Suppr超能文献

两种实时 RT-PCR 检测方法用于丙型肝炎病毒 RNA 定量的性能:对 HCV 基因型 1-4 的评估。

Performance of two Real-Time RT-PCR assays for quantitation of hepatitis C virus RNA: evaluation on HCV genotypes 1-4.

机构信息

Department of Virology and Liver Unit, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kawasumi, Mizuho, Nagoya, Japan.

出版信息

J Med Virol. 2010 Nov;82(11):1878-88. doi: 10.1002/jmv.21911.

Abstract

Accuracy for monitoring of the concentration of hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA represents a major challenge throughout the management of patients with chronic hepatitis C. To investigate the genotype-independent efficiency and the accuracy of two real-time detection reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assays; the Cobas Ampliprep/Cobas TaqMan (CAP/CTM); and the Abbott RealTime HCV (ART), a total of 184 samples with different HCV subtypes were examined; 1b (n=58), 2a (n=39), 2b (n=26), 3a (n=20), and 4 (n=41). A robust linear correlation was observed between the two assays applied to genotypes 1b, 2a, 2b, and 3a [the correlation coefficient (R) ranged from 0.99 to 0.98], but not to genotype 4 specimens (R=0.78). A significant difference in measurements of HCV RNA using CAP/CTM and ART in serum samples with genotypes 1b and 4 was observed (0.72, -0.53 log IU/ml, P<0.0001, 0.01, respectively). A robust correlation was observed between the HCV core antigen and HCV RNA values by either of the HCV RNA quantitation assays applied to all genotypes with exception of genotype 4, for which R was higher with ART (R=0.95) than with CAP/CTM (R=0.80). The lower limit of detection of CAP/CTM and ART were 41.4 and 28.5 IU/ml using the WHO standards, respectively. In conclusion, two RT-PCR assays had a high efficiency and accuracy for quantitation of HCV RNA of genotypes 2a, 2b, and 3a, but the mean values of HCV RNA differed for genotype 1b and 4.

摘要

在慢性丙型肝炎患者的管理中,监测丙型肝炎病毒 (HCV) RNA 浓度的准确性是一个主要挑战。为了研究两种实时检测逆转录-聚合酶链反应 (RT-PCR) 检测方法,即 Cobas Ampliprep/Cobas TaqMan (CAP/CTM) 和 Abbott RealTime HCV (ART) 的基因型独立效率和准确性,共检测了 184 份具有不同 HCV 亚型的样本;1b (n=58)、2a (n=39)、2b (n=26)、3a (n=20) 和 4 (n=41)。观察到两种检测方法应用于 1b、2a、2b 和 3a 基因型时具有很强的线性相关性 [相关系数 (R) 范围为 0.99 至 0.98],但对 4 型标本无相关性 (R=0.78)。在血清样本中,使用 CAP/CTM 和 ART 测量 1b 和 4 基因型的 HCV RNA 存在显著差异 (0.72、-0.53 log IU/ml,P<0.0001,0.01)。观察到两种 HCV RNA 定量检测方法应用于所有基因型的 HCV 核心抗原和 HCV RNA 值之间存在很强的相关性,除了 4 型,ART (R=0.95) 的相关性高于 CAP/CTM (R=0.80)。使用世卫组织标准,CAP/CTM 和 ART 的检测下限分别为 41.4 和 28.5 IU/ml。结论:两种 RT-PCR 检测方法在定量检测 2a、2b 和 3a 基因型的 HCV RNA 方面具有高效率和准确性,但 1b 和 4 基因型的 HCV RNA 平均值存在差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验