Suppr超能文献

β受体阻滞剂与神经精神疾病风险:一项系统评价与荟萃分析

β-Blockers and risk of neuropsychiatric disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Eddin Lujain Ez, Preyra Rebecca, Ahmadi Fatemeh, Jafari Atefeh, Omrani Mohammad Ali, Muanda Flory T

机构信息

ICES Western, London, ON, Canada.

Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2025 Feb;91(2):325-337. doi: 10.1111/bcp.16361. Epub 2024 Dec 10.

Abstract

AIMS

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the association between β-blocker use and neuropsychiatric adverse events, specifically focusing on short-term outcomes.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search identified studies reporting neuropsychiatric outcomes in patients using β-blockers, including randomized controlled trials and observational studies. Relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for outcomes such as dizziness, insomnia, nightmares, drowsiness and delirium.

RESULTS

Our analysis revealed that β-blocker use was significantly associated with an increased risk of dizziness (RR 1.72, 95% CI [1.39-2.14]; I = 1%, 14 studies) compared to placebo. Lipophilic β-blockers, especially propranolol, showed an even greater risk of dizziness (RR 3.13, 95% CI [1.44-6.84]; I = 0%, three studies). Propranolol was also associated with increased insomnia risk compared to placebo (RR 1.13, 95% CI [1.00-1.28]; I = 0%, five studies). Our data did not show statistically significant increases in the reports of nightmares and somnolence. Other adverse effects, including drowsiness, sleep disturbances, hallucinations and delirium, were noted.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest a significant association between β-blocker use and an increased risk of neuropsychiatric adverse events, particularly insomnia and dizziness with higher risks associated with lipophilic β-blocker use. Given the ambiguity surrounding dizziness and its classification as a neuropsychiatric effect, our findings are exploratory, and we cannot exclude a potential cardiovascular origin for dizziness. Most studies (75%) were published before the CONSORT statement in 1996, indicating potential reporting limitations and a lack of recent research. Additionally, 60% of studies had a high risk of bias, underscoring the need for more rigorous and contemporary investigations into the neuropsychiatric implications of β-blocker use.

摘要

目的

本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在评估使用β受体阻滞剂与神经精神不良事件之间的关联,特别关注短期结局。

方法

全面的文献检索确定了报告使用β受体阻滞剂患者神经精神结局的研究,包括随机对照试验和观察性研究。计算了头晕、失眠、噩梦、嗜睡和谵妄等结局的相对风险(RR)和95%置信区间(CI)。

结果

我们的分析显示,与安慰剂相比,使用β受体阻滞剂与头晕风险增加显著相关(RR 1.72,95%CI[1.39 - 2.14];I² = 1%,14项研究)。亲脂性β受体阻滞剂,尤其是普萘洛尔,头晕风险更高(RR 3.13,95%CI[1.44 - 6.84];I² = 0%,3项研究)。与安慰剂相比,普萘洛尔还与失眠风险增加相关(RR 1.13,95%CI[1.00 - 1.28];I² = 0%,5项研究)。我们的数据未显示噩梦和嗜睡报告有统计学意义的增加。还注意到其他不良反应,包括嗜睡、睡眠障碍、幻觉和谵妄。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,使用β受体阻滞剂与神经精神不良事件风险增加之间存在显著关联,尤其是失眠和头晕,亲脂性β受体阻滞剂使用风险更高。鉴于头晕的不确定性及其作为神经精神效应的分类,我们的研究结果具有探索性,并且我们不能排除头晕潜在的心血管起源。大多数研究(75%)在1996年CONSORT声明之前发表,表明存在潜在的报告局限性以及缺乏近期研究。此外,60%的研究存在高偏倚风险,强调需要对使用β受体阻滞剂的神经精神影响进行更严格和当代的调查。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35e4/11773113/1dba0665aab8/BCP-91-325-g006.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验