Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
CJEM. 2010 Sep;12(5):421-30. doi: 10.1017/s1481803500012574.
To enhance patient safety, it is important to understand the frequency and causes of adverse events (defined as unintended injuries related to health care management). We performed this study to describe the types and risk of adverse events in high-acuity areas of the emergency department (ED).
This prospective cohort study examined the outcomes of consecutive patients who received treatment at 2 tertiary care EDs. For discharged patients, we conducted a structured telephone interview 14 days after their initial visit; for admitted patients, we reviewed the inpatient charts. Three emergency physicians independently adjudicated flagged outcomes (e.g., death, return visits to the ED) to determine whether an adverse event had occurred.
We enrolled 503 patients; one-half (n = 254) were female and the median age was 57 (range 18-98) years. The majority of patients (n = 369, 73.3%) were discharged home. The most common presenting complaints were chest pain, generalized weakness and abdominal pain. Of the 107 patients with flagged outcomes, 43 (8.5%, 95% confidence interval 8.1%-8.9%) were considered to have had an adverse event through our peer review process, and over half of these (24, 55.8%) were considered preventable. The most common types of adverse events were as follows: management issues (n = 18, 41.9%), procedural complications (n = 13, 30.2%) and diagnostic issues (n = 10, 23.3%). The clinical consequences of these adverse events ranged from minor (urinary tract infection) to serious (delayed diagnosis of aortic dissection).
We detected a higher proportion of preventable adverse events compared with previous inpatient studies and suggest confirmation of these results is warranted among a wider selection of EDs.
为了提高患者安全,了解不良事件(定义为与医疗管理相关的非预期伤害)的发生频率和原因非常重要。我们进行了这项研究,以描述急诊科(ED)高风险区域的不良事件类型和风险。
这项前瞻性队列研究对在 2 家三级护理 ED 接受治疗的连续患者的结局进行了研究。对于出院患者,我们在他们首次就诊后 14 天进行了结构化电话访谈;对于住院患者,我们回顾了住院病历。3 名急诊医生独立裁决标记的结局(例如,死亡、再次到 ED 就诊),以确定是否发生了不良事件。
我们共纳入了 503 名患者;其中一半(n = 254)为女性,中位年龄为 57 岁(范围 18-98 岁)。大多数患者(n = 369,73.3%)被出院回家。最常见的就诊症状是胸痛、全身无力和腹痛。在有标记结局的 107 名患者中,通过我们的同行评审过程,有 43 名(8.5%,95%置信区间 8.1%-8.9%)被认为发生了不良事件,其中超过一半(24 名,55.8%)被认为是可预防的。最常见的不良事件类型如下:管理问题(n = 18,41.9%)、程序并发症(n = 13,30.2%)和诊断问题(n = 10,23.3%)。这些不良事件的临床后果从轻微(尿路感染)到严重(主动脉夹层延迟诊断)不等。
与之前的住院研究相比,我们发现了更高比例的可预防不良事件,并建议在更广泛的 ED 选择中验证这些结果。