Suppr超能文献

尾端罗哌卡因-可乐定:一种更好的术后镇痛方法。

Caudal ropivacaine-clonidine: A better post-operative analgesic approach.

作者信息

Bajwa Sukhminder Jit Singh, Kaur Jasbir, Bajwa Sukhwinder Kaur, Bakshi Geetika, Singh Kanwalpreet, Panda Aparajita

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Gian Sagar Medical College & Hospital, Ram Nagar, Banur, Punjab, India.

出版信息

Indian J Anaesth. 2010 May;54(3):226-30. doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.65368.

Abstract

The aim was to determine qualitative and quantitative aspects of caudal block, haemodynamic effects, and post-operative pain relief of ropivacaine 0.25% versus ropivacaine 0.25% with clonidine for lower abdominal surgeries in paediatric patients. A double-blind study was conducted among 44 paediatric patients in the Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care of our institute. A total of 44 ASA-I paediatric patients between the ages of 1 and 9 years, scheduled for elective hernia surgery, were enrolled in this randomised double-blind study. The caudal block was administered with ropivacaine 0.25% (Group I) and ropivacaine 0.25% and clonidine 2 µg/kg (Group II) after induction with general anaesthesia. Haemodynamic parameters were observed before, during and after the surgical procedure. Post-operative analgesic duration, total dose of rescue analgesia, pain scores and any side effects were looked for and recorded. All the results were tabulated and analysed statistically. The variables in the two groups were compared using the non-parametric tests. For all statistical analyses, the level of significance was P < 0.05. Forty-four patients were enrolled in this study and their data were subjected to statistical analysis: 22 patients in both the groups were comparable with regard to demographic data, haemodynamic parameters and other vitals and were statistically non-significant (P>0.05). The duration of analgesia was significantly prolonged in Group II (P<0.05). The dose requirement for post-operative pain relief was also significantly lesser in Group II. The incidences of side effects were almost comparable and non-significant. A caudal block with 0.25% of isobaric ropivacaine combined with 2 µg/kg of clonidine provides efficient analgesia intra-operatively and prolonged duration of analgesia post-operatively.

摘要

目的是确定0.25%罗哌卡因与0.25%罗哌卡因联合可乐定用于小儿患者下腹部手术时骶管阻滞的定性和定量方面、血流动力学效应及术后疼痛缓解情况。在我们研究所麻醉与重症监护科的44例小儿患者中进行了一项双盲研究。本随机双盲研究纳入了44例年龄在1至9岁、计划行择期疝气手术的ASA-I级小儿患者。全身麻醉诱导后,I组给予0.25%罗哌卡因行骶管阻滞,II组给予0.25%罗哌卡因和2μg/kg可乐定行骶管阻滞。观察手术过程中及术后的血流动力学参数。寻找并记录术后镇痛持续时间、补救镇痛总剂量、疼痛评分及任何副作用。所有结果制成表格并进行统计学分析。两组变量采用非参数检验进行比较。所有统计分析中,显著性水平为P<0.05。本研究纳入了44例患者,其数据进行了统计分析:两组各22例患者在人口统计学数据、血流动力学参数及其他生命体征方面具有可比性,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。II组镇痛持续时间显著延长(P<0.05)。II组术后疼痛缓解所需剂量也显著较少。副作用发生率几乎相当,差异无统计学意义。0.25%等比重罗哌卡因联合2μg/kg可乐定行骶管阻滞可在术中提供有效的镇痛,并延长术后镇痛持续时间。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64b3/2933481/8e3fe07e5de6/IJA-54-226-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验