University of Chicago School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2010 Sep;12(9):678-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2010.00341.x. Epub 2010 Jul 8.
Hypertension treatment commonly requires multiple agents to achieve target blood pressure (BP). β-blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) are commonly co-prescribed in clinical practice although few data are available that test their additivity on BP lowering. The efficacy and safety of once-daily extended-release carvedilol (carvedilol CR) combined with the ACEI lisinopril in a double-blind, randomized, factorial design study were studied. Patients (N=656) with stage 1 or 2 hypertension were randomized evenly to 1 of 15 groups for 6 weeks: carvedilol CR monotherapy 20 mg, 40 mg, or 80 mg/d; lisinopril monotherapy 10 mg, 20 mg, or 40 mg/d; or 1 of 9 combinations of carvedilol CR plus lisinopril initiated simultaneously. Primary efficacy measures (assessed by ambulatory BP monitoring [ABPM]) were change from baseline in 24-hour mean diastolic BP (DBP) and in trough (20-24 hours) DBP. Continuous efficacy variables were assessed using analysis of covariance. Whether any combination dose was superior to its monotherapy components was assessed using the Hung AVE procedure. Despite the presence of additional BP lowering observed with most of the combinations compared with their monotherapy components, the Hung AVE test was not significant for either primary efficacy measures. Post hoc analyses of the high-dose combination groups (carvedilol CR/lisinopril regimens of 80/10 mg, 80/20 mg, 80/40 mg, 20/40 mg, and 40/40 mg) showed a significant treatment difference compared with both carvedilol CR 80 mg and lisinopril 40 mg for 24-hour mean DBP but not for trough DBP. With the exception of dizziness, individual adverse events did not increase with ascending doses or combinations. The superiority of initiating combination treatment with carvedilol CR and lisinopril compared with the monotherapy components was not demonstrated with the ABPM measurements. Nonetheless, the post hoc assessment combining all high-dose groups did produce significant 24-hour mean BP reduction when compared with the high-dose monotherapy groups. The tolerability profile of initiating combination therapy was generally comparable to the initiation of treatment with monotherapy.
高血压治疗通常需要多种药物来达到目标血压(BP)。β受体阻滞剂和血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEIs)在临床实践中常联合使用,但关于它们在降低血压方面的相加作用的数据很少。本研究采用双盲、随机、析因设计,评估了每日 1 次服用卡维地洛(carvedilol CR)控释片与 ACEI 依那普利联合治疗的疗效和安全性。共有 656 例 1 期或 2 期高血压患者被随机均分为 15 组,每组 6 周:卡维地洛 CR 单药治疗 20mg、40mg 或 80mg/d;依那普利单药治疗 10mg、20mg 或 40mg/d;或同时起始卡维地洛 CR 与依那普利 9 种联合方案中的 1 种。主要疗效指标(通过动态血压监测[ABPM]评估)为 24 小时平均舒张压(DBP)和谷值(20-24 小时)DBP 的自基线变化。采用协方差分析评估连续疗效变量。采用 Hung AVE 程序评估任何联合剂量是否优于其单药成分。尽管与单药成分相比,大多数联合方案观察到的血压降低更多,但 Hung AVE 检验对主要疗效指标均无统计学意义。对高剂量联合组(卡维地洛 CR/依那普利 80/10mg、80/20mg、80/40mg、20/40mg 和 40/40mg 方案)的事后分析显示,与卡维地洛 CR 80mg 和依那普利 40mg 相比,24 小时平均 DBP 有显著的治疗差异,但谷值 DBP 无差异。除头晕外,个体不良事件未随剂量增加或联合治疗而增加。ABPM 测量未显示起始联合治疗卡维地洛 CR 和依那普利与单药成分相比具有优越性。尽管如此,当将所有高剂量组结合进行事后评估时,与高剂量单药组相比,确实产生了显著的 24 小时平均血压降低。起始联合治疗的耐受性与起始单药治疗相当。