Suppr超能文献

多发伤患者脊柱的早期与晚期稳定。

Early versus late stabilization of the spine in the polytrauma patient.

机构信息

Norton Leatherman Spine Center, Louisville, KY 40202, USA.

出版信息

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Oct 1;35(21 Suppl):S187-92. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181f32bcd.

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether early spinal stabilization in the multiple trauma patient is safe and does not increase morbidity or mortality.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

There is no consensus regarding the timing of surgical stabilization of the injured spine, especially in patients with multiple trauma. Designing and performing randomized clinical trials to evaluate early versus late surgery is difficult.

METHODS

Between January 1990 and July 2009, a computer-aided search using the keywords Spine or Spinal, Trauma, Spinal Cord Injury, and Surgery was done that included MEDLINE, EMBASE, HealthSTAR, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, ACP Journal Club, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PsycINFO, and PsychLit. Articles dealing only with neurologic improvement that did not mention other non-neurologic factors that were affected by early surgery were excluded. The authors selected and assessed the studies to be included in the analysis. An unblinded assessment of the quality of the study was done using the Gradeing of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach to rank each article for its relevance to the topic.

RESULTS

Eleven articles directly comparing 2 cohorts that had early or late surgery were identified. All of the studies evaluated consistently demonstrated shorter hospital and intensive care unit length of stays, fewer days on mechanical ventilation, and lower pulmonary complications in patients who are treated with early spine decompression and stabilization. These advantages are more marked in patients with polytrauma. Data regarding morbidity and mortality rates are more variable.

CONCLUSION

There is strong evidence within the literature that early surgical stabilization consistently leads to shorter hospital stays, shorter intensive care unit stays, less days on mechanical ventilation, and lower pulmonary complications. This effect is more evident in patients who have more severe injuries as measured by Injury Severity Score. This benefit is seen in both, spinal cord injured and noncord-injured patients. There is also some evidence that early stabilization does not increase the complication rates compared to late surgery.

摘要

研究设计

系统评价。

目的

确定多发伤患者早期脊柱固定是否安全,是否不会增加发病率或死亡率。

背景资料总结

对于脊柱损伤的手术固定时机,特别是多发伤患者,尚无共识。设计和进行评估早期与晚期手术的随机临床试验很困难。

方法

1990 年 1 月至 2009 年 7 月,使用关键词“脊柱”、“创伤”、“脊髓损伤”和“手术”,通过计算机辅助搜索,检索了 MEDLINE、EMBASE、HealthSTAR、护理学及相关健康文献累积索引、Cochrane 系统评价数据库、ACP 期刊俱乐部、疗效评价文摘数据库、Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库、PsycINFO 和 PsychLit。排除仅涉及神经改善而未提及早期手术影响的其他非神经因素的文章。作者选择并评估了纳入分析的研究。使用推荐评估、发展和评估分级方法对研究质量进行了盲法评估,为每个文章对主题的相关性进行了分级。

结果

确定了 11 篇直接比较 2 个队列的文章,这 2 个队列分别接受了早期或晚期手术。所有研究一致表明,接受早期脊柱减压和稳定治疗的患者住院时间和重症监护病房停留时间更短,机械通气时间更少,肺部并发症发生率更低。这些优势在多发伤患者中更为明显。关于发病率和死亡率的数据更为多变。

结论

文献中有强有力的证据表明,早期手术稳定始终导致住院时间缩短、重症监护病房停留时间缩短、机械通气时间减少和肺部并发症发生率降低。这种影响在损伤严重程度评分较高的患者中更为明显。脊髓损伤和非脊髓损伤患者都能看到这种益处。也有一些证据表明,与晚期手术相比,早期稳定不会增加并发症发生率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验