• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

弗雷明汉和 SCORE 心血管风险预测模型在西班牙医疗中心非糖尿病人群中的表现:一项验证研究。

Performance of the Framingham and SCORE cardiovascular risk prediction functions in a non-diabetic population of a Spanish health care centre: a validation study.

机构信息

Centro de Salud Universitario "La Paz", Badajoz, Spain.

出版信息

Scand J Prim Health Care. 2010 Dec;28(4):242-8. doi: 10.3109/02813432.2010.518407. Epub 2010 Sep 27.

DOI:10.3109/02813432.2010.518407
PMID:20873973
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3444797/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To analyse the 10-year performance of the original Framingham coronary risk function and of the SCORE cardiovascular death risk function in a non-diabetic population of 40-65 years of age served by a Spanish healthcare centre. Also, to estimate the percentage of patients who are candidates for antihypertensive and lipid-lowering therapy.

DESIGN

Longitudinal, observational study of a retrospective cohort followed up for 10 years.

SETTING

Primary care health centre.

PATIENTS

A total of 608 non-diabetic patients of 40-65 years of age (mean 52.8 years, 56.7% women), without evidence of cardiovascular disease were studied.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Coronary risk at 10 years from the time of their recruitment, using the tables based on the original Framingham function, and of their 10-year risk of fatal cardiovascular disease using the SCORE tables.

RESULTS

The actual incidence rates of coronary and fatal cardiovascular events were 7.9% and 1.5%, respectively. The original Framingham equation over-predicted risk by 64%, while SCORE function over-predicted risk by 40%, but the SCORE model performed better than the Framingham one for discrimination and calibration statistics. The original Framingham function classified 18.3% of the population as high risk and SCORE 9.2%. The proportions of patients who would be candidates for lipid-lowering therapy were 31.0% and 23.8% according to the original Framingham and SCORE functions, respectively, and 36.8% and 31.2% for antihypertensive therapy.

CONCLUSION

The SCORE function showed better values than the original Framingham function for each of the discrimination and calibration statistics. The original Framingham function selected a greater percentage of candidates for antihypertensive and lipid-lowering therapy.

摘要

目的

分析原始 Framingham 冠心病风险函数和 SCORE 心血管死亡风险函数在一个西班牙医疗中心服务的 40-65 岁非糖尿病人群中 10 年的表现。此外,还估计了适合接受降压和降脂治疗的患者比例。

设计

对一个随访 10 年的回顾性队列进行的纵向观察性研究。

地点

初级保健医疗中心。

患者

共研究了 608 名年龄在 40-65 岁(平均 52.8 岁,56.7%为女性)、无心血管疾病证据的非糖尿病患者。

主要观察指标

采用基于原始Framingham 函数的表格,计算患者在招募后 10 年内的冠心病风险;采用 SCORE 表格,计算患者 10 年内致命心血管疾病的风险。

结果

实际的冠心病和致命心血管事件发生率分别为 7.9%和 1.5%。原始 Framingham 方程高估了 64%的风险,而 SCORE 函数高估了 40%的风险,但 SCORE 模型在区分度和校准度统计方面表现优于 Framingham 模型。原始 Framingham 函数将 18.3%的人群归类为高危人群,而 SCORE 函数则将 9.2%的人群归类为高危人群。根据原始 Framingham 和 SCORE 函数,降脂治疗的候选患者比例分别为 31.0%和 23.8%,降压治疗的候选患者比例分别为 36.8%和 31.2%。

