Suppr超能文献

讨论预后:平衡希望与现实。

Discussing prognosis: balancing hope and realism.

机构信息

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.

出版信息

Cancer J. 2010 Sep-Oct;16(5):461-6. doi: 10.1097/PPO.0b013e3181f30e07.

Abstract

"How much time do I have?" A patient's question about his/her life expectancy is among the most difficult of conversation topics. Oncologists, often with very little training in communication, routinely handle these requests for sensitive information. Oncologists are aware of the emotional weight surrounding a prognosis discussion: answering a prognosis question poorly can damage both a patient's sense of hope and the relationship with his/her physician. Conversely, when handled well, the discussion can affirm the relationship, build trust, and leave the patient feeling hopeful. Our review presents clinicians with a practical approach to handling prognosis discussions by dealing with 4 critical issues. First, we review what information should be conveyed about a patient's prognosis. Next, we provide tools to help the oncologist deal with a patient's emotional reaction. Then, we provide a framework for the discussion that helps preserve a patient's hope despite a poor prognosis. Finally, we address the impact on the physician and provide some suggestions for dealing with our own emotional reactions.

摘要

“我还有多少时间?”患者询问自己的预期寿命,这是最难以回答的话题之一。肿瘤科医生通常在沟通方面接受的培训很少,但他们经常需要处理这些敏感信息的请求。肿瘤科医生意识到预后讨论所涉及的情感分量:预后问题回答不佳可能会破坏患者的希望感和与医生的关系。相反,当处理得当时,讨论可以肯定关系,建立信任,并让患者感到充满希望。我们的综述为临床医生提供了一种实用的方法来处理预后讨论,通过处理 4 个关键问题。首先,我们回顾应该传达关于患者预后的哪些信息。接下来,我们提供工具来帮助肿瘤科医生应对患者的情绪反应。然后,我们提供一个讨论框架,帮助在预后不佳的情况下保持患者的希望。最后,我们讨论对医生的影响,并提供一些处理自己情绪反应的建议。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验