Department of Laboratory Medicine, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan.
Cancer Sci. 2010 Nov;101(11):2361-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2010.01720.x. Epub 2010 Sep 28.
Human T-cell leukemia virus type-1 (HTLV-1) proviral load (VL) is an important determinant of viral pathogenesis and malignant evolution. Although VL has been quantified by in-house real-time quantifiable polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) technology, little is known about the harmonization among different VL assay systems. We evaluated intra- and inter-laboratory variability of VL measured at six laboratories using the same DNA samples seropositive for HTLV-1 in a two-step manner. The first study measured 60 samples by original in-house assays, finding that the median intra- and inter-laboratory coefficient of variation (CV) was 44.9% (range, 25.4-71.8%) and 59.9% (34.2-93.4%), respectively. The inter-laboratory correlation coefficients ranged from 0.760 to 0.875, indicating that VL were measured with good precision in each laboratory, but inter-laboratory regression slopes differed from 0.399 to 2.206, indicating that VL were measured with a wide variation between laboratories. To examine the effect of standardization of reference materials (RM) on the VL variability, we performed a second study using only 20 samples by substituting RM for plasmid including the HTLV-1 pX region. The median inter-laboratory CV for raw pX copy number was reduced significantly from 66.9% to 35.7%, whereas the median CV for the internal control remained almost unchanged, resulting in no improvement in inter-laboratory CV for VL. This indicates that each in-house assay system worked well with good precision, but standardizing RM alone was insufficient for harmonization. The relevant choice of not only RM, but also internal control genes for data normalization is expected to be realistic to standardize HTLV-1 VL measurement.
人 T 细胞白血病病毒 1 型(HTLV-1)前病毒载量(VL)是病毒发病机制和恶性演变的重要决定因素。尽管 VL 已通过内部实时定量聚合酶链反应(qPCR)技术进行了量化,但对于不同 VL 检测系统之间的协调仍知之甚少。我们以两步法评估了在六个实验室中使用相同的 HTLV-1 血清阳性 DNA 样本测量的 VL 的实验室内部和实验室间变异性。第一项研究使用原始的内部检测方法测量了 60 个样本,发现中位数实验室内和实验室间变异系数(CV)分别为 44.9%(范围,25.4-71.8%)和 59.9%(34.2-93.4%)。实验室间相关系数范围为 0.760 至 0.875,表明每个实验室均能很好地测量 VL 的精密度,但实验室间回归斜率从 0.399 至 2.206 不等,表明实验室间 VL 的测量值存在很大差异。为了检查参考材料(RM)标准化对 VL 变异性的影响,我们仅使用 20 个样本进行了第二项研究,即用包含 HTLV-1 pX 区的质粒替代 RM。原始 pX 拷贝数的中位数实验室间 CV 从 66.9%显著降低至 35.7%,而内部对照的中位数 CV 几乎保持不变,VL 的实验室间 CV 无明显改善。这表明每个内部检测系统都具有良好的精密度,但仅标准化 RM 不足以实现协调。不仅 RM,而且用于数据归一化的内部对照基因的选择有望成为 HTLV-1 VL 测量标准化的现实选择。