结论

SCORE 函数在区分度和校准度统计方面均优于原始 Framingham 函数。原始 Framingham 函数选择了更多适合接受降压和降脂治疗的候选患者。

相似文献

1
Performance of the Framingham and SCORE cardiovascular risk prediction functions in a non-diabetic population of a Spanish health care centre: a validation study.弗雷明汉和 SCORE 心血管风险预测模型在西班牙医疗中心非糖尿病人群中的表现:一项验证研究。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2010 Dec;28(4):242-8. doi: 10.3109/02813432.2010.518407. Epub 2010 Sep 27.
2
Original and REGICOR Framingham functions in a nondiabetic population of a Spanish health care center: a validation study.在西班牙医疗中心的非糖尿病患者人群中对原始和 REGICORFramingham 函数进行验证研究。
Ann Fam Med. 2011 Sep-Oct;9(5):431-8. doi: 10.1370/afm.1287.
3
Cardiovascular risk and validation of cardiovascular risk prediction functions in a cohort of patients with type 2 diabetes followed for 10 years in Badajoz (SPAIN). AN observational study.心血管风险与在巴达霍斯(西班牙)随访 10 年的 2 型糖尿病患者队列中进行心血管风险预测函数的验证:一项观察性研究。
Prim Care Diabetes. 2021 Feb;15(1):115-120. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2020.07.014. Epub 2020 Aug 15.
4
Validation of the pooled cohort risk score in an Asian population - a retrospective cohort study.亚洲人群中合并队列风险评分的验证——一项回顾性队列研究
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2014 Nov 20;14:163. doi: 10.1186/1471-2261-14-163.
5
Performance of Framingham cardiovascular risk scores by ethnic groups in New Zealand: PREDICT CVD-10.新西兰不同种族的弗雷明汉心血管风险评分表现:PREDICT CVD - 10。
N Z Med J. 2010 Feb 19;123(1309):50-61.
6
[Predictive capacity, comparison and clinic consequences of the Framingham-Wilson and REGICOR tables in persons for whom care has been provided at a health care center, Badajoz, Spain].[西班牙巴达霍斯某医疗中心所服务人群中弗雷明汉-威尔逊量表和REGICOR量表的预测能力、比较及临床后果]
Rev Esp Salud Publica. 2007 Jul-Aug;81(4):353-64. doi: 10.1590/s1135-57272007000400003.
7
The Framingham function overestimates the risk of ischemic heart disease in HIV-infected patients from Barcelona.弗雷明汉函数高估了来自巴塞罗那的HIV感染患者患缺血性心脏病的风险。
HIV Clin Trials. 2016 Jul;17(4):131-9. doi: 10.1080/15284336.2016.1177266. Epub 2016 May 12.
8
An independent external validation and evaluation of QRISK cardiovascular risk prediction: a prospective open cohort study.QRISK心血管疾病风险预测的独立外部验证与评估:一项前瞻性开放队列研究。
BMJ. 2009 Jul 7;339:b2584. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2584.
9
Derivation and validation of QRISK, a new cardiovascular disease risk score for the United Kingdom: prospective open cohort study.英国一种新型心血管疾病风险评分QRISK的推导与验证:前瞻性开放队列研究
BMJ. 2007 Jul 21;335(7611):136. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39261.471806.55. Epub 2007 Jul 5.
10
Initiation and maintenance of cardiovascular medications following cardiovascular risk assessment in a large primary care cohort: PREDICT CVD-16.大型初级保健队列中进行心血管风险评估后启动和维持心血管药物治疗:PREDICT CVD-16研究
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2014 Feb;21(2):192-202. doi: 10.1177/2047487312462150. Epub 2012 Oct 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Research inefficiencies in external validation studies of the Framingham Wilson coronary heart disease risk rule: A systematic review.弗雷明汉威尔逊冠心病风险规则外部验证研究中的研究效率低下:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 13;19(9):e0310321. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310321. eCollection 2024.
2
Exercise, cancer, and the cardiovascular system: clinical effects and mechanistic insights.运动、癌症与心血管系统:临床效应及机制洞察
Basic Res Cardiol. 2025 Feb;120(1):35-55. doi: 10.1007/s00395-024-01034-4. Epub 2024 Feb 14.
3
Evidence supporting the choice of a new cardiovascular risk equation for Australia.支持为澳大利亚选择新心血管风险方程的证据。
Med J Aust. 2023 Aug 21;219(4):173-186. doi: 10.5694/mja2.52052. Epub 2023 Jul 26.
4
Performance of the SCORE and Globorisk cardiovascular risk prediction models: a prospective cohort study in Dutch general practice.SCORE 和 Globorisk 心血管风险预测模型的表现:荷兰普通实践中的前瞻性队列研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2022 Dec 21;73(726):e24-e33. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2021.0726. Print 2023 Jan.
5
Cardiovascular Risk Prediction Models and Scores in the Era of Personalized Medicine.个性化医疗时代的心血管疾病风险预测模型与评分
J Pers Med. 2022 Jul 20;12(7):1180. doi: 10.3390/jpm12071180.
6
Prediction for cardiovascular diseases based on laboratory data: An analysis of random forest model.基于实验室数据的心血管疾病预测:随机森林模型分析。
J Clin Lab Anal. 2020 Sep;34(9):e23421. doi: 10.1002/jcla.23421. Epub 2020 Jul 29.
7
A 10- and 15-year performance analysis of ESC/EAS and ACC/AHA cardiovascular risk scores in a Southern European cohort.一项针对南欧队列的 ESC/EAS 和 ACC/AHA 心血管风险评分的 10 年和 15 年性能分析。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2020 Jun 19;20(1):301. doi: 10.1186/s12872-020-01574-2.
8
Effect of Aerobic and Resistance Exercise Intervention on Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Women With Early-Stage Breast Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.有氧运动和抗阻运动干预对早期乳腺癌女性心血管疾病风险的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Oncol. 2019 May 1;5(5):710-714. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.0038.
9
Beneficial changes on plasma apolipoproteins A and B, high density lipoproteins and oxidized low density lipoproteins in obese women after bariatric surgery: comparison between gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy.肥胖女性接受减重手术后,血浆载脂蛋白 A 和 B、高密度脂蛋白和氧化型低密度脂蛋白的有益变化:胃旁路术与袖状胃切除术的比较。
Lipids Health Dis. 2018 Jun 20;17(1):145. doi: 10.1186/s12944-018-0794-5.
10
Cardiovascular risk assessment by FRS and SCORE in Iranian adult population.伊朗成年人群中采用弗雷明汉风险评分(FRS)和系统性冠状动脉风险评估(SCORE)进行心血管风险评估
J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2017 Aug 23;16:35. doi: 10.1186/s40200-017-0316-4. eCollection 2017.

