Abdel Hamid Ahmed Mostafa, Abo Shady Ashraf Fawzy, Abdel Azeem Ehab S
Department of Anaesthesia and ICU, Benha Faculty of Medicine, Benha University, Egypt.
Indian J Anaesth. 2010 Jul;54(4):318-23. doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.68375.
This study was designed to compare the intra-operative and post-operative analgesic requirements and side effects of using fentanyl infusion versus remifentanil infusion during short-duration surgical procedures in children. The study comprised of 40 children randomly allocated into two equal groups: fentanyl (F-group) or remifentanil (R-group). Both were administered a continuous intravenous (i.v.) infusion. Anaesthetic recovery was assessed using the Brussels sedation scale every 5 min from the time of entry till discharge from recovery room. Post-operative analgesia was assessed throughout the first three post-operative (PO) hours using observational pain-discomfort scale (OPS) and adverse events were recorded. Haemodynamic variables showed a non-significant difference between both the groups. Patients who received remifentanil showed significantly shorter time to spontaneous respiration, eye opening, extubation and verbalization compared to those who received fentanyl. Discharge time was significantly shorter in R-group, and 18 patients fulfilled criteria for recovery-room discharge at ≤25 min with a significant difference in favour of remifentanil. Fentanyl provided significantly better PO analgesia than remifentanil and children in F-group showed a significantly lower mean cumulative OPS record than those in R-group; however, the number of patients requiring rescue analgesia did not show a significant difference between both the groups. Two cases in F-group and one in R-group had bradycardia, one case in R-group had mild hypotension and PO vomiting had occurred in three patients in the F-group and two patients in the R-group. In conclusion, remifentanil is appropriate for opioid-based anaesthesia for paediatric patients as it provides haemodynamic stability and rapid recovery with minimal post-operative side effects.
本研究旨在比较在儿童短时间外科手术中使用芬太尼输注与瑞芬太尼输注时的术中和术后镇痛需求及副作用。该研究包括40名儿童,随机分为两组,每组人数相等:芬太尼组(F组)和瑞芬太尼组(R组)。两组均给予持续静脉输注。从进入恢复室到出院,每隔5分钟使用布鲁塞尔镇静量表评估麻醉恢复情况。在术后的前三个小时内,使用观察性疼痛不适量表(OPS)评估术后镇痛情况,并记录不良事件。血流动力学变量在两组之间无显著差异。与接受芬太尼的患者相比,接受瑞芬太尼的患者自主呼吸、睁眼、拔管和言语恢复的时间明显更短。R组的出院时间明显更短,18名患者在≤25分钟时达到恢复室出院标准,瑞芬太尼组明显更具优势。芬太尼提供的术后镇痛效果明显优于瑞芬太尼,F组儿童的平均累积OPS记录明显低于R组;然而,两组中需要补救镇痛的患者数量没有显著差异。F组有2例、R组有1例出现心动过缓,R组有1例出现轻度低血压,F组有3例、R组有2例出现术后呕吐。总之,瑞芬太尼适用于小儿患者的阿片类麻醉,因为它能提供血流动力学稳定性,恢复迅速,术后副作用最小。