Richter Paul, Wilhelm Helmut, Peters Tobias, Luedtke Holger, Kurtenbach Anne, Jaegle Herbert, Wilhelm Barbara
Pupil Research Group, Centre for Ophthalmology, University Eye Hospital, Elfriede-Aulhorn-Strasse 7, D-72076, Tuebingen, Germany.
Clinic for Ophthalmology, University Hospital Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauss-Allee 11, 93053, Regensburg, Germany.
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2017 Mar;255(3):519-527. doi: 10.1007/s00417-016-3496-6. Epub 2016 Oct 26.
To compare the chromatic pupillary light responses (PLR) in healthy subjects with those from patients with diseases of the outer or inner retina under various stimulus conditions, and to ascertain the parameters required to optimally distinguish between disease and control groups.
Fifteen patients with retinitis pigmentosa (RP), 19 patients with optic nerve disease (ON), and 16 healthy subjects were enrolled in this prospective study. ON included optic neuritis (NNO) and non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION). For each subject, the PLR was recorded, to red, yellow, green, and blue stimuli for durations of 4 and 12 s, and for stimulus intensities of 4 lx and 28 lx.
Comparison between control and RP or ON patient results showed that responses after stimulus onset were significantly different for most stimulus conditions, but the post-stimulus amplitudes at 3 s and 7 s after light extinction were not. On the other hand, the difference between the ON and RP groups was significant only for post-stimuli time-points and only for blue stimuli. Differences between responses to blue and red were significantly different, predominantly at post stimulus time-points. A ROC analysis revealed that the maximal constriction amplitudes to a 4 lx, 4 s yellow stimulus are significantly different in ON vs RP patients, and the responses to a 4 s, 28 lx blue stimulus at 7 s post-stimulus are significantly different in controls vs ON vs RP patients with a high specificity.
Pupillary light responses to blue light in healthy, RP, and ON subjects are significantly different from one another. The optimal stimuli for future protocols was found to be a 4 s blue stimulus at 28 lx, and a 4 s yellow stimulus at 4 lx.
比较健康受试者与患有外层或内层视网膜疾病患者在各种刺激条件下的彩色瞳孔光反应(PLR),并确定最佳区分疾病组和对照组所需的参数。
本前瞻性研究纳入了15例色素性视网膜炎(RP)患者、19例视神经疾病(ON)患者和16名健康受试者。ON包括视神经炎(NNO)和非动脉性前部缺血性视神经病变(NAION)。对每位受试者记录其对红色、黄色、绿色和蓝色刺激持续4秒和12秒以及刺激强度为4勒克斯和28勒克斯时的PLR。
对照组与RP或ON患者的结果比较显示,在大多数刺激条件下,刺激开始后的反应存在显著差异,但在光熄灭后3秒和7秒的刺激后振幅无显著差异。另一方面,ON组和RP组之间的差异仅在刺激后时间点以及仅对蓝色刺激时显著。对蓝色和红色反应的差异在主要在刺激后时间点上显著不同。ROC分析显示,4勒克斯、4秒黄色刺激的最大收缩幅度在ON患者与RP患者之间存在显著差异,并且在刺激后7秒对4秒、28勒克斯蓝色刺激的反应在对照组与ON组和RP组患者之间具有高特异性的显著差异。
健康、RP和ON受试者对蓝光的瞳孔光反应彼此显著不同。发现未来方案的最佳刺激是28勒克斯的4秒蓝色刺激和4勒克斯的4秒黄色刺激。