary to muscle damage). Phase 1 of the assay assessed pain-on-injection using a modified version of the previously published rat paw-lick assay. Adult male CD rats (10/group) were given subplantar (footpad) injections of 0.1 ml and then observed for 15 min for paw-lick responses. To increase assay sensitivity, responses more subtle than paw licks (ie., paw lifts) were scored, and injection-site clinical signs were recorded 6, 24, and 48 hr after injection. Phase 2 of the assay assessed myotoxic potential, using the same rats after a 1-week recovery period. The rats were injected intramuscularly in the anterior thigh with 0.2 ml, bled from the orbital sinus at 2, 6, and 24 hr for analysis of serum creatine kinase (CK), and then necropsied at 24 hr to prepare tissue sections of the injection site for microscopic examination. A series of cephalosporin-type antibiotics produced pain-on-injection and muscle damage consistent with reported clinical experience (cefazolin less than cephalothin less than cefoxitin). Several nonantibiotic parenteral formulations (diazepam, digoxin, phenytoin, and lidocaine) tested in the paw-lick/muscle irritation model also produced responses that correlated with the clinic, i.e., virtually no acute pain but moderate to marked muscle damage. The results indicate that the two-phase rat paw-lick/muscle irritation model is effective in evaluating parenteral formulations for clinical acceptability, and that both phases of the assay are necessary to optimize predictability of the assay for human clinical experience.

摘要

我们开发了一种大鼠两阶段试验,以评估旨在肌肉注射的肠胃外制剂,该制剂会引发注射时的急性疼痛以及注射部位的延迟疼痛/不适(继发于肌肉损伤)。试验的第一阶段使用先前发表的大鼠舔爪试验的改良版本来评估注射时的疼痛。成年雄性CD大鼠(每组10只)足底(脚垫)注射0.1 ml,然后观察15分钟的舔爪反应。为提高试验灵敏度,对比舔爪更细微的反应(即抬爪)进行评分,并在注射后6、24和48小时记录注射部位的临床体征。试验的第二阶段在1周恢复期后使用相同的大鼠评估肌毒性潜力。大鼠在大腿前部肌肉注射0.2 ml,在2、6和24小时从眶窦取血分析血清肌酸激酶(CK),然后在24小时进行尸检,制备注射部位的组织切片进行显微镜检查。一系列头孢菌素类抗生素产生的注射时疼痛和肌肉损伤与报告的临床经验一致(头孢唑林<头孢噻吩<头孢西丁)。在舔爪/肌肉刺激模型中测试的几种非抗生素肠胃外制剂(地西泮、地高辛、苯妥英和利多卡因)也产生了与临床相关的反应,即几乎没有急性疼痛,但有中度至明显的肌肉损伤。结果表明,大鼠两阶段舔爪/肌肉刺激模型可有效评估肠胃外制剂的临床可接受性,并且试验的两个阶段对于优化试验对人类临床经验的可预测性都是必要的。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验