Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Ophthalmology. 2011 Feb;118(2):376-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.06.033.
To evaluate the chromatic pupillary response as a means of assessing outer and inner retinal function in patients with retinitis pigmentosa (RP).
Evaluation of diagnostic technology.
Thirty-two patients with RP and visual loss and 43 normal subjects.
Patients were tested with a chromatic pupillometer using red and blue lights (1, 10, and 100 cd/m(2)), and their pupil responses were compared with those from 43 normal subjects (reported previously). Visual field and electroretinography (ERG) results were examined and compared with the pupil responses.
The percent pupil contraction of the transient response to a low-intensity (1 cd/m(2)) blue light and high-intensity (100 cd/m(2)) red light and the sustained response to a high-intensity blue light was calculated for 1 eye of each subject.
The pupil responses to red and blue light at all intensities were recordable in all patients except 1, whose pupil responded only to bright blue light. There was a significant difference of the pupil response between patients with RP and normal subjects in testing conditions that emphasized rod (1 cd/m(2) blue light) or cone (100 cd/m(2) red light) contribution (P<0.001). Patients with a non-recordable scotopic ERG showed significantly reduced pupil responses (P<0.001) to low-intensity blue light (1 cd/m(2)). Patients with a non-recordable or abnormal photopic ERG showed significantly reduced pupil responses (P<0.05) to high-intensity red light (100 cd/m(2)). Patients with a nonrecordable ERG had the most visual field loss and reduced pupil responses. Unexpectedly, patients with RP showed a slower re-dilation of the pupil after termination of bright blue light compared with red light, a pattern not observed in normal subjects.
Pupil responses to red and blue light stimuli weighted to favor cone or rod input are significantly reduced in patients with RP but are still recordable in patients having a non-recordable ERG. In addition, outer photoreceptor disease appears to unmask a post-illumination pupillary constriction to bright blue light, most likely mediated by intrinsic activation of melanopsin ganglion cells. Chromatic pupillometry provides a novel, noninvasive method for following retinal functional status, particularly in patients with severe RP and non-recordable ERG.
评估色觉瞳孔反应作为一种评估色素性视网膜炎(RP)患者外和内视网膜功能的手段。
诊断技术评估。
32 名有视觉丧失的 RP 患者和 43 名正常受试者。
使用红色和蓝色光(1、10 和 100 cd/m(2))对患者进行色觉瞳孔计测试,并将他们的瞳孔反应与之前报道的 43 名正常受试者的瞳孔反应进行比较。检查视野和视网膜电图(ERG)结果,并与瞳孔反应进行比较。
计算每个受试者 1 只眼对低强度(1 cd/m(2))蓝色光和高强度(100 cd/m(2))红光的瞬态反应以及高强度蓝色光的持续反应的瞳孔收缩百分比。
除 1 名患者只能对亮蓝色光产生反应外,所有患者均能记录到红色和蓝色光在所有强度下的瞳孔反应。在强调视杆(1 cd/m(2) 蓝光)或视锥(100 cd/m(2) 红光)贡献的测试条件下,RP 患者与正常受试者的瞳孔反应有显著差异(P<0.001)。非记录性暗视 ERG 的患者对低强度蓝光(1 cd/m(2))的瞳孔反应明显降低(P<0.001)。非记录性或异常明视 ERG 的患者对高强度红光(100 cd/m(2))的瞳孔反应明显降低(P<0.05)。无 ERG 记录的患者视野丧失最严重,瞳孔反应也最差。出乎意料的是,与正常受试者不同,RP 患者在明亮蓝光终止后瞳孔的再扩张速度较慢,这种模式在正常受试者中未观察到。
RP 患者对红色和蓝色光刺激的瞳孔反应明显降低,但在无 ERG 记录的患者中仍可记录。此外,外光感受器疾病似乎会使明亮蓝光的瞳孔后收缩暴露出来,这很可能是由内在激活的黑色素节细胞介导的。色觉瞳孔测量法提供了一种新颖的、非侵入性的方法来跟踪视网膜功能状态,特别是在严重 RP 和无 ERG 记录的患者中。