Suppr超能文献

骨折后是否有时可以合理地 withheld 骨质疏松症药物?再次骨折与死亡的风险比较。

Is withholding osteoporosis medication after fracture sometimes rational? A comparison of the risk for second fracture versus death.

机构信息

Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA.

出版信息

J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2010 Oct;11(8):584-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2009.12.004. Epub 2010 Jun 30.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Undertreatment of osteoporosis is common, even for high-risk patients. Among the reasons for undertreatment may be a clinician's perception of a lack of treatment benefit, particularly in light of patients' expected future mortality. Among US Medicare beneficiaries, we evaluated the risk for second fracture versus death in the 5 years following a hip, clinical vertebral, and wrist/forearm fracture.

METHODS

Using data from 1999 to 2006 for a random 5% sample of US Medicare beneficiaries, we identified individuals who experienced an incident hip, clinical vertebral, or wrist/forearm fracture in 2000 or 2001. We evaluated the risk for a second incident fracture versus death in the following 5 years. Results were stratified by age, gender, race/ethnicity, and medical comorbidities. In light of the competing mortality risk, and assuming 30% efficacy of an osteoporosis medication to prevent a second fracture, we calculated the number of individuals needed to treat (NNT) for 5 years after first fracture to prevent 1 additional subsequent fracture.

RESULTS

We identified 18,853, 12,751, and 7635 persons with an incident hip, clinical vertebral, and wrist/forearm fracture, respectively. Although the 5-year risk of death usually exceeded the risk for second fracture across age, gender, racial groups, and primary fracture type (median ratio of death to second fracture=1.4, interquartile range 0.9, 2.0), the 5-year risk for second fracture was high, varying from a low of 13% to a high of 43%. Across demographic groups, the NNT to prevent a second fracture was low, ranging from 8 to 46.

CONCLUSION

Among older persons with hip, clinical vertebral, or wrist/forearm fracture, although the risk for death was usually greater than the risk for a second fracture, both were high. The relatively low NNT to prevent 1 additional subsequent fracture fell within a range generally considered acceptable for secondary prevention strategies.

摘要

简介

骨质疏松症的治疗不足很常见,即使对于高危患者也是如此。治疗不足的原因之一可能是临床医生认为治疗益处有限,尤其是考虑到患者预期的未来死亡率。在美国医疗保险受益人中,我们评估了髋部、临床椎体和腕/前臂骨折后 5 年内再次骨折与死亡的风险。

方法

使用来自 1999 年至 2006 年的美国医疗保险受益人的随机 5%样本数据,我们确定了在 2000 年或 2001 年经历过髋部、临床椎体或腕/前臂骨折的个体。我们评估了以下 5 年内再次发生骨折与死亡的风险。结果按年龄、性别、种族/族裔和合并症进行分层。鉴于存在竞争死亡风险,并且假设骨质疏松症药物治疗可有效预防 30%的第二次骨折,我们计算了首次骨折后 5 年内预防 1 次后续骨折所需的人数(NNT)。

结果

我们分别确定了 18853 例髋部、12751 例临床椎体和 7635 例腕/前臂骨折患者。尽管 5 年死亡风险通常超过各年龄段、性别、种族群体和主要骨折类型的再次骨折风险(死亡与再次骨折的中位数比值为 1.4,四分位距 0.9,2.0),但 5 年再次骨折风险较高,从低 13%到高 43%不等。在各人群中,预防第二次骨折的 NNT 较低,范围从 8 到 46。

结论

在髋部、临床椎体或腕/前臂骨折的老年人中,尽管死亡风险通常大于再次骨折风险,但两者都很高。预防 1 次后续骨折的相对较低 NNT 落在通常被认为可接受的二级预防策略范围内。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3b5/2950120/6d7a27be5769/nihms166354f1.jpg

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

9
Zoledronic acid and clinical fractures and mortality after hip fracture.唑来膦酸与髋部骨折后的临床骨折及死亡率
N Engl J Med. 2007 Nov 1;357(18):1799-809. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa074941. Epub 2007 Sep 17.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验