National Centre for Social Research (NatCen), 35 Northampton Square, London, UK.
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010 Sep 27;10:84. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-10-84.
Health-related data at local level could be provided by supplementing national health surveys with local boosts. Self-completion surveys are less costly than interviews, enabling larger samples to be achieved for a given cost. However, even when the same questions are asked with the same wording, responses to survey questions may vary by mode of data collection. These measurement differences need to be investigated further.
The Health Survey for England in London ('Core') and a London Boost survey ('Boost') used identical sampling strategies but different modes of data collection. Some data were collected by face-to-face interview in the Core and by self-completion in the Boost; other data were collected by self-completion questionnaire in both, but the context differed. Results were compared by mode of data collection using two approaches. The first examined differences in results that remained after adjusting the samples for differences in response. The second compared results after using propensity score matching to reduce any differences in sample composition.
There were no significant differences between the two samples for prevalence of some variables including long-term illness, limiting long-term illness, current rates of smoking, whether participants drank alcohol, and how often they usually drank. However, there were a number of differences, some quite large, between some key measures including: general health, GHQ12 score, portions of fruit and vegetables consumed, levels of physical activity, and, to a lesser extent, smoking consumption, the number of alcohol units reported consumed on the heaviest day of drinking in the last week and perceived social support (among women only).
Survey mode and context can both affect the responses given. The effect is largest for complex question modules but was also seen for identical self-completion questions. Some data collected by interview and self-completion can be safely combined.
通过在国家卫生调查中补充地方性数据,可以获得与健康相关的数据。自填式调查比访谈成本低,能够在给定成本下实现更大的样本量。然而,即使使用相同的措辞提出相同的问题,调查问题的回答也可能因数据收集方式的不同而有所差异。这些测量差异需要进一步研究。
英格兰伦敦健康调查(“核心”)和伦敦助推调查(“助推”)使用了相同的抽样策略,但数据收集方式不同。核心部分的数据是通过面对面访谈收集的,而助推部分的数据是通过自填问卷收集的;其他数据则通过自填问卷在两个调查中收集,但背景不同。通过两种方法按数据收集方式比较结果。第一种方法是在调整样本对响应差异后,检查结果的差异。第二种方法是使用倾向评分匹配来减少样本构成的差异,然后比较结果。
在一些变量的流行率方面,两种样本之间没有显著差异,包括长期疾病、限制长期疾病、当前吸烟率、参与者是否饮酒以及通常饮酒的频率。然而,在一些关键指标上存在一些差异,有些差异相当大,包括:一般健康状况、GHQ12 得分、摄入的水果和蔬菜量、身体活动水平,以及在较小程度上的吸烟量、上周饮酒最多的一天报告的饮酒量以及感知社会支持(仅女性)。
调查方式和背景都会影响受访者的回答。对于复杂的问题模块,影响最大,但对于相同的自填式问题也存在影响。一些通过访谈和自填收集的数据可以安全地结合在一起。