INSERM, Unité U, Créteil, France.
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2010 Dec;12(6):505-11. doi: 10.1007/s11920-010-0156-0.
Current psychiatric disorder classifications are based exclusively on categorical models, which were designed to increase the reliability of diagnoses. However, this system has some limitations, and various psychiatric disorders may be classified using a dimensional approach, which is more appropriate when no clear boundaries exist between entities or when examining various features on a continuum. Thus, the forthcoming DSM-5 appears to be undertaking a hybrid approach by including categorical models associated with dimensions. We aim to review examples of dimensions or symptom clusters associated with a categorical approach that could be useful in refining bipolar disorder classification. We selected predominant polarity, psychotic symptoms, inhibition/activation behavioral level, and emotional reactivity to define mood episodes, impulsivity/suicidality/substance misuse, and cognitive impairment. The selection was based on the fact that these dimensions or symptom clusters are currently being discussed to be implemented in the DSM-5 and/or may orientate toward the choice of specific treatments and represent more homogeneous and thus more appropriate subgroups for research purposes. In the future, there will be a need to identify biomarkers that can definitively validate the use of these criteria.
当前的精神障碍分类完全基于分类模型,这些模型旨在提高诊断的可靠性。然而,该系统存在一些局限性,各种精神障碍可以使用维度方法进行分类,当实体之间没有明确的界限或检查连续体上的各种特征时,这种方法更为合适。因此,即将出台的 DSM-5 似乎通过包含与维度相关的分类模型采用了混合方法。我们旨在回顾与分类方法相关的维度或症状群的例子,这些例子可能有助于完善双相障碍的分类。我们选择了主要极性、精神病症状、抑制/激活行为水平以及对情绪发作的情绪反应、冲动/自杀/物质滥用和认知障碍来定义。选择的依据是,这些维度或症状群目前正在讨论中,以纳入 DSM-5 中,或者可能有助于选择特定的治疗方法,并代表更同质的、因此更适合研究目的的亚组。将来,需要确定能够明确验证这些标准使用的生物标志物。