本文引用的文献

1
An independent and external validation of QRISK2 cardiovascular disease risk score: a prospective open cohort study.QRISK2 心血管疾病风险评分的独立和外部验证:一项前瞻性开放队列研究。
BMJ. 2010 May 13;340:c2442. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c2442.
2
An independent external validation and evaluation of QRISK cardiovascular risk prediction: a prospective open cohort study.QRISK心血管疾病风险预测的独立外部验证与评估:一项前瞻性开放队列研究。
BMJ. 2009 Jul 7;339:b2584. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2584.
3
Secular trends in cardiovascular risk factors with a 36-year perspective: observations from 38- and 50-year-olds in the Population Study of Women in Gothenburg.36年视角下心血管危险因素的长期趋势:哥德堡妇女人群研究中38岁和50岁人群的观察结果
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2008;26(3):140-6. doi: 10.1080/02813430802088403.
4
Did a health dialogue matter? Self-reported cardiovascular disease and diabetes 11 years after health screening.健康对话重要吗?健康筛查11年后的自我报告心血管疾病和糖尿病情况。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2008;26(3):135-9. doi: 10.1080/02813430802113029.
5
Too much doing and too little thinking in medical science!医学领域中做得太多而思考太少!
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2008;26(2):65-6. doi: 10.1080/02813430802110926.
6
Patients prefer pictures to numbers to express cardiovascular benefit from treatment.患者更倾向于用图片而非数字来表达治疗对心血管的益处。
Ann Fam Med. 2008 May-Jun;6(3):213-7. doi: 10.1370/afm.795.
7
Performance of the QRISK cardiovascular risk prediction algorithm in an independent UK sample of patients from general practice: a validation study.QRISK心血管疾病风险预测算法在英国普通门诊独立患者样本中的表现:一项验证研究。
Heart. 2008 Jan;94(1):34-9. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2007.134890. Epub 2007 Oct 4.
8
[Calibrating the SCORE cardiovascular risk chart for use in Spain].[校准用于西班牙的SCORE心血管风险图表]
Rev Esp Cardiol. 2007 May;60(5):476-85.
9
Offering a prognosis in lung cancer: when is a team of experts an expert team?肺癌的预后评估:专家团队何时才能成为真正的专家团队?
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2007 Apr;61(4):308-13. doi: 10.1136/jech.2005.044917.
10
Validity of an adaptation of the Framingham cardiovascular risk function: the VERIFICA Study.弗雷明汉心血管风险函数改编版的有效性:VERIFICA研究。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2007 Jan;61(1):40-7. doi: 10.1136/jech.2005.038505.