• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项关于法医精神卫生领域服务使用者职业经历的定性研究。

A qualitative study of service user experiences of occupation in forensic mental health.

作者信息

Craik Christine, Bryant Wendy, Ryan Amanda, Barclay Samantha, Brooke Nicole, Mason Adele, Russell Peter

机构信息

School of Health Sciences and Social Care, Brunel University, West London, UK.

出版信息

Aust Occup Ther J. 2010 Oct;57(5):339-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1630.2010.00857.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1440-1630.2010.00857.x
PMID:20868423
Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM: This qualitative study explored occupational engagement of those detained in forensic units. Legal and institutional restrictions on occupation have implications for their health and wellbeing.

METHOD

Twenty-six current forensic mental health service users participated in five focus groups, which were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and subjected to constant comparative analysis.

FINDINGS

The participants highlighted previous occupations, current occupations and hopes. Key aspects were control over decision-making, motivation and support, generating suggestions alongside positive experiences of occupational therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Institutional barriers could be overcome with a dynamic balance between risk management and mental health promotion through occupation. This demands a sustained focus on occupation for everyone involved in providing care and treatment in these settings.

摘要

背景/目的:本定性研究探讨了被拘留在法医单位人员的职业参与情况。职业方面的法律和制度限制对他们的健康和福祉有影响。

方法

26名目前正在接受法医心理健康服务的使用者参加了5个焦点小组,对讨论进行了录音、逐字转录,并进行了持续比较分析。

结果

参与者强调了以前的职业、当前的职业和期望。关键方面包括对决策的控制、动力和支持,同时还提出了职业治疗的积极经验和建议。

结论

通过职业活动在风险管理和促进心理健康之间实现动态平衡,可以克服制度障碍。这要求持续关注参与这些场所护理和治疗工作的每一个人的职业情况。

相似文献

1
A qualitative study of service user experiences of occupation in forensic mental health.一项关于法医精神卫生领域服务使用者职业经历的定性研究。
Aust Occup Ther J. 2010 Oct;57(5):339-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1630.2010.00857.x.
2
Mental health care in prisons and the issue of forensic hospitals in Italy.意大利监狱中的心理健康护理与法医医院问题。
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2014 Jun;202(6):473-8. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0000000000000147.
3
Transformations of self and sexuality: psychologically modified experiences in the context of forensic mental health.自我和性取向的转变:法医学心理健康背景下的心理修饰体验。
Health (London). 2014 May;18(3):240-60. doi: 10.1177/1363459313497606. Epub 2013 Aug 28.
4
The indistinguishables: determining appropriate environments for justice involved individuals.难以区分者:为涉案人员确定适当的环境
CNS Spectr. 2020 Apr;25(2):122-127. doi: 10.1017/S1092852919001391. Epub 2019 Oct 10.
5
Legal issues in maximum security institutions for people with mental illness: liberty, security, and administrative discretion.为患有精神疾病者设立的高度戒备机构中的法律问题:自由、安全与行政自由裁量权。
Behav Sci Law. 2002;20(5):463-80. doi: 10.1002/bsl.505.
6
Rehabilitation between institutional and non-institutional forensic psychiatric care: important influences on the transition process.机构和非机构法医精神病学护理之间的康复:对过渡过程的重要影响。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2012 Oct;19(8):729-37. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2850.2011.01852.x. Epub 2011 Dec 19.
7
Methodological development of the Hoeven Outcome Monitor (HOM): A first step towards a more evidence based medicine in forensic mental health.霍芬结果监测器(HOM)的方法学发展:迈向法医精神卫生领域更具循证性医学的第一步。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2016 Mar-Apr;45:43-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2016.02.009. Epub 2016 Feb 24.
8
How family members of mentally ill offenders experience the internment measure and (forensic) psychiatric treatment in Belgium: A qualitative study.比利时精神病罪犯的家庭成员如何体验拘留措施及(法医)精神病治疗:一项定性研究。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2017 Sep-Oct;54:76-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2017.05.003. Epub 2017 May 18.
9
Patient experiences of autonomy and coercion while receiving legal leverage in forensic assertive community treatment.在法医积极社区治疗中获得法律支持时患者的自主和强制体验。
Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2014 Jul-Aug;22(4):222-30. doi: 10.1097/01.HRP.0000450448.48563.c1.
10
A new standard of care for forensic mental health treatment: prioritizing forensic intervention.
CNS Spectr. 2015 Jun;20(3):172-6. doi: 10.1017/S1092852915000140. Epub 2015 Apr 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Reliability and validity of the German version of the Forensic Restrictiveness Questionnaire.德文版《法医限制问卷》的信度与效度
Front Psychiatry. 2025 May 20;16:1566694. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1566694. eCollection 2025.
2
Respect for bioethical principles and human rights in prisons: a systematic review on the state of the art.尊重监狱中的生物伦理原则和人权:现状的系统评价。
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 May 22;25(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01049-5.
3
Patient and Public Involvement in Occupational Therapy Health Research: A Scoping Review.
患者和公众参与职业治疗健康研究:范围综述。
OTJR (Thorofare N J). 2023 Jan;43(1):119-126. doi: 10.1177/15394492221096058. Epub 2022 May 13.
4
Exploring Needs and Quality of Life of Forensic Psychiatric Inpatients in the Reformed Italian System, Implications for Care and Safety.探索意大利改革后系统中法医精神病住院患者的需求和生活质量,对护理与安全的启示
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Apr 3;11:258. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00258. eCollection 2020.
5
Transitional housing in forensic mental health: considering consumer lived experience.法医精神卫生领域的过渡性住房:考量消费者的生活经历
Health Justice. 2019 May 20;7(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s40352-019-0091-z.
6
Improving ward environments and developing skills for discharge with the implementation of self-catering on a low secure forensic unit.
BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2016 Dec 30;5(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjquality.u210929.w4509. eCollection 2016.
7
Exploring stories of occupational engagement in a regional secure unit.探索地区安全病房中职业参与的故事。
J Forens Psychiatry Psychol. 2016 Sep 2;27(5):684-697. doi: 10.1080/14789949.2016.1187759. Epub 2016 May 30.