Faculty of Psychology and Education, Department of Clinical Psychology, VU University Amsterdam, Van der Boechorststraat 1, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2010 Oct;78(5):668-80. doi: 10.1037/a0020570.
It is widely believed that psychological treatment has little effect on more severely depressed patients. This study assessed whether pretreatment severity moderates psychological treatment outcome relative to controls by means of meta-analyses.
We included 132 studies (10,134 participants) from a database of studies (www.evidencebasedpsychotherapies.org) in which the effects of psychological treatment on adult outpatients with a depressive disorder or an elevated level of depressive symptoms were compared with a control condition in a randomized controlled trial. Two raters independently extracted outcome data and rated study characteristics. We conducted metaregression analyses assessing whether mean pretreatment depression scores predicted psychological treatment versus control condition posttreatment effect size and subgroup analyses summarizing the results of studies reporting within-study analyses of depression severity and psychological treatment outcome.
Psychological treatment was found to be consistently superior to control conditions (d = 0.40-0.88). We found no indication that pretreatment mean depression scores predicted psychological treatment versus control condition posttreatment effect size, even after adjusting for relevant study characteristics. However, among the smaller subset of studies that reported within-study severity analyses, posttreatment effect sizes were higher for high-severity patients (d = 0.63) than for low-severity patients (d = 0.22) when psychological treatment was efficacious relative to a more stringent control.
Contrary to conventional wisdom, our findings suggest that when compared with control conditions, psychological treatment might be more efficacious for high-severity than for low-severity patients. Because the number of studies reporting within-study severity analyses is small, we recommend that future studies routinely report tests for Severity × Treatment interactions.
人们普遍认为,心理治疗对病情较重的抑郁症患者效果甚微。本研究通过荟萃分析评估了治疗前严重程度是否会对心理治疗相对于对照组的疗效产生影响。
我们纳入了数据库中(www.evidencebasedpsychotherapies.org)的 132 项研究(10134 名参与者),这些研究均为随机对照试验,比较了心理治疗对患有抑郁症或抑郁症状升高的成年门诊患者与对照组的疗效。两名评估者独立提取了研究结果数据并评估了研究特征。我们进行了荟萃回归分析,评估了平均治疗前抑郁评分是否可以预测心理治疗相对于对照组的治疗后效应大小,并进行了亚组分析,总结了报告抑郁严重程度和心理治疗结果的内部研究分析的研究结果。
心理治疗明显优于对照组(d = 0.40-0.88)。即使在调整了相关研究特征后,我们也没有发现治疗前平均抑郁评分可以预测心理治疗相对于对照组的治疗后效应大小。然而,在报告了内部研究严重程度分析的较小亚组研究中,与更严格的对照组相比,当心理治疗有效时,高严重度患者(d = 0.63)的治疗后效应大小高于低严重度患者(d = 0.22)。
与传统观念相反,我们的研究结果表明,与对照组相比,心理治疗对于病情较重的患者可能比病情较轻的患者更有效。由于报告内部研究严重程度分析的研究数量较少,我们建议未来的研究常规报告严重程度与治疗之间的交互作用的检验。