Department of Psychiatry, Foothills Hospital, 1403 29th St NW, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
J Clin Psychiatry. 2011 Jan;72(1):75-80. doi: 10.4088/JCP.09m05258gre. Epub 2010 Sep 21.
According to the American Psychiatric Association Clinical Practice Guidelines for schizophrenia, second-generation antipsychotics may be specifically indicated for the treatment of depression in schizophrenia. We examined the impact of these medications on symptoms of depression using the data from the Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE), conducted between January 2001 and December 2004.
Patients with DSM-IV-defined schizophrenia (N = 1,460) were assigned to treatment with a first-generation antipsychotic (perphenazine) or one of 4 second-generation drugs (olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, or ziprasidone) and followed for up to 18 months (phase 1). Patients with tardive dyskinesia were excluded from the randomization that included perphenazine. Depression was assessed with the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS). Mixed models were used to evaluate group differences during treatment with the initially assigned drug. An interaction analysis evaluated differences in drug response by whether patients had a baseline score on the CDSS of ≥ 6, indicative of a current major depressive episode (MDE).
There were no significant differences between treatment groups on phase 1 analysis, although there was a significant improvement in depression across all treatments. A significant interaction was found between treatment and experiencing an MDE at baseline (P = .05), and further paired comparisons suggested that quetiapine was superior to risperidone among patients who were in an MDE at baseline (P = .0056).
We found no differences between any second-generation antipsychotic and the first-generation antipsychotic perphenazine and no support for the clinical practice recommendation, but we did detect a signal indicating a small potential difference favoring quetiapine over risperidone only in patients with an MDE at baseline.
根据美国精神病学协会精神分裂症临床实践指南,第二代抗精神病药可能特别适用于精神分裂症患者的抑郁治疗。我们使用 2001 年 1 月至 2004 年 12 月进行的临床抗精神病药物干预效果试验(CATIE)的数据,研究了这些药物对抑郁症状的影响。
符合 DSM-IV 定义的精神分裂症患者(N=1460)被分配接受第一代抗精神病药(哌泊噻嗪)或四种第二代药物(奥氮平、喹硫平、利培酮或齐拉西酮)治疗,随访时间长达 18 个月(第 1 阶段)。伴有迟发性运动障碍的患者被排除在包括哌泊噻嗪的随机分组之外。使用 Calgary 精神分裂症抑郁量表(CDSS)评估抑郁情况。使用混合模型评估在最初分配药物治疗期间的组间差异。通过分析基线 CDSS 评分≥6 分(表明当前有重度抑郁发作[MDE])的患者,评估药物反应的差异。
在第 1 阶段分析中,治疗组之间没有显著差异,尽管所有治疗都显著改善了抑郁。治疗与基线时患有 MDE 之间存在显著的交互作用(P=0.05),进一步的配对比较表明,在基线时患有 MDE 的患者中,喹硫平优于利培酮(P=0.0056)。
我们没有发现任何第二代抗精神病药与第一代抗精神病药哌泊噻嗪之间的差异,也不支持临床实践推荐,但我们确实发现了一个信号,表明在基线时患有 MDE 的患者中,喹硫平可能比利培酮略有优